Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity

被引:117
|
作者
Klein, Carissa J. [1 ]
Brown, Christopher J. [2 ,3 ]
Halpern, Benjamin S. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Segan, Daniel B. [7 ]
McGowan, Jennifer [8 ]
Beger, Maria [8 ]
Watson, James E. M. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Geog Planning & Environm Management, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Global Change Inst, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[4] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
[5] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Santa Barbara, CA 93117 USA
[6] Natl Ctr Ecol Anal Synth, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 USA
[7] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Global Conservat Program, Bronx, NY 10460 USA
[8] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2015年 / 5卷
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
CONSERVATION; TARGETS; RESERVES;
D O I
10.1038/srep17539
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The first international goal for establishing marine protected areas (MPAs) to conserve the ocean's biodiversity was set in 2002. Since 2006, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has driven MPA establishment, with 193 parties committed to protecting >10% of marine environments globally by 2020, especially 'areas of particular importance for biodiversity' (Aichi target 11). This has resulted in nearly 10 million km(2) of new MPAs, a growth of similar to 360% in a decade. Unlike on land, it is not known how well protected areas capture marine biodiversity, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of existing MPAs and future protection requirements. We assess the overlap of global MPAs with the ranges of 17,348 marine species (fishes, mammals, invertebrates), and find that 97.4% of species have <10% of their ranges represented in stricter conservation classes. Almost all (99.8%) of the very poorly represented species (<2% coverage) are found within exclusive economic zones, suggesting an important role for particular nations to better protect biodiversity. Our results offer strategic guidance on where MPAs should be placed to support the CBD's overall goal to avert biodiversity loss. Achieving this goal is imperative for nature and humanity, as people depend on biodiversity for important and valuable services.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Coral reefs and the global network of marine protected areas
    Mora, Camilo
    Andrefouet, Serge
    Costello, Mark J.
    Kranenburg, Christine
    Rollo, Audrey
    Veron, John
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    Myers, Ransom A.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2006, 312 (5781) : 1750 - 1751
  • [22] Conservation beyond the existing protected area network is required to improve species and habitat representation in a global biodiversity hotspot
    De Alban, Jose Don T.
    Leong, Bryan Po Ian
    Venegas-Li, Ruben
    Connette, Grant M.
    Jamaludin, Johanness
    Latt, Kyaw Thinn
    Oswald, Patrick
    Reeder, Carl
    Webb, Edward L.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2021, 257
  • [23] Mixed effects of a national protected area network on terrestrial and freshwater biodiversity
    Andrea Santangeli
    Benjamin Weigel
    Laura H. Antão
    Elina Kaarlejärvi
    Maria Hällfors
    Aleksi Lehikoinen
    Andreas Lindén
    Maija Salemaa
    Tiina Tonteri
    Päivi Merilä
    Kristiina Vuorio
    Otso Ovaskainen
    Jarno Vanhatalo
    Tomas Roslin
    Marjo Saastamoinen
    [J]. Nature Communications, 14
  • [24] Mixed effects of a national protected area network on terrestrial and freshwater biodiversity
    Santangeli, Andrea
    Weigel, Benjamin
    Anto, Laura H.
    Kaarlejaervi, Elina
    Haellfors, Maria
    Lehikoinen, Aleksi
    Linden, Andreas
    Salemaa, Maija
    Tonteri, Tiina
    Merilae, Paeivi
    Vuorio, Kristiina
    Ovaskainen, Otso
    Vanhatalo, Jarno
    Roslin, Tomas
    Saastamoinen, Marjo
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 14 (01)
  • [25] Assessing the performance of the existing and proposed network of marine protected areas to conserve marine biodiversity in Chile
    Tognelli, Marcelo F.
    Fernandez, Miriam
    Marquet, Pablo A.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2009, 142 (12) : 3147 - 3153
  • [26] The role of privately protected areas in achieving biodiversity representation within a national protected area network
    Ivanova, Ielyzaveta M.
    Cook, Carly N.
    [J]. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2020, 2 (12)
  • [27] Complementarity and Area-Efficiency in the Prioritization of the Global Protected Area Network
    Kullberg, Peter
    Toivonen, Tuuli
    Pouzols, Federico Montesino
    Lehtomaki, Joona
    Di Minin, Enrico
    Moilanen, Atte
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (12):
  • [28] Australian biodiversity and marine protected areas
    Kriwoken, LK
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 1996, 33 (1-3) : 113 - 132
  • [29] Strategies in scheduling marine protected area establishment in a network system
    Kininmonth, Stuart
    Weeks, Rebecca
    Abesamis, Rene A.
    Bernardo, Lawrence Patrick C.
    Beger, Maria
    Treml, Eric A.
    Williamson, David
    Pressey, Robert L.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2019, 29 (01)
  • [30] Estimating marine protected area network benefits for reef sharks
    Martin, Gerardo
    Espinoza, Mario
    Heupel, Michelle
    Simpfendorfer, Colin A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2020, 57 (10) : 1969 - 1980