Inter- versus Intracity Variations in the Performance and Calibration of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors: A Multicity Assessment in India

被引:4
|
作者
Sreekanth, V [1 ]
Bhargav, R. Ajay [2 ]
Kulkarni, Padmavati [1 ]
Puttaswamy, Naveen [3 ]
Prabhu, Vignesh [1 ]
Agrawal, Pratyush [1 ]
Upadhya, Adithi R. [2 ]
Rao, Sofiya [4 ]
Sutaria, Ronak
Mor, Suman [4 ,5 ]
Dey, Sagnik
Khaiwal, Ravindra [6 ]
Balakrishnan, Kalpana [3 ]
Tripathi, Sachchida Nand [7 ]
Singh, Pratima [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Study Sci Technol & Policy, Bengaluru 560094, India
[2] ILK Labs, Bengaluru 560046, India
[3] Sri Ramachandra Inst Higher Educ & Res, Fac Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Engn, Chennai 600116, India
[4] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Ctr Atmospher Sci, New Delhi 110016, Delhi, India
[5] Panjab Univ, Dept Environm Studies, Chandigarh 160014, India
[6] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Community Med, Chandigarh 160012, India
[7] Indian Inst Technol Kanpur, Dept Civil Engn, Kanpur 208016, India
来源
ACS EARTH AND SPACE CHEMISTRY | 2022年 / 6卷 / 12期
关键词
collocation; attenuation monitor; generalized additive model; linear mixed-effects model; root-mean-square error; PARTICULATE MATTER; AIR-POLLUTION; DELHI; QUALITY; AEROSOL; EMISSIONS; IMPACTS; PM10;
D O I
10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00257
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Low-cost sensors (LCSs) have revolutionized the air pollution monitoring landscape. However, the sensitivities of particulate matter (PM) LCS measurements to various particle microphysical properties and meteorological aspects warrant an accuracy investigation. We investigated the inter-and intracity variations in the accuracy of LCS-measured PM2.5 across geographically and demographically distinct Indian cities. The collocation data of PM2.5 (collected during March-April 2022) from an LCS (Atmos) and a reference-grade instrument (beta attenuation monitor) from nine sites (across five cities) were analyzed. The root-mean -square error (RMSE) in the hourly mean raw (uncorrected) Atmos PM2.5 measurements varied significantly across the cities. The Atmos PM2.5 overestimated the reference-grade PM2.5 values in cities located in the Indo-Gangetic Plain (Chandigarh and New Delhi) but considerably underestimated the values in the city located in western India (Mumbai). In south Indian cities (Bengaluru and Chennai), the Atmos PM2.5 measurements were relatively close to the reference-grade PM2.5 measurements. Among various statistical calibration models trained to correct the Atmos PM2.5 measurements for most locations, a generalized additive model performed better than other models. The performance of the calibration models was investigated using the holdout cross-validation method. The correction models improved the accuracy of the Atmos PM2.5 measurements by up to 70%. The bias range of the intracity (Mumbai) raw Atmos PM2.5 measurements was approximately comparable to the intercity bias range. Across the study locations, the generalized additive model performed the best in correcting the raw LCS PM2.5 measurements. We also demonstrated that the application of the location-specific calibration model to correct Atmos PM2.5 measurements improved the accuracy of the LCS PM2.5 measurements compared with the application of a single-location calibration model for city-wide data.
引用
收藏
页码:3007 / 3016
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Towards a hygroscopic growth calibration for low-cost PM2.5 sensors
    Patel, Milan Y.
    Vannucci, Pietro F.
    Kim, Jinsol
    Berelson, William M.
    Cohen, Ronald C.
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2024, 17 (03) : 1051 - 1060
  • [2] Spatial calibration and PM2.5 mapping of low-cost air quality sensors
    Chu, Hone-Jay
    Ali, Muhammad Zeeshan
    He, Yu-Chen
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [3] Concentration-Temporal Multilevel Calibration of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors
    Day, Rong-Fuh
    Yin, Peng-Yeng
    Huang, Yuh-Chin T.
    Wang, Cheng-Yi
    Tsai, Chih-Chun
    Yu, Cheng-Hsien
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [4] Spatial calibration and PM2.5 mapping of low-cost air quality sensors
    Hone-Jay Chu
    Muhammad Zeeshan Ali
    Yu-Chen He
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 10
  • [5] LOW-PROCESSING DATA ENRICHMENT AND CALIBRATION FOR PM2.5 LOW-COST SENSORS
    Stojanovi, Danka B.
    Kleut, Duska N.
    Davidovi, Milos D.
    De Vito, Saverio
    Jovasevi-Stojanovi, Milena, V
    Bartonova, Alena
    Lepioufle, Jean-Marie
    [J]. THERMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 27 (3B): : 2229 - 2240
  • [6] Low-cost PM2.5 Sensors: An Assessment of their Suitability for Various Applications
    Jayaratne, Rohan
    Liu, Xiaoting
    Ahn, Kang-Ho
    Asumadu-Sakyi, Akwasi
    Fisher, Gavin
    Gao, Jian
    Mabon, Adrian
    Mazaheri, Mandana
    Mullins, Benjamin
    Nyaku, Mawutorli
    Ristovski, Zoran
    Scorgie, Yvonne
    Phong Thai
    Dunbabin, Matthew
    Morawska, Lidia
    [J]. AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (03) : 520 - 532
  • [7] Evaluating the Performance of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors in Mobile Settings
    deSouza, Priyanka
    Wang, An
    Machida, Yuki
    Duhl, Tiffany
    Mora, Simone
    Kumar, Prashant
    Kahn, Ralph
    Ratti, Carlo
    Durant, John L.
    Hudda, Neelakshi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 57 (41) : 15401 - 15411
  • [8] A System Calibration Model for Mobile PM2.5 Sensing Using Low-Cost Sensors
    Liu, Hao-Min
    Wu, Hsuan-Cho
    Lee, Hu-Chen
    Ho, Yao-Hua
    Chen, Ling-Jyh
    [J]. 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNET OF THINGS (ITHINGS) AND IEEE GREEN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS (GREENCOM) AND IEEE CYBER, PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL COMPUTING (CPSCOM) AND IEEE SMART DATA (SMARTDATA), 2017, : 611 - 618
  • [9] Domain Adaptation-Based Deep Calibration of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors
    Jha, Sonu Kumar
    Kumar, Mohit
    Arora, Vipul
    Tripathi, Sachchida Nand
    Motghare, Vidyanand Motiram
    Shingare, A. A.
    Rajput, Karansingh A.
    Kamble, Sneha
    [J]. IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (22) : 25941 - 25949
  • [10] Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors for Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring
    Badura, Marek
    Batog, Piotr
    Drzeniecka-Osiadacz, Anetta
    Modzel, Piotr
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SENSORS, 2018, 2018