Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity

被引:117
|
作者
Klein, Carissa J. [1 ]
Brown, Christopher J. [2 ,3 ]
Halpern, Benjamin S. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Segan, Daniel B. [7 ]
McGowan, Jennifer [8 ]
Beger, Maria [8 ]
Watson, James E. M. [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Geog Planning & Environm Management, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Global Change Inst, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
[3] Griffith Univ, Australian Rivers Inst, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[4] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
[5] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Santa Barbara, CA 93117 USA
[6] Natl Ctr Ecol Anal Synth, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 USA
[7] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Global Conservat Program, Bronx, NY 10460 USA
[8] Univ Queensland, Sch Biol Sci, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Qld 4072, Australia
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2015年 / 5卷
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
CONSERVATION; TARGETS; RESERVES;
D O I
10.1038/srep17539
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The first international goal for establishing marine protected areas (MPAs) to conserve the ocean's biodiversity was set in 2002. Since 2006, the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) has driven MPA establishment, with 193 parties committed to protecting >10% of marine environments globally by 2020, especially 'areas of particular importance for biodiversity' (Aichi target 11). This has resulted in nearly 10 million km(2) of new MPAs, a growth of similar to 360% in a decade. Unlike on land, it is not known how well protected areas capture marine biodiversity, leaving a significant gap in our understanding of existing MPAs and future protection requirements. We assess the overlap of global MPAs with the ranges of 17,348 marine species (fishes, mammals, invertebrates), and find that 97.4% of species have <10% of their ranges represented in stricter conservation classes. Almost all (99.8%) of the very poorly represented species (<2% coverage) are found within exclusive economic zones, suggesting an important role for particular nations to better protect biodiversity. Our results offer strategic guidance on where MPAs should be placed to support the CBD's overall goal to avert biodiversity loss. Achieving this goal is imperative for nature and humanity, as people depend on biodiversity for important and valuable services.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shortfalls in the global protected area network at representing marine biodiversity
    Carissa J. Klein
    Christopher J. Brown
    Benjamin S. Halpern
    Daniel B. Segan
    Jennifer McGowan
    Maria Beger
    James E.M. Watson
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 5
  • [2] Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity
    Ana S. L. Rodrigues
    Sandy J. Andelman
    Mohamed I. Bakarr
    Luigi Boitani
    Thomas M. Brooks
    Richard M. Cowling
    Lincoln D. C. Fishpool
    Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca
    Kevin J. Gaston
    Michael Hoffmann
    Janice S. Long
    Pablo A. Marquet
    John D. Pilgrim
    Robert L. Pressey
    Jan Schipper
    Wes Sechrest
    Simon N. Stuart
    Les G. Underhill
    Robert W. Waller
    Matthew E. J. Watts
    Xie Yan
    [J]. Nature, 2004, 428 : 640 - 643
  • [3] Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity
    Rodrigues, ASL
    Andelman, SJ
    Bakarr, MI
    Boitani, L
    Brooks, TM
    Cowling, RM
    Fishpool, LDC
    da Fonseca, GAB
    Gaston, KJ
    Hoffmann, M
    Long, JS
    Marquet, PA
    Pilgrim, JD
    Pressey, RL
    Schipper, J
    Sechrest, W
    Stuart, SN
    Underhill, LG
    Waller, RW
    Watts, MEJ
    Yan, X
    [J]. NATURE, 2004, 428 (6983) : 640 - 643
  • [4] Widespread shortfalls in protected area resourcing undermine efforts to conserve biodiversity
    Coad, Lauren
    Watson, James E. M.
    Geldmann, Jonas
    Burgess, Neil D.
    Leverington, Fiona
    Hockings, Marc
    Knights, Kathryn
    Di Marco, Moreno
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 17 (05) : 259 - 264
  • [5] Does the global network of marine protected areas provide an adequate safety net for marine biodiversity?
    Edgar, Graham J.
    [J]. AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2011, 21 (04) : 313 - 316
  • [6] Modelling the role of marine protected area in biodiversity conservation
    Sarker, Subrata
    Rahman, Md Jalilur
    Wahab, Md Abdul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEA RESEARCH, 2023, 196
  • [7] Underprotected Marine Protected Areas in a Global Biodiversity Hotspot
    Claudet, Joachim
    Loiseau, Charles
    Sostres, Marta
    Zupan, Mirta
    [J]. ONE EARTH, 2020, 2 (04): : 380 - 384
  • [8] Protected area connectivity: Shortfalls in global targets and country-level priorities
    Saura, Santiago
    Bertzky, Bastian
    Bastin, Lucy
    Battistella, Luca
    Mandrici, Andrea
    Dubois, Gregoire
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2018, 219 : 53 - 67
  • [9] Using key biodiversity areas to guide effective expansion of the global protected area network
    Kullberg, Peter
    Di Minin, Enrico
    Moilanen, Atte
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2019, 20
  • [10] Targeting Global Protected Area Expansion for Imperiled Biodiversity
    Venter, Oscar
    Fuller, Richard A.
    Segan, Daniel B.
    Carwardine, Josie
    Brooks, Thomas
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    Di Marco, Moreno
    Iwamura, Takuya
    Joseph, Liana
    O'Grady, Damien
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Rondinini, Carlo
    Smith, Robert J.
    Venter, Michelle
    Watson, James E. M.
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2014, 12 (06):