Inter- versus Intracity Variations in the Performance and Calibration of Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors: A Multicity Assessment in India

被引:4
|
作者
Sreekanth, V [1 ]
Bhargav, R. Ajay [2 ]
Kulkarni, Padmavati [1 ]
Puttaswamy, Naveen [3 ]
Prabhu, Vignesh [1 ]
Agrawal, Pratyush [1 ]
Upadhya, Adithi R. [2 ]
Rao, Sofiya [4 ]
Sutaria, Ronak
Mor, Suman [4 ,5 ]
Dey, Sagnik
Khaiwal, Ravindra [6 ]
Balakrishnan, Kalpana [3 ]
Tripathi, Sachchida Nand [7 ]
Singh, Pratima [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Study Sci Technol & Policy, Bengaluru 560094, India
[2] ILK Labs, Bengaluru 560046, India
[3] Sri Ramachandra Inst Higher Educ & Res, Fac Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Engn, Chennai 600116, India
[4] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Ctr Atmospher Sci, New Delhi 110016, Delhi, India
[5] Panjab Univ, Dept Environm Studies, Chandigarh 160014, India
[6] Post Grad Inst Med Educ & Res, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Community Med, Chandigarh 160012, India
[7] Indian Inst Technol Kanpur, Dept Civil Engn, Kanpur 208016, India
来源
ACS EARTH AND SPACE CHEMISTRY | 2022年 / 6卷 / 12期
关键词
collocation; attenuation monitor; generalized additive model; linear mixed-effects model; root-mean-square error; PARTICULATE MATTER; AIR-POLLUTION; DELHI; QUALITY; AEROSOL; EMISSIONS; IMPACTS; PM10;
D O I
10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00257
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Low-cost sensors (LCSs) have revolutionized the air pollution monitoring landscape. However, the sensitivities of particulate matter (PM) LCS measurements to various particle microphysical properties and meteorological aspects warrant an accuracy investigation. We investigated the inter-and intracity variations in the accuracy of LCS-measured PM2.5 across geographically and demographically distinct Indian cities. The collocation data of PM2.5 (collected during March-April 2022) from an LCS (Atmos) and a reference-grade instrument (beta attenuation monitor) from nine sites (across five cities) were analyzed. The root-mean -square error (RMSE) in the hourly mean raw (uncorrected) Atmos PM2.5 measurements varied significantly across the cities. The Atmos PM2.5 overestimated the reference-grade PM2.5 values in cities located in the Indo-Gangetic Plain (Chandigarh and New Delhi) but considerably underestimated the values in the city located in western India (Mumbai). In south Indian cities (Bengaluru and Chennai), the Atmos PM2.5 measurements were relatively close to the reference-grade PM2.5 measurements. Among various statistical calibration models trained to correct the Atmos PM2.5 measurements for most locations, a generalized additive model performed better than other models. The performance of the calibration models was investigated using the holdout cross-validation method. The correction models improved the accuracy of the Atmos PM2.5 measurements by up to 70%. The bias range of the intracity (Mumbai) raw Atmos PM2.5 measurements was approximately comparable to the intercity bias range. Across the study locations, the generalized additive model performed the best in correcting the raw LCS PM2.5 measurements. We also demonstrated that the application of the location-specific calibration model to correct Atmos PM2.5 measurements improved the accuracy of the LCS PM2.5 measurements compared with the application of a single-location calibration model for city-wide data.
引用
收藏
页码:3007 / 3016
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Long-term evaluation and calibration of three types of low-cost PM2.5 sensors at different air quality monitoring stations
    Hong, Gung-Hwa
    Le, Thi-Cuc
    Tu, Jing-Wei
    Wang, Chieh
    Chang, Shuenn-Chin
    Yu, Jhih-Yuan
    Lin, Guan-Yu
    Aggarwal, Shankar G.
    Tsai, Chuen-Jinn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2021, 157
  • [42] Determining PM2.5 calibration curves for a low-cost particle monitor: common indoor residential aerosols
    Dacunto, Philip J.
    Klepeis, Neil E.
    Cheng, Kai-Chung
    Acevedo-Bolton, Viviana
    Jiang, Ruo-Ting
    Repace, James L.
    Ott, Wayne R.
    Hildemann, Lynn M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2015, 17 (11) : 1959 - 1966
  • [43] Feasibility of Using Low-Cost Sensors to Monitor Personal Exposure to PM2.5 Among People with Asthma
    Xie, S.
    Meeker, J.
    Perez, L.
    Eriksen, W.
    Bocage, C.
    Ndicu, G.
    Localio, A.
    Park, H.
    Jen, A.
    Goldstein, M.
    Christie, C.
    Greenblatt, R.
    Barg, F.
    Apter, A. J.
    Himes, B. E.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 201
  • [44] Real-Time PM2.5 Monitoring in a Diesel Generator Workshop Using Low-Cost Sensors
    Feng, Zikang
    Zheng, Lina
    Liu, Lingyu
    Zhang, Wenli
    [J]. ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (11)
  • [45] Evaluating low-cost monitoring designs for PM2.5 exposure assessment with a spatiotemporal modeling approach
    Bi, Jianzhao
    Burnham, Dustin
    Zuidema, Christopher
    Schumacher, Cooper
    Gassett, Amanda J.
    Szpiro, Adam A.
    Kaufman, Joel D.
    Sheppard, Lianne
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2024, 343
  • [46] One year evaluation of three low-cost PM2.5 monitors
    Zamora, Misti Levy
    Rice, Jessica
    Koehler, Kirsten
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 235
  • [47] An efficient spatiotemporal data calibration approach for the low-cost PM2.5 sensing network: A case study in Taiwan
    Lee, Chieh-Han
    Wang, Yeuh-Bin
    Yu, Hwa-Lung
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 130
  • [48] Environmental justice analysis of wildfire-related PM2.5 exposure using low-cost sensors in California
    Kramer, Amber L.
    Liu, Jonathan
    Li, Liqiao
    Connolly, Rachel
    Barbato, Michele
    Zhu, Yifang
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 856
  • [49] Calibrating low-cost sensors using MERRA-2 reconstructed PM2.5 mass concentration as a proxy
    Malyan, Vasudev
    Kumar, Vikas
    Sahu, Manoranjan
    Prakash, Jai
    Choudhary, Shruti
    Raliya, Ramesh
    Chadha, Tandeep S.
    Fang, Jiaxi
    Biswas, Pratim
    [J]. ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (03)
  • [50] Development of a PM2.5 Forecasting System Integrating Low-cost Sensors for Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
    Nguyen Ky Phung
    Nguyen Quang Long
    Nguyen Van Tin
    Dang Thi Thanh Le
    [J]. AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (06) : 1454 - 1468