Biomechanical Evaluation of Bioabsorbable Versus Metallic Screws for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Inlay Graft Fixation A Comparative Study

被引:16
|
作者
Gupta, Aman [2 ]
Lattermann, Christian [3 ]
Busam, Matthew [4 ]
Riff, Andrew [5 ]
Bach, Bernard R., Jr. [1 ]
Wang, Vincent M.
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Div Sports Med, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Bioengn, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Lexington, KY USA
[4] Cincinnati Sports Med Res & Educ Fdn, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] Georgetown Med Sch, Washington, DC USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2009年 / 37卷 / 04期
关键词
knee; posterior cruciate ligament; inlay; reconstruction; tendon graft; TENDON-BONE GRAFT; TIBIAL INLAY; INTERFERENCE SCREWS; TRANSTIBIAL TECHNIQUES; ANKLE FRACTURES; SINGLE-BUNDLE; FOLLOW-UP; RECONSTRUCTION; STRENGTH; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1177/0363546508328106
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although a tibial inlay technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is advantageous, metallic screw fixation of the bone block is required. This may pose problems for future surgery (eg, osteotomies, total knee replacement). Hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the biomechanical integrity of bone block fixation using stainless steel versus bioabsorbable screw fixation of the tibial inlay graft in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Fourteen human cadaveric knees were randomized to receive either stainless steel or bioabsorbable screw fixation of a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Cyclic tensile testing of each construct was performed, followed by a load-to-failure test. Digital video digitization was used to optically determine tendon graft deformation. Results: Cyclic creep deformation showed no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .8). The failure load S stainless steel, 461 +/- 231 N; bioabsorbable, 638 +/- 492 N; P = .7) and linear stiffness S stainless steel, 116 +/- 22 N/mm, bioabsorbable, 106 +/- 44 N/mm; P = .6) also showed no significant difference between the 2 groups. Optically measured graft deformation was not significant for distal (P = .7) and midsubstance (P = .8) regions, while proximal deformation was significantly higher for bioabsorbable fixation (P = .02). All samples failed at the tibial insertion site with the tibial bone block fracturing at the screws. Conclusion: Bioabsorbable screw fixation using a tibial inlay technique does not compromise the strength and stiffness characteristics afforded by metallic fixation. From a biomechanical perspective, bioabsorbable screws are a viable alternative to metal in the context of tibial inlay reconstruction. Clinical Relevance: Use of bioabsorbable fixation can potentially eliminate future hardware problems after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a tibial inlay technique.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 753
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MRI of broken bioabsorbable crosspin fixation in hamstring graft reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament
    Bakhru, Prashant
    Park, Brian
    Umans, Hilary
    DiFelice, Gregory S.
    Tobin, Keith
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 40 (06) : 737 - 743
  • [32] MRI of broken bioabsorbable crosspin fixation in hamstring graft reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament
    Prashant Bakhru
    Brian Park
    Hilary Umans
    Gregory S. DiFelice
    Keith Tobin
    Skeletal Radiology, 2011, 40 : 737 - 743
  • [33] Biomechanical Evaluation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Fixation Techniques
    Kleweno, Conor P.
    Jacir, Alberto M.
    Gardner, Thomas R.
    Ahmad, Christopher S.
    Levine, William N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (02): : 339 - 345
  • [34] Biomechanical Evaluation of Cross-Pin Versus Interference Screw Tibial Fixation Using a Soft-Tissue Graft During Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Lee, Yong Seuk
    Wang, Joon Ho
    Bae, Ji Hoon
    Lim, Hong Chul
    Park, Jung Ho
    Ahn, Jin Hwan
    Bae, Tae Soo
    Lim, Bee-Oh
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2009, 25 (09): : 989 - 995
  • [35] Posteromedial versus direct posterior approach for posterior cruciate ligament avulsion - A comparative study
    Prakash, Jatin
    Jaiman, Ashish
    Chopra, Rajesh Kumar
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMA AND REHABILITATION, 2020, 27 (02) : 166 - 172
  • [36] Biomechanical evaluation of a novel dynamic posterior cruciate ligament brace
    Heinrichs, Christian H.
    Schmoelz, Werner
    Mayr, Raul
    Keiler, Alexander
    Schoettle, Philip B.
    Attal, Rene
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2016, 33 : 20 - 25
  • [37] The effect of injury to the posterolateral structures of the knee on force in a posterior cruciate ligament graft - A biomechanical study
    LaPrade, RF
    Muench, C
    Wentorf, F
    Lewis, JL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (02): : 233 - 238
  • [38] Biomechanical Properties of Different Fixation Techniques for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fractures
    Domnick, Christoph
    Koesters, Clemens
    Franke, Friederike
    Raschke, Michael J.
    Petersen, Wolf
    Fink, Christian
    Herbort, Mirco
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2016, 32 (06): : 1065 - 1071
  • [39] Interference screw versus Endoscrew fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A biomechanical comparative study in sawbones and porcine knees
    Hung, Chu-Chih
    Chen, Wen-Chuan
    Yang, Chan-Tsung
    Cheng, Cheng-Kung
    Chen, Chih-Hwa
    Lai, Yu-Shu
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2014, 2 (02) : 82 - 90
  • [40] Evolgate fixation of doubled flexor graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - Biomechanical evaluation with cyclic loading
    Ferretti, A
    Conteduca, F
    Labianca, L
    Monaco, E
    De Carli, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (04): : 574 - 582