Prioritizing ecosystem services for marine management through stakeholder engagement

被引:0
|
作者
Custodio, Marco [1 ]
Moulaert, Ine [1 ]
Asselman, Jana [2 ]
van der Biest, Katrien [3 ]
van de Pol, Lennert [3 ]
Drouillon, Magriet [4 ]
Hernandez Lucas, Simon [4 ,5 ]
Taelman, Sue Ellen [6 ]
Everaert, Gert [1 ]
机构
[1] Flanders Marine Institute, Wandelaarkaai 7, Ostend,B-8400, Belgium
[2] Blue Growth Research Lab, Ghent University, Bluebridge, Wetenschapspark 1, Ostend,8400, Belgium
[3] University of Antwerp, Department of Biology, Ecosystem Management Research Group, Universiteitsplein 1C, Wilrijk,B-2610, Belgium
[4] Ghent University, BLUEGent Business Development Center in Aquaculture and Blue Life Sciences, Ghent,9000, Belgium
[5] Ghent University, Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology and Aquatic Ecology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent,9000, Belgium
[6] Ghent University, Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Sustainable Systems Engineering (STEN) Research Group, Coupure Links 653, Gent,9000, Belgium
来源
关键词
Continental shelfs - Economic activities - Ecosystem services - Ecosystem-based management - Marine management - Marine Spatial Planning - Social preference - Stakeholder - Stakeholder engagement - Trade off;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When applying the Ecosystem Services (ES) concept for the management of marine activities it is beneficial to involve stakeholders from the start and incorporate their knowledge in the decision-making process. Doing so can help to identify key ES, to prioritize the development of human activities that positively impact those ES, and to identify potential trade-offs and win-win scenarios between sectors. On the Belgian Continental Shelf (BCS), different marine economic activities share a relatively small area where the demand for space continues to grow to accommodate emerging sectors. In order to systematically capture the stakeholders' opinions on key ecosystem services and to make the relation between specific marine economic activities and the anticipated change these bring to the ES, a stakeholder workshop was organized. Participants had to prioritize a list of fourteen marine ES relevant to the BCS and the highest-ranking ES were coastal protection, biodiversity, offshore wind energy, surface for navigation, and habitat maintenance. In addition, a conceptual diagram was co-developed linking marine activities and ES to highlight potential synergies and trade-offs, with a focus on the fastest growing activity in the BCS - offshore wind farming. The approach presented is easily transferable and can help researchers and decision-makers capture stakeholders’ perceptions regarding the importance of local ES at specific points in time, thus providing a baseline for establishing priorities during ES modeling and management. © 2022 The Authors
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prioritizing ecosystem services for marine management through stakeholder engagement
    Custodio, Marco
    Moulaert, Ine
    Asselman, Jana
    van der Biest, Katrien
    van de Pol, Lennert
    Drouillon, Magriet
    Lucas, Simon Hernandez
    Taelman, Sue Ellen
    Everaert, Gert
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 225
  • [2] Bridging biofuel sustainability indicators and ecosystem services through stakeholder engagement
    Dale, Virginia H.
    Kline, Keith L.
    Richard, Tom L.
    Karlen, Douglas L.
    Belden, William W.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2018, 114 : 143 - 156
  • [3] MODELING STAKEHOLDER PREFERENCES WITH PROBABILISTIC INVERSION Application to Prioritizing Marine Ecosystem Vulnerabilities
    Neslo, R.
    Micheli, F.
    Kappel, C. V.
    Selkoe, K. A.
    Halpern, B. S.
    Cooke, R. M.
    [J]. REAL-TIME AND DELIBERATIVE DECISION MAKING: APPLICATION TO EMERGING STRESSORS, 2008, : 265 - +
  • [4] WebGIS for communicating Alpine ecosystem services: stakeholder engagement in Slovenian protected areas
    Polderman, Annemarie
    Vurunic, Suzana
    Hoube, Nadine
    Bender, Oliver
    Haller, Andreas
    [J]. ECO MONT-JOURNAL ON PROTECTED MOUNTAIN AREAS RESEARCH, 2020, 12 (01): : 55 - 59
  • [5] Stakeholder Engagement in Decision Making and Pathways of Influence for Southern Ocean Ecosystem Services
    Solomonsz, Josh
    Melbourne-Thomas, Jess
    Constable, Andrew
    Trebilco, Rowan
    van Putten, Ingrid
    Goldsworthy, Lyn
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [6] Integrating stakeholder perceptions and preferences on ecosystem services in the management of coastal areas
    de Juan, S.
    Gelcich, S.
    Fernandez, M.
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 136 : 38 - 48
  • [7] Using the ecosystem services concept to analyse stakeholder involvement in wetland management
    Emmanuelle Cohen-Shacham
    Tamar Dayan
    Rudolf de Groot
    Coralie Beltrame
    Fanny Guillet
    Eran Feitelson
    [J]. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 2015, 23 : 241 - 256
  • [8] Using the ecosystem services concept to analyse stakeholder involvement in wetland management
    Cohen-Shacham, Emmanuelle
    Dayan, Tamar
    de Groot, Rudolf
    Beltrame, Coralie
    Guillet, Fanny
    Feitelson, Eran
    [J]. WETLANDS ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 23 (02) : 241 - 256
  • [9] Marine ecosystem services
    Barbier, Edward B.
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (11) : R507 - R510
  • [10] Linking Ecosystem Health and Services to Inform Marine Ecosystem-Based Management
    Arkema, Katie K.
    Samhouri, Jameal F.
    [J]. ADVANCING AN ECOSYSTEM APPROACH IN THE GULF OF MARINE, 2012, 79 : 9 - +