Stakeholder engagement to ensure the sustainability of biobanks: a survey of potential users of biobank services

被引:0
|
作者
Corinna Klingler
Magdaléna von Jagwitz-Biegnitz
Ronny Baber
Karl-Friedrich Becker
Edgar Dahl
Cornelius Eibner
Jörg Fuchs
Maike K. Groenewold
Mara Lena Hartung
Michael Hummel
Roland Jahns
Romy Kirsten
Verena Kopfnagel
Regina Maushagen
Sara Yasemin Nussbeck
Anne Schoneberg
Theresa Winter
Cornelia Specht
机构
[1] Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin,German Biobank Node
[2] University Leipzig,Leipzig Medical Biobank
[3] University of Leipzig Medical Center,Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics
[4] Gewebebank des Klinikums rechts der Isar und der Technischen Universität München,RWTH centralized Biomaterial Bank (RWTH cBMB), Institute of Pathology
[5] Am Institut für Pathologie der TU München,Integrated Biobank Jena (IBBJ), Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics
[6] RWTH Aachen University,Interdisciplinary Bank of Biomaterials and Data Würzburg (ibdw)
[7] University Hospital Jena,Central Biobank Charité (ZeBanC), Institute of Pathology
[8] University Hospital of Würzburg,NCT Liquid Biobank, National Center for Tumor Diseases and BioMaterialBank Heidelberg (BMBH)
[9] Research Unit of Molecular Epidemiology/Core Facility Biobank,Hannover Unified Biobank
[10] Institute of Epidemiology,Interdisciplinary Center for Biobanking
[11] Helmholtz Zentrum München,Lübeck (ICB
[12] German Research Center for Environmental Health,L)
[13] Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin,Central Biobank UMG
[14] University Hospital Heidelberg,Integrated Research Biobank Greifswald
[15] Hannover Medical School,undefined
[16] University of Lübeck,undefined
[17] University Medical Center Göttingen,undefined
[18] University Medicine Greifswald,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Biobanks are important infrastructures facilitating biomedical research. After a decade of rolling out such infrastructures, a shift in attention to the sustainability of biobanks could be observed in recent years. In this regard, an increase in the as yet relatively low utilisation rates of biobanks has been formulated as a goal. Higher utilisation rates can only be achieved if the perspectives of potential users of biobanks—particularly researchers not yet collaborating with biobanks—are adequately considered. To better understand their perspectives, a survey was conducted at ten different research institutions in Germany hosting a centralised biobank. The survey targeted potential users of biobank services, i.e. researchers working with biosamples. It addressed the general demand for biosamples, strategies for biosample acquisition/storage and reasons for/against collaborating with biobanks. In total, 354 researchers filled out the survey. Most interestingly, only a minority of researchers (12%) acquired their biosamples via biobanks. Of the respondents not collaborating with biobanks on sample acquisition, around half were not aware of the (services of the) respective local biobank. Those who actively decided against acquiring biosamples via a biobank provided different reasons. Most commonly, respondents stated that the biosamples required were not available, the costs were too high and information about the available biosamples was not readily accessible. Biobanks can draw many lessons from the results of the survey. Particularly, external communication and outreach should be improved. Additionally, biobanks might have to reassess whether their particular collection strategies are adequately aligned with local researchers’ needs.
引用
收藏
页码:1344 / 1354
页数:10
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Stakeholder engagement to ensure the sustainability of biobanks: a survey of potential users of biobank services
    Klingler, Corinna
    von Jagwitz-Biegnitz, Magdalena
    Baber, Ronny
    Becker, Karl-Friedrich
    Dahl, Edgar
    Eibner, Cornelius
    Fuchs, Joerg
    Groenewold, Maike K.
    Hartung, Mara Lena
    Hummel, Michael
    Jahns, Roland
    Kirsten, Romy
    Kopfnagel, Verena
    Maushagen, Regina
    Nussbeck, Sara Yasemin
    Schoneberg, Anne
    Winter, Theresa
    Specht, Cornelia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2022, 30 (12) : 1344 - 1354
  • [2] Bridging biofuel sustainability indicators and ecosystem services through stakeholder engagement
    Dale, Virginia H.
    Kline, Keith L.
    Richard, Tom L.
    Karlen, Douglas L.
    Belden, William W.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2018, 114 : 143 - 156
  • [3] EXPOSING STUDENTS TO THE POTENTIAL AND RISKS OF STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT WHEN TEACHING SUSTAINABILITY: A CLASSROOM EXERCISE
    Collins, Eva
    Kearins, Kate
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2007, 31 (04) : 521 - 540
  • [4] Social services provision and stakeholder engagement in the Nigerian informal sector: A systemic concept for transformation and business sustainability
    Ufua, Daniel E.
    Olujobi, Olusola J.
    Tahir, Hammad
    Okafor, Victoria
    Imhonopi, David
    Osabuohien, Evans
    [J]. BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW, 2022, 127 (02) : 403 - 421
  • [5] Preferences on policy options for ensuring the financial sustainability of health care services in the future: Results of a stakeholder survey
    Tordrup D.
    Angelis A.
    Kanavos P.
    [J]. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2013, 11 (6) : 639 - 652
  • [6] A priory allocation of ecosystem services to forest stands in a forest management context considering scientific suitability, stakeholder engagement and sustainability concept with multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) technique: A case study in Turkey
    Baskent, Emin Zeki
    Balci, Hueseyin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 369