Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome

被引:398
|
作者
Burgess, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge CB1 8RN, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Mendelian randomization; sample size; power; binary outcome; allele score; CAUSAL ODDS RATIO; WEAK INSTRUMENTS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1093/ije/dyu005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Sample size calculations are an important tool for planning epidemiological studies. Large sample sizes are often required in Mendelian randomization investigations. Methods and results: Resources are provided for investigators to perform sample size and power calculations for Mendelian randomization with a binary outcome. We initially provide formulae for the continuous outcome case, and then analogous formulae for the binary outcome case. The formulae are valid for a single instrumental variable, which may be a single genetic variant or an allele score comprising multiple variants. Graphs are provided to give the required sample size for 80% power for given values of the causal effect of the risk factor on the outcome and of the squared correlation between the risk factor and instrumental variable. R code and an online calculator tool are made available for calculating the sample size needed for a chosen power level given these parameters, as well as the power given the chosen sample size and these parameters. Conclusions: The sample size required for a given power of Mendelian randomization investigation depends greatly on the proportion of variance in the risk factor explained by the instrumental variable. The inclusion of multiple variants into an allele score to explain more of the variance in the risk factor will improve power, however care must be taken not to introduce bias by the inclusion of invalid variants.
引用
收藏
页码:922 / 929
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Challenge in interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies using lactase persistence as instrumental variable
    Vissers, L. E. T.
    van der Schouw, Y. T.
    Sluijs, I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2018, 72 (01) : 179 - 180
  • [22] Is Mendelian randomization 'lost in translation?': Comments on 'Mendelian randomization equals instrumental variable analysis with genetic instruments' by Wehby et al.
    Lawlor, Debbie A.
    Windmeijer, Frank
    Smith, George Davey
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (15) : 2750 - 2755
  • [23] Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates
    Stephen Burgess
    Jeremy A. Labrecque
    [J]. European Journal of Epidemiology, 2018, 33 : 947 - 952
  • [24] Mendelian randomization with a binary exposure variable: interpretation and presentation of causal estimates
    Burgess, Stephen
    Labrecque, Jeremy A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 33 (10) : 947 - 952
  • [25] Testing concordance of instrumental variable effects in generalized linear models with application to Mendelian randomization
    Dai, James Y.
    Chan, Kwun Chuen Gary
    Hsu, Li
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (23) : 3986 - 4007
  • [26] Response to 'Challenge in interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies using lactase persistence as instrumental variable'
    Q Yang
    C M Schooling
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2018, 72 : 181 - 182
  • [27] Response to 'Challenge in interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies using lactase persistence as instrumental variable'
    Yang, Q.
    Schooling, C. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2018, 72 (01) : 181 - 182
  • [28] MR-BOIL: Causal inference in one-sample Mendelian randomization for binary outcome with integrated likelihood method
    Shi, Dapeng
    Wang, Yuquan
    Zhang, Ziyong
    Cao, Yunlong
    Hu, Yue-Qing
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 47 (04) : 332 - 357
  • [29] Sample size calculations for clustered binary data
    Jung, SH
    Kang, SH
    Ahn, C
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (13) : 1971 - 1982
  • [30] Power calculation for the general two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis
    Deng, Lu
    Zhang, Han
    Yu, Kai
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 44 (03) : 290 - 299