Bridging biofuel sustainability indicators and ecosystem services through stakeholder engagement

被引:26
|
作者
Dale, Virginia H. [1 ]
Kline, Keith L. [1 ]
Richard, Tom L. [2 ]
Karlen, Douglas L. [3 ]
Belden, William W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Environm Sci, Ctr Bioenergy Sustainabil, POB 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Inst Energy & Environm, Agr & Biol Engn, 225 Agr Engn Bldg, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] ARS, Soil Water & Air Resources Res, USDA, 2110 Univ Blvd, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[4] Antares Grp Inc, 6123 270th Pl, Moravia, IA 52571 USA
来源
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY | 2018年 / 114卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Biofuel; Ecosystem services; Landscape design; Sustainability; Water quality; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; CORN STOVER HARVEST; NUTRIENT REMOVAL; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RACCOON RIVER; ENERGY CROPS; CENTRAL IOWA; BIOENERGY; SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.09.016
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Continued development of cellulosic-based biofuels is needed to provide renewable energy and strengthen rural investment and development in the United States (US). To ensure biofuel development is sustainable and does not negatively affect ecosystem services, stakeholder input is necessary to identify sensitive and meaningful indicators. A major challenge is that there are substantial differences in terminology, perspectives, and methods used to quantify sustainability and ecosystem services with regard to processes, biodiversity, and socioeconomic effects. Our objectives were to identify relevant indicator categories for both perspectives using a case study from the US state of Iowa. A scientific literature review and engagement with stakeholders were used to identify 11 indicator categories associated with production, harvest, storage, and transport of cellulosic feedstocks. Five categories focus on environmental concerns (soil quality, water quality and quantity, greenhouse gas emissions, biodiversity, and productivity) and six on socioeconomic concerns (social wellbeing, energy security, external trade, profitability, resource conservation, and social acceptability). Although these indicators reflect sustainability concerns of these stakeholders, additional monitoring and stakeholder engagement are needed to support the continual improvement that is part of adaptive management. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 156
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental Indicators of Biofuel Sustainability: What About Context?
    Rebecca A. Efroymson
    Virginia H. Dale
    Keith L. Kline
    Allen C. McBride
    Jeffrey M. Bielicki
    Raymond L. Smith
    Esther S. Parish
    Peter E. Schweizer
    Denice M. Shaw
    [J]. Environmental Management, 2013, 51 : 291 - 306
  • [32] Biofuel Supply Chains: Impacts, Indicators and Sustainability Metrics
    Smith, Raymond L.
    [J]. PRES 2010: 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PROCESS INTEGRATION, MODELLING AND OPTIMISATION FOR ENERGY SAVING AND POLLUTION REDUCTION, 2010, 21 : 1135 - 1140
  • [33] Social services provision and stakeholder engagement in the Nigerian informal sector: A systemic concept for transformation and business sustainability
    Ufua, Daniel E.
    Olujobi, Olusola J.
    Tahir, Hammad
    Okafor, Victoria
    Imhonopi, David
    Osabuohien, Evans
    [J]. BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW, 2022, 127 (02) : 403 - 421
  • [34] Stakeholder Perceptions of Coastal Habitat Ecosystem Services
    Lauren Hutchison
    Paul Montagna
    Dave Yoskowitz
    Damion Scholz
    Jace Tunnell
    [J]. Estuaries and Coasts, 2015, 38 : 67 - 80
  • [35] Ecosystem Services, Governance, and Stakeholder Participation: an Introduction
    Paavola, Jouni
    Hubacek, Klaus
    [J]. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (04):
  • [36] A comparison of stakeholder engagement practices in voluntary sustainability standards
    van der Ven, Hamish
    [J]. REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2024, 18 (03) : 820 - 836
  • [37] Stakeholder Perceptions of Coastal Habitat Ecosystem Services
    Hutchison, Lauren
    Montagna, Paul
    Yoskowitz, Dave
    Scholz, Damion
    Tunnell, Jace
    [J]. ESTUARIES AND COASTS, 2015, 38 : S67 - S80
  • [38] Conceptualizing stakeholder engagement in the context of sustainability and its assessment
    Mathur, Vivek Narain
    Price, Andrew D. F.
    Austin, Simon
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2008, 26 (06) : 601 - 609
  • [39] Deliberative democracy for effective stakeholder engagement in sustainability assessment
    Mathur, Vivek
    Price, Andrew
    Austin, Simon
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE CITIZENS AND GOVERNANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2006, : 78 - +
  • [40] Rapid prioritization of marine ecosystem services and ecosystem indicators
    Werner, Sandra R.
    Spurgeon, James P. G.
    Isaksen, Gary H.
    Smith, Joseph P.
    Springer, Nina K.
    Gettleson, David A.
    N'Guessan, Lucie
    Dupont, Jennifer M.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2014, 50 : 178 - 189