Sample size and power calculations in Mendelian randomization with a single instrumental variable and a binary outcome

被引:398
|
作者
Burgess, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge CB1 8RN, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Mendelian randomization; sample size; power; binary outcome; allele score; CAUSAL ODDS RATIO; WEAK INSTRUMENTS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1093/ije/dyu005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Sample size calculations are an important tool for planning epidemiological studies. Large sample sizes are often required in Mendelian randomization investigations. Methods and results: Resources are provided for investigators to perform sample size and power calculations for Mendelian randomization with a binary outcome. We initially provide formulae for the continuous outcome case, and then analogous formulae for the binary outcome case. The formulae are valid for a single instrumental variable, which may be a single genetic variant or an allele score comprising multiple variants. Graphs are provided to give the required sample size for 80% power for given values of the causal effect of the risk factor on the outcome and of the squared correlation between the risk factor and instrumental variable. R code and an online calculator tool are made available for calculating the sample size needed for a chosen power level given these parameters, as well as the power given the chosen sample size and these parameters. Conclusions: The sample size required for a given power of Mendelian randomization investigation depends greatly on the proportion of variance in the risk factor explained by the instrumental variable. The inclusion of multiple variants into an allele score to explain more of the variance in the risk factor will improve power, however care must be taken not to introduce bias by the inclusion of invalid variants.
引用
收藏
页码:922 / 929
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Genetic instrumental variable analysis: time to call mendelian randomization what it is. The example of alcohol and cardiovascular disease
    Kenneth J. Mukamal
    Meir J. Stampfer
    Eric B. Rimm
    [J]. European Journal of Epidemiology, 2020, 35 : 93 - 97
  • [42] Genetic instrumental variable analysis: time to call mendelian randomization what it is. The example of alcohol and cardiovascular disease
    Mukamal, Kenneth J.
    Stampfer, Meir J.
    Rimm, Eric B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 35 (02) : 93 - 97
  • [44] The use of two-sample methods for Mendelian randomization analyses on single large datasets
    Minelli, Cosetta
    Del Greco, Fabiola M.
    van der Plaat, Diana A.
    Bowden, Jack
    Sheehan, Nuala A.
    Thompson, John
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 50 (05) : 1651 - 1659
  • [45] Sample size considerations for stratified cluster randomization design with binary outcomes and varying cluster size
    Xu, Xiaohan
    Zhu, Hong
    Ahn, Chul
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (18) : 3395 - 3404
  • [46] Semiparametric methods for estimation of a nonlinear exposure-outcome relationship using instrumental variables with application to Mendelian randomization
    Staley, James R.
    Burgess, Stephen
    [J]. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 41 (04) : 341 - 352
  • [47] Using the sample range as a basis for calculating sample size in power calculations
    Browne, RH
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2001, 55 (04): : 293 - 298
  • [48] Sample size and power calculations in repeated measurement analysis
    Ahn, C
    Overall, JE
    Tonidandel, S
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2001, 64 (02) : 121 - 124
  • [49] Power and sample size calculations using Microsoft® Excel
    O'Neill, ME
    Thomson, PC
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1998, 38 (06): : 617 - 622
  • [50] Power and Sample Size Calculations for Contrast Analysis in ANCOVA
    Shieh, Gwowen
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2017, 52 (01) : 1 - 11