Bridging biofuel sustainability indicators and ecosystem services through stakeholder engagement

被引:26
|
作者
Dale, Virginia H. [1 ]
Kline, Keith L. [1 ]
Richard, Tom L. [2 ]
Karlen, Douglas L. [3 ]
Belden, William W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Environm Sci, Ctr Bioenergy Sustainabil, POB 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Inst Energy & Environm, Agr & Biol Engn, 225 Agr Engn Bldg, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] ARS, Soil Water & Air Resources Res, USDA, 2110 Univ Blvd, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[4] Antares Grp Inc, 6123 270th Pl, Moravia, IA 52571 USA
来源
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY | 2018年 / 114卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Biofuel; Ecosystem services; Landscape design; Sustainability; Water quality; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; CORN STOVER HARVEST; NUTRIENT REMOVAL; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RACCOON RIVER; ENERGY CROPS; CENTRAL IOWA; BIOENERGY; SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.09.016
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Continued development of cellulosic-based biofuels is needed to provide renewable energy and strengthen rural investment and development in the United States (US). To ensure biofuel development is sustainable and does not negatively affect ecosystem services, stakeholder input is necessary to identify sensitive and meaningful indicators. A major challenge is that there are substantial differences in terminology, perspectives, and methods used to quantify sustainability and ecosystem services with regard to processes, biodiversity, and socioeconomic effects. Our objectives were to identify relevant indicator categories for both perspectives using a case study from the US state of Iowa. A scientific literature review and engagement with stakeholders were used to identify 11 indicator categories associated with production, harvest, storage, and transport of cellulosic feedstocks. Five categories focus on environmental concerns (soil quality, water quality and quantity, greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity, and productivity) and six on socioeconomic concerns (social wellbeing, energy security, external trade, profitability, resource conservation, and social acceptability). Although these indicators reflect sustainability concerns of these stakeholders, additional monitoring and stakeholder engagement are needed to support the continual improvement that is part of adaptive management. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 156
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prioritizing ecosystem services for marine management through stakeholder engagement
    Custodio, Marco
    Moulaert, Ine
    Asselman, Jana
    van der Biest, Katrien
    van de Pol, Lennert
    Drouillon, Magriet
    Hernandez Lucas, Simon
    Taelman, Sue Ellen
    Everaert, Gert
    [J]. Ocean and Coastal Management, 2022, 225
  • [2] Prioritizing ecosystem services for marine management through stakeholder engagement
    Custodio, Marco
    Moulaert, Ine
    Asselman, Jana
    van der Biest, Katrien
    van de Pol, Lennert
    Drouillon, Magriet
    Lucas, Simon Hernandez
    Taelman, Sue Ellen
    Everaert, Gert
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 225
  • [3] Ecosystem services, sustainability and thermodynamic indicators
    Jorgensen, Sven Erik
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL COMPLEXITY, 2010, 7 (03) : 311 - 313
  • [4] Using an ecosystem services perspective to assess biofuel sustainability
    Gasparatos, A.
    Romeu-Dalmau, C.
    von Maltitz, G.
    Johnson, F. X.
    Jumbe, C. B.
    Stromberg, P.
    Willis, K.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2018, 114 : 1 - 7
  • [5] Phosphorus sustainability through coordinated stakeholder engagement: a perspective
    Deviney A.
    Grieger K.
    Merck A.
    Classen J.
    Marshall A.-M.
    [J]. Environment Systems and Decisions, 2023, 43 (3) : 371 - 378
  • [6] Mechanisms and indicators for assessing the impact of biofuel feedstock production on ecosystem services
    Gasparatos, Alexandros
    Romeu-Dalmau, Carla
    von Maltitz, Graham P.
    Johnson, Francis X.
    Shackleton, Charlie
    Jarzebski, Marcin P.
    Jumbe, Charles
    Ochieng, Caroline
    Mudombi, Shakespear
    Nyambane, Anne
    Willis, Katherine J.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2018, 114 : 157 - 173
  • [7] WebGIS for communicating Alpine ecosystem services: stakeholder engagement in Slovenian protected areas
    Polderman, Annemarie
    Vurunic, Suzana
    Hoube, Nadine
    Bender, Oliver
    Haller, Andreas
    [J]. ECO MONT-JOURNAL ON PROTECTED MOUNTAIN AREAS RESEARCH, 2020, 12 (01): : 55 - 59
  • [8] Stakeholder Engagement in Decision Making and Pathways of Influence for Southern Ocean Ecosystem Services
    Solomonsz, Josh
    Melbourne-Thomas, Jess
    Constable, Andrew
    Trebilco, Rowan
    van Putten, Ingrid
    Goldsworthy, Lyn
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [9] Stakeholder engagement to ensure the sustainability of biobanks: a survey of potential users of biobank services
    Klingler, Corinna
    von Jagwitz-Biegnitz, Magdalena
    Baber, Ronny
    Becker, Karl-Friedrich
    Dahl, Edgar
    Eibner, Cornelius
    Fuchs, Joerg
    Groenewold, Maike K.
    Hartung, Mara Lena
    Hummel, Michael
    Jahns, Roland
    Kirsten, Romy
    Kopfnagel, Verena
    Maushagen, Regina
    Nussbeck, Sara Yasemin
    Schoneberg, Anne
    Winter, Theresa
    Specht, Cornelia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2022, 30 (12) : 1344 - 1354
  • [10] Stakeholder engagement to ensure the sustainability of biobanks: a survey of potential users of biobank services
    Corinna Klingler
    Magdaléna von Jagwitz-Biegnitz
    Ronny Baber
    Karl-Friedrich Becker
    Edgar Dahl
    Cornelius Eibner
    Jörg Fuchs
    Maike K. Groenewold
    Mara Lena Hartung
    Michael Hummel
    Roland Jahns
    Romy Kirsten
    Verena Kopfnagel
    Regina Maushagen
    Sara Yasemin Nussbeck
    Anne Schoneberg
    Theresa Winter
    Cornelia Specht
    [J]. European Journal of Human Genetics, 2022, 30 : 1344 - 1354