Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity

被引:117
|
作者
Klein, Carissa J. [1 ]
Brown, Christopher J. [2 ,3 ]
Halpern, Benjamin S. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Segan, Daniel B. [7 ]
McGowan, Jennifer [8 ]
Beger, Maria [8 ]
Watson, James E. M. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Geog Planning & Environm Management, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Global Change Inst, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[4] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
[5] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Santa Barbara, CA 93117 USA
[6] Natl Ctr Ecol Anal Synth, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 USA
[7] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Global Conservat Program, Bronx, NY 10460 USA
[8] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2015年 / 5卷
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
CONSERVATION; TARGETS; RESERVES;
D O I
10.1038/srep17539
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The first international goal for establishing marine protected areas (MPAs) to conserve the ocean's biodiversity was set in 2002. Since 2006, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has driven MPA establishment, with 193 parties committed to protecting >10% of marine environments globally by 2020, especially 'areas of particular importance for biodiversity' (Aichi target 11). This has resulted in nearly 10 million km(2) of new MPAs, a growth of similar to 360% in a decade. Unlike on land, it is not known how well protected areas capture marine biodiversity, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of existing MPAs and future protection requirements. We assess the overlap of global MPAs with the ranges of 17,348 marine species (fishes, mammals, invertebrates), and find that 97.4% of species have <10% of their ranges represented in stricter conservation classes. Almost all (99.8%) of the very poorly represented species (<2% coverage) are found within exclusive economic zones, suggesting an important role for particular nations to better protect biodiversity. Our results offer strategic guidance on where MPAs should be placed to support the CBD's overall goal to avert biodiversity loss. Achieving this goal is imperative for nature and humanity, as people depend on biodiversity for important and valuable services.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sustainable financing of a national Marine Protected Area network in Fiji
    Ison, Sierra
    Hills, Jeremy
    Morris, Cherie
    Stead, Selina M.
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2018, 163 : 352 - 363
  • [32] Developing a marine protected area network with multiple objectives in China
    Li, Yunzhou
    Zhang, Chongliang
    Xue, Ying
    Xu, Binduo
    Sun, Ming
    Ren, Yiping
    Chen, Yong
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2019, 29 (06) : 952 - 963
  • [33] Sensitivity of marine protected area network connectivity to atmospheric variability
    Fox, Alan D.
    Henry, Lea-Anne
    Corne, David W.
    Roberts, J. Murray
    [J]. ROYAL SOCIETY OPEN SCIENCE, 2016, 3 (11):
  • [34] Recasting shortfalls of marine protected areas as opportunities through adaptive management
    Ban, Natalie C.
    Cinner, Joshua E.
    Adams, Vanessa M.
    Mills, Morena
    Almany, Glenn R.
    Ban, Stephen S.
    Mccook, Laurence J.
    White, Alan
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2012, 22 (02) : 262 - 271
  • [35] Weak biodiversity connectivity in the European network of no-take marine protected areas
    Assis, J.
    Fragkopoulou, E.
    Serrao, E. A.
    Horta e Costa, B.
    Gandra, M.
    Abecasis, D.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 773
  • [36] A biodiversity survey of scavenging amphipods in a proposed marine protected area: the Filchner area in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica
    Charlotte Havermans
    Meike Anna Seefeldt
    Christoph Held
    [J]. Polar Biology, 2018, 41 : 1371 - 1390
  • [37] Global Biodiversity Indicators Reflect the Modeled Impacts of Protected Area Policy Change
    Costelloe, Brendan
    Collen, Ben
    Milner-Gulland, E. J.
    Craigie, Ian D.
    McRae, Louise
    Rondinini, Carlo
    Nicholson, Emily
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2016, 9 (01): : 14 - 20
  • [38] A biodiversity survey of scavenging amphipods in a proposed marine protected area: the Filchner area in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica
    Havermans, Charlotte
    Seefeldt, Meike Anna
    Held, Christoph
    [J]. POLAR BIOLOGY, 2018, 41 (07) : 1371 - 1390
  • [39] Biodiversity of benthic macroinvertebrates on hard substrates in the Currais Marine Protected Area, in southern Brazil
    Bumbeer, Janaina
    Cattani, Andre Pereira
    Chierigatti, Ncolas Binneck
    da Rocha, Rosana Moreira
    [J]. BIOTA NEOTROPICA, 2016, 16 (04):
  • [40] CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF MOLLUSCA BIODIVERSITY IN COASTAL WATERS OF FOCA, MARINE PROTECTED AREA, TURKIYE
    Culha, Mehmet
    Culha, Saniye Turk
    Somek, Hasim
    Aksoy, Ozlem
    Karaduman, Fatma Rahia
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2022, 31 (08): : 8068 - 8076