Detusking Fence-Breaker Elephants as an Approach in Human-Elephant Conflict Mitigation

被引:35
|
作者
Mutinda, Matthew [1 ]
Chenge, Geoffrey [2 ]
Gakuya, Francis [1 ]
Otiende, Moses [1 ]
Omondi, Patrick [1 ]
Kasiki, Samuel [1 ]
Soriguer, Ramon C. [3 ]
Alasaad, Samer [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Kenya Wildlife Serv, Nairobi, Kenya
[2] Lewa Wildlife Conservancy, Isiolo, Kenya
[3] CSIC, Estn Biol Donana, E-41080 Seville, Spain
[4] Univ Zurich, Inst Evolutionary Biol & Environm Studies IEU, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 03期
关键词
CROP-RAIDING ELEPHANTS; SELECTION; WILDLIFE; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0091749
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Human-elephant conflict (HEC) is a recurring problem that appears wherever the range of elephants and humans overlap. Different methods including the use of electric fences are used worldwide to mitigate this conflict. Nonetheless, elephants learn quickly that their tusks do not conduct electricity and use them to break down fences (fence-breakers). Methodology/Principal Findings: In Lewa Wildlife Conservancy, Kenya, destructive elephants (Loxodonta africana) were monitored between 2010 and 2013. The fence-breaking rate reached four incidents (fence-breaking) per elephant per 100 days. Ten bull males and 57 females were identified as fence-breakers. The bulls were involved in 85.07% and the females in 14.93% of incidents. The Kenya Wildlife Service approved detusking (partial cutting of tusks) in four of the 10 fence-breakers as a way of preventing them from breaking down fences, thereby mitigating HEC in the Conservancy. The result of the detusking was a drastic six-fold reduction in damage to fences (range: 1.67 to 14.5 times less fence-breaking) by the four worst fence-breaker elephants, because with trimmed tusks elephants lack the tools to break down fences. Detusking could not totally eliminate fence destruction because, despite lacking their tools, elephants can still destroy fences using their heads, bodies and trunks, albeit less effectively. On the other hand, apart from inherent aesthetic considerations, the detusking of elephants may have certain negative effects on factors such as elephants' social hierarchies, breeding, mate selection and their access to essential minerals and food. Conclusions: Elephant detusking seems to be effective in drastically reducing fence-breaking incidents, nonetheless its negative effects on behaviour, access to food and its aesthetical consequences still need to be further studied and investigated.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Rebel elephants Resistance through human-elephant partnerships
    Mateer, Jennifer
    HISTORICAL ANIMAL GEOGRAPHIES, 2018, : 121 - 131
  • [22] Spatio-temporal trend and mitigation of human-elephant conflict in Xishuangbanna, China
    Li, Wenwen
    Liu, Peng
    Yang, Nian
    Pan, Han
    Chen, Shang
    Zhang, Li
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 87 (08):
  • [23] Human-elephant conflict in West Bengal, India: present status and mitigation measures
    Majumder, Rajib
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 68 (03)
  • [24] Project orange elephant is a conflict specific holistic approach to mitigating human-elephant conflict in Sri Lanka
    Dharmarathne, Chathuranga
    Fernando, Chandima
    Weerasinghe, Chinthaka
    Corea, Ravi
    COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY, 2020, 3 (01) : 43
  • [25] Human-elephant conflict: attitudes of local people toward elephants and the conflict management authority in a shared landscape of India
    Dash, Suraj Kumar
    Ghosh, Saumyajit
    Das, Rana
    Das, Dipankar
    Nandy, Subrata
    Das, Tulsi
    Sonker, Gaurav
    HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF WILDLIFE, 2024,
  • [26] Effect of human-elephant conflict on local attitudes toward the conservation of wild Asian elephants in Myanmar
    Thant, Zaw Min
    May, Roel
    Roskaft, Eivin
    HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF WILDLIFE, 2023, 28 (06) : 547 - 563
  • [27] Correlation between increased human-elephant conflict and poaching of elephants in Burkina Faso (West Africa)
    Aimé Compaore
    Djidama Sirima
    Emmanuel M. Hema
    Benoît Doamba
    Stephanie N. Ajong
    Massimiliano Di Vittorio
    Luca Luiselli
    European Journal of Wildlife Research, 2020, 66
  • [28] Project orange elephant is a conflict specific holistic approach to mitigating human-elephant conflict in Sri Lanka
    Chathuranga Dharmarathne
    Chandima Fernando
    Chinthaka Weerasinghe
    Ravi Corea
    Communications Biology, 3
  • [29] Responses of African elephants towards a bee threat: Its application in mitigating human-elephant conflict
    Ndlovu, Mduduzi
    Devereux, Emma
    Chieffe, Melissa
    Asklof, Kendra
    Russo, Alicia
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2016, 112 (1-2) : 52 - 56
  • [30] Correlation between increased human-elephant conflict and poaching of elephants in Burkina Faso (West Africa)
    Compaore, Aime
    Sirima, Djidama
    Hema, Emmanuel M.
    Doamba, Benoit
    Ajong, Stephanie N.
    Di Vittorio, Massimiliano
    Luiselli, Luca
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2020, 66 (01)