Detusking Fence-Breaker Elephants as an Approach in Human-Elephant Conflict Mitigation

被引:35
|
作者
Mutinda, Matthew [1 ]
Chenge, Geoffrey [2 ]
Gakuya, Francis [1 ]
Otiende, Moses [1 ]
Omondi, Patrick [1 ]
Kasiki, Samuel [1 ]
Soriguer, Ramon C. [3 ]
Alasaad, Samer [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kenya Wildlife Serv, Nairobi, Kenya
[2] Lewa Wildlife Conservancy, Isiolo, Kenya
[3] CSIC, Estn Biol Donana, E-41080 Seville, Spain
[4] Univ Zurich, Inst Evolutionary Biol & Environm Studies IEU, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 03期
关键词
CROP-RAIDING ELEPHANTS; SELECTION; WILDLIFE; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0091749
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Human-elephant conflict (HEC) is a recurring problem that appears wherever the range of elephants and humans overlap. Different methods including the use of electric fences are used worldwide to mitigate this conflict. Nonetheless, elephants learn quickly that their tusks do not conduct electricity and use them to break down fences (fence-breakers). Methodology/Principal Findings: In Lewa Wildlife Conservancy, Kenya, destructive elephants (Loxodonta africana) were monitored between 2010 and 2013. The fence-breaking rate reached four incidents (fence-breaking) per elephant per 100 days. Ten bull males and 57 females were identified as fence-breakers. The bulls were involved in 85.07% and the females in 14.93% of incidents. The Kenya Wildlife Service approved detusking (partial cutting of tusks) in four of the 10 fence-breakers as a way of preventing them from breaking down fences, thereby mitigating HEC in the Conservancy. The result of the detusking was a drastic six-fold reduction in damage to fences (range: 1.67 to 14.5 times less fence-breaking) by the four worst fence-breaker elephants, because with trimmed tusks elephants lack the tools to break down fences. Detusking could not totally eliminate fence destruction because, despite lacking their tools, elephants can still destroy fences using their heads, bodies and trunks, albeit less effectively. On the other hand, apart from inherent aesthetic considerations, the detusking of elephants may have certain negative effects on factors such as elephants' social hierarchies, breeding, mate selection and their access to essential minerals and food. Conclusions: Elephant detusking seems to be effective in drastically reducing fence-breaking incidents, nonetheless its negative effects on behaviour, access to food and its aesthetical consequences still need to be further studied and investigated.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Factors influencing the habitat suitability of wild Asian elephants and their implications for human-elephant conflict in Myanmar
    Thant, Zaw Min
    Leimgruber, Peter
    Williams, Amirtharaj Christy
    Oo, Zaw Min
    Roskaft, Eivin
    May, Roel
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2023, 43
  • [32] Human-elephant conflict mitigation: sharing lessons and experiences from across East Africa
    Graham, Max
    Adams, Bill
    ORYX, 2010, 44 (01) : 13 - 14
  • [33] Predicting Hotspots of Human-Elephant Conflict to Inform Mitigation Strategies in Xishuangbanna, Southwest China
    Chen, Ying
    Marino, Jorgelina
    Chen, Yong
    Tao, Qing
    Sullivan, Casey D.
    Shi, Kun
    Macdonald, David W.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (09):
  • [34] Electrified fencing as a mitigation strategy for human-elephant conflict in Western Serengeti: Community perspectives
    Matata, Maria T.
    Kegamba, Juma J.
    Mremi, Rudolf
    Eustace, Abraham
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2022, 70
  • [35] A stakeholder assessment of human-elephant conflict in Benin
    Djagoun, Chabi A. M. S.
    Akpona, Hugues
    Kassa, Barthelemy
    Gichohi, Nathan
    Muruthi, Philip
    Sinsin, Brice
    PACHYDERM, 2016, (58): : 161 - 166
  • [36] Predicting spatial aspects of human-elephant conflict
    Sitati, NW
    Walpole, MJ
    Smith, RJ
    Leader-Williams, N
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2003, 40 (04) : 667 - 677
  • [37] Reducing human-elephant conflict: do chillies help deter elephants from entering crop fields?
    Hedges, Simon
    Giunaryadi, Donny
    ORYX, 2010, 44 (01) : 139 - 146
  • [38] Scars of human-elephant conflict: patterns inferred from field observations of Asian elephants in Sri Lanka
    LaDue, Chase A.
    Vandercone, Rajnish P. G.
    Kiso, Wendy K.
    Freeman, Elizabeth W.
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 48 (06) : 540 - 553
  • [39] Patterns of crop-raiding by elephants, Loxodonta africana, in Laikipia, Kenya, and the management of human-elephant conflict
    Graham, Maximilian D.
    Notter, Benedikt
    Adams, William M.
    Lee, Phyllis C.
    Ochieng, Tobias Nyumba
    SYSTEMATICS AND BIODIVERSITY, 2010, 8 (04) : 435 - 445
  • [40] Retraction Note to: Statistical–model based voice activity identification for human-elephant conflict mitigation
    T. Thomas Leonid
    R. Jayaparvathy
    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2023, 14 (Suppl 1) : 429 - 429