Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study

被引:2
|
作者
Fenoglietto, P. [1 ]
Khodri, M. [2 ]
Nguyen, D. [3 ]
Josserand-Pietri, F. [4 ]
Ailleres, N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Reg Canc Montpellier ICM, Dept Oncol Radiotherapie, F-34298 Montpellier 5, France
[2] ICL, Dept Oncol Radiotherapie, St Etienne, France
[3] Grp ORLAM, Serv Radiotherapie, Macon, France
[4] Grp ORLAM, Serv Radiotherapie, Villeurbanne, France
关键词
VOLUMETRIC-MODULATED ARC; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION; PROSTATE-CANCER; DYNAMIC IMRT; RADIOTHERAPY; DELIVERY; THERAPY; RAPIDARC; VERIFICATION;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-015-0577-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To verify the accuracy of volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) using the RapidArc (TM) device when switching patients from one single linear accelerator (linac) to a paired energy and mechanics "twin" linac without reoptimization of the original treatment plan. Patients and Methods: Four centers using 8 linacs were involved in this study. Seventy-four patients previously treated with the 6MV photon RapidArc (TM) technique were selected for analysis, using 242 measurements. In each institution, all patients were planned on linac A, and their plans were verified both on linac A and on the twin linac B. Verifications were done using the amorphous silicium electronic portal imager (EPID) of the linacs and were analyzed with the EpiQa software (Epidos, Bratislavia, Slovakia). The gamma index formalism was used for validation with a double threshold of 3 % and 3 mm with a measurement resolution of 0.39 mm/pixel, and a smoothed resolution of approximately 2.5 mm. Results: The number of points passing the gamma criteria between the measured and computed doses was 94.79 +/- 2.57 % for linac A and 94.61 +/- 2.46 % for linac B. Concerning the smoothed measurement analysis, 98.67 +/- 1.26 % and 98.59 +/- 1.20 % points passing the threshold were obtained for linacs A and B, respectively. The difference between the 2 dose matrices acquired on the EPID was very small, with 99.92 +/- 0.06 % of the points passing the criteria. Conclusion: For linacs sharing the same mechanical and energy parameters, this study tends to indicate that patients may be safely switched from treatment with one linac to treatment with its twin linac using the same VMAT plan.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Twin machines validation for VMAT treatments using electronic portal-imaging device: a multicenter study
    P. Fenoglietto
    M. Khodri
    D. Nguyen
    F. Josserand-Pietri
    N. Aillères
    Radiation Oncology, 11
  • [2] Validation of Gated RapidArc treatments delivery using the Electronic Portal Imaging Device
    Molinier, J.
    Bedos, L.
    Ailleres, N.
    Azria, D.
    Fenoglietto, P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S158 - S158
  • [3] In vivo dosimetry with electronic portal imaging device in VMAT for prostate cancer
    Inui, S.
    Ueda, Y.
    Ono, S.
    Ohira, S.
    Isono, M.
    Nitta, Y.
    Murata, S.
    Miyazaki, M.
    Teshima, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 133 : S942 - S942
  • [4] Clinical practice and evaluation of electronic portal imaging device for VMAT quality assurance
    Huang, Yen-Cho
    Yeh, Chien-Yi
    Yeh, Jih-Hsiang
    Lo, Ching-Jung
    Tsai, Ping-Fang
    Hung, Chih-Hung
    Tsai, Chieh-Sheng
    Chen, Chen-Yuan
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2013, 38 (01) : 35 - 41
  • [5] A method for in vivo treatment verification of IMRT and VMAT based on electronic portal imaging device
    Jun Zhang
    Xiuqing Li
    Miaomiao Lu
    Qilin Zhang
    Xile Zhang
    Ruijie Yang
    Maria F. Chan
    Junhai Wen
    Radiation Oncology, 16
  • [6] A method for in vivo treatment verification of IMRT and VMAT based on electronic portal imaging device
    Zhang, Jun
    Li, Xiuqing
    Lu, Miaomiao
    Zhang, Qilin
    Zhang, Xile
    Yang, Ruijie
    Chan, Maria F.
    Wen, Junhai
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [7] Gantry-Resolved Linac QA for VMAT: A Comprehensive and Efficient System Using An Electronic Portal Imaging Device
    Zwan, B. J.
    Barnes, M.
    Hindmarsh, J.
    Seymour, E.
    O'Connor, D. J.
    Keall, P. J.
    Greer, P. B.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3712 - 3712
  • [8] MEASUREMENT POSSIBILITIES USING AN ELECTRONIC PORTAL IMAGING DEVICE
    KIRBY, MC
    WILLIAMS, PC
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1993, 29 (02) : 237 - 243
  • [9] PORTAL DOSE MEASUREMENT IN RADIOTHERAPY USING AN ELECTRONIC PORTAL IMAGING DEVICE (EPID)
    HEIJMEN, BJM
    PASMA, KL
    KROONWIJK, M
    ALTHOF, VGM
    DEBOER, JCJ
    VISSER, AG
    HUIZENGA, H
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1995, 40 (11): : 1943 - 1955
  • [10] Verification of MLC Position Using Electric Portal Imaging Device During VMAT Delivery
    Hashimoto, M.
    Haga, A.
    Takahashi, R.
    Nakajima, M.
    Hashimoto, T.
    Saotome, S.
    Sato, T.
    Nakagawa, K.
    Kozuka, T.
    Oguchi, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S768 - S769