Biomechanical Evaluation of Bioabsorbable Versus Metallic Screws for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Inlay Graft Fixation A Comparative Study

被引:16
|
作者
Gupta, Aman [2 ]
Lattermann, Christian [3 ]
Busam, Matthew [4 ]
Riff, Andrew [5 ]
Bach, Bernard R., Jr. [1 ]
Wang, Vincent M.
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Div Sports Med, Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Bioengn, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Coll Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Lexington, KY USA
[4] Cincinnati Sports Med Res & Educ Fdn, Cincinnati, OH USA
[5] Georgetown Med Sch, Washington, DC USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2009年 / 37卷 / 04期
关键词
knee; posterior cruciate ligament; inlay; reconstruction; tendon graft; TENDON-BONE GRAFT; TIBIAL INLAY; INTERFERENCE SCREWS; TRANSTIBIAL TECHNIQUES; ANKLE FRACTURES; SINGLE-BUNDLE; FOLLOW-UP; RECONSTRUCTION; STRENGTH; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1177/0363546508328106
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Although a tibial inlay technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is advantageous, metallic screw fixation of the bone block is required. This may pose problems for future surgery (eg, osteotomies, total knee replacement). Hypothesis: There is no significant difference in the biomechanical integrity of bone block fixation using stainless steel versus bioabsorbable screw fixation of the tibial inlay graft in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Fourteen human cadaveric knees were randomized to receive either stainless steel or bioabsorbable screw fixation of a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Cyclic tensile testing of each construct was performed, followed by a load-to-failure test. Digital video digitization was used to optically determine tendon graft deformation. Results: Cyclic creep deformation showed no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .8). The failure load S stainless steel, 461 +/- 231 N; bioabsorbable, 638 +/- 492 N; P = .7) and linear stiffness S stainless steel, 116 +/- 22 N/mm, bioabsorbable, 106 +/- 44 N/mm; P = .6) also showed no significant difference between the 2 groups. Optically measured graft deformation was not significant for distal (P = .7) and midsubstance (P = .8) regions, while proximal deformation was significantly higher for bioabsorbable fixation (P = .02). All samples failed at the tibial insertion site with the tibial bone block fracturing at the screws. Conclusion: Bioabsorbable screw fixation using a tibial inlay technique does not compromise the strength and stiffness characteristics afforded by metallic fixation. From a biomechanical perspective, bioabsorbable screws are a viable alternative to metal in the context of tibial inlay reconstruction. Clinical Relevance: Use of bioabsorbable fixation can potentially eliminate future hardware problems after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a tibial inlay technique.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 753
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hybrid femoral fixation of soft-tissue grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the EndoButton CL and bioabsorbable interference screws: A biomechanical study
    Oh, Young Ho
    Namkoong, Suk
    Strauss, Eric J.
    Ishak, Charbel
    Jazrawi, Laith M.
    Rosen, Jeffrey
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2006, 22 (11): : 1218 - 1224
  • [22] THE HUMAN POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT COMPLEX - AN INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDY - LIGAMENT MORPHOLOGY AND BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION
    HARNER, CD
    XEROGEANES, JW
    LIVESAY, GA
    CARLIN, GJ
    SMITH, BA
    KUSAYAMA, T
    KASHIWAGUCHI, S
    WOO, SLY
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1995, 23 (06): : 736 - 745
  • [23] Serial magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of operative site after fixation of patellar tendon graft with bioabsorbable interference screws in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Lajtai, G
    Noszian, I
    Humer, K
    Unger, F
    Aitzetmüller, G
    Orthner, E
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 1999, 15 (07): : 709 - 718
  • [24] A biomechanical study of replacement of the posterior cruciate ligament with a graft .2. Forces in the graft compared with forces in the intact ligament
    Markolf, KL
    Slauterbeck, JR
    Armstrong, KL
    Shapiro, MS
    Finerman, GAM
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1997, 79A (03): : 381 - 386
  • [25] Biomechanical Analysis of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Aperture Femoral Fixation
    Mutnal, Amar
    Leo, Brian M.
    Vargas, Luis
    Colbrunn, Robb W.
    Butler, Robert S.
    Uribe, John W.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 38 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [26] Biomechanical Comparison of Figure-of-8 Versus Cylindrical Tibial Inlay Constructs for Arthroscopic Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Thiele, Ramon A. Ruberte
    Campbell, Robert Brick
    Amendola, Annunziato
    Sekiya, Jon K.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2010, 26 (07): : 977 - 983
  • [27] The biomechanical characteristics of arthroscopic tibial inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: in vitro comparison of tibial graft tunnel placement
    Benedetto, Karl Peter
    Hoffelner, Thomas
    Osti, Michael
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (11) : 2363 - 2368
  • [28] The biomechanical characteristics of arthroscopic tibial inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: in vitro comparison of tibial graft tunnel placement
    Karl Peter Benedetto
    Thomas Hoffelner
    Michael Osti
    International Orthopaedics, 2014, 38 : 2363 - 2368
  • [29] Open Tibial Inlay Versus Arthroscopic Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions
    Panchal, Hemang B.
    Sekiya, Jon K.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2011, 27 (09): : 1289 - 1295
  • [30] Buttress Plating Versus Anterior-to-Posterior Lag Screws for Fixation of the Posterior Malleolus: A Biomechanical Study
    Bennett, Chase
    Behn, Anthony
    Daoud, Adam
    Nork, Sean
    Sangeorzan, Bruce
    Dikos, Gregory
    Bishop, Julius
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2016, 30 (12) : 664 - 669