Evaluation of enamel loss by scanning electron microscopy after debonding brackets place with four different adhesives

被引:3
|
作者
Rodriguez-Chavez, Jacqueline Adelina [1 ]
Arenas-Alatorre, Jesus Angel [2 ]
Flores-Ruiz, Hugo M. [3 ]
Flores-Ledesma, Abigailt [4 ]
Aguilar-Perez, Fernando Javier [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guadalajara, Dept Clin Odontol Integrales, Ctr Univ Ciencias Salud, Salvador Quevedo & Zubieta 228,Edificio B, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Dept Mat Condensada, Inst Fis, Circuito Invest Cient S-N,Ciudad Univ, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
[3] Univ Guadalajara, Dept Ciencias Nat & Exactas, CUValles Campus, Ameca 46600, Jalisco, Mexico
[4] Benemerita Univ Autonoma Puebla, Fac Estomatol, 31 Poniente 1304, Puebla 72410, Mexico
[5] Univ Autonoma Yucatan, Fac Odontol, Campus Ciencias Salud,Calle 61-A 492-A, Merida 97000, Yucatan, Mexico
关键词
adhesion; scanning electron microscope; shear bonding strength; tooth enamel loss; SHEAR BOND STRENGTH; SELF-ETCHING PRIMER; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; CERAMIC BRACKETS; REMOVAL; COMPOSITE;
D O I
10.1002/jemt.23652
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
The clinically adequate shear bond strengths (SBS) should be from 2.8 to 10 MPa. The aim of this research is to observe tooth enamel loss through a scanning electron microscope (SEM) during the debonding of braces of four adhesive systems. Then, 100 premolars were used in 4 groups of 25 specimens each, for Transbond MIP (G1), Enlight (G2), Stylus (G3), and Transbond Plus SEP (G4). The research was done under the NOM ISO/TS 11405:2015. Gemini 3M were placed under the manufacturer's recommendations. The SBS test was done at 24 hr in an Instron electromechanical universal testing machine at 1 mm/1 min. Adhesive remnant index (ARI) was measured, all of the brackets where examined in the SEM. For the shear bonding strength G1 = 10.09 +/- 2.73 MPa, G2 = 9.27 +/- 3.99 MPa, G3 = 7.83 +/- 4.46 MPa, and G4 = 6.40 +/- 2.85 MPa statistically significant differences were found when comparing the four groups (p = .002). In the Tukey post hoc test, G1 versus G4 and G2 versus G4, statistically significant differences were found. For the ARI a value of 1 in 46%, followed by a value of 2 in 38%, a value of 3 in 13% and a value of 0 in 3% of the total samples, finding statistically significant differences (p < .001). In relation to the tooth enamel loss due to SBS, statistically significant differences were found (p = .326). G1 and G4 had not statistically significant differences. Even though our results concur with the appropriate clinical values, we observed tooth enamel loss with Transbond Plus SEP and Stylus.
引用
收藏
页码:912 / 920
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of enamel surfaces after bracket debonding: An in-vivo study with scanning electron microscopy
    Bonetti, Giulio Alessandri
    Zanarini, Matteo
    Parenti, Serena Incerti
    Lattuca, Monica
    Marchionni, Silvia
    Gatto, Maria Rosaria
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 140 (05) : 696 - 702
  • [2] Comparative study of dental enamel loss after debonding braces by analytical scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
    Adelina Rodriguez-Chavez, Jacqueline
    Arenas-Alatorre, Jesus
    Belio-Reyes, Irma Araceli
    MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 2017, 80 (07) : 680 - 686
  • [3] A Comparative Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness of Two Different Bonding Adhesives After Debonding With Atomic Force Microscopy
    Doddavarapu, Swaroop
    Brahmani, K.
    Singaraju, Gowri Sankar
    Priyanka, J. S. Yamini
    Reddy, Ganugapanta Vivek
    Mandava, Prasad
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [4] A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE DEBONDING STRENGTHS OF DIFFERENT CERAMIC BRACKETS, ENAMEL CONDITIONERS, AND ADHESIVES
    BISHARA, SE
    FEHR, DE
    JAKOBSEN, JR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1993, 104 (02) : 170 - 179
  • [5] Electron microscopy analysis of different orthodontic brackets and their adhesion to the tooth enamel
    Ciocan, Delia Ioana
    Stanciu, Dragos
    Popescu, Manuela Anca
    Miculescu, Florin
    Plotog, Ioan
    Varzaru, Gaudentiu
    Ciocan, Lucian Toma
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY AND EMBRYOLOGY, 2014, 55 (02): : 591 - 596
  • [6] Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness after Various Finishing Techniques for Debonding of Orthodontic Brackets
    Erdur, Emire Aybuke
    Akin, Mehmet
    Cime, Leyla
    Ileri, Zehra
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 29 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [7] Acidic soft drinks effects on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets and a scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the enamel
    Oncag, G
    Tuncer, AV
    Tosun, YS
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2005, 75 (02) : 247 - 253
  • [8] Enamel colour changes at debonding and after finishing procedures using five different adhesives
    Trakyali, Goeksu
    Ozdemir, Fulya Isik
    Arun, Tuelin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2009, 31 (04) : 397 - 401
  • [9] Evaluation of pain perception during orthodontic debonding of metallic brackets with four different techniques
    Kilinc, Delal Dara
    Sayar, Gulsilay
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ORAL SCIENCE, 2019, 27
  • [10] Assessment of Enamel Surface Using Scanning Electron Microscope After Debonding Conventional and Self-Ligating Metal and Ceramic Brackets: An In Vitro Study
    Lishna, Karalikkattil T.
    Shaloob, Muhamed
    Antony, Vincy
    Roshan, Gazanafer
    Parayaruthottam, Prathapan
    Nayaz, V. P. Mohammed
    Raheesh, Muhammed
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 16 (03): : 214 - 222