Predicted osteotomy planes are accurate when using patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in cadavers: a descriptive analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Kievit, A. J. [1 ,2 ]
Dobbe, J. G. G. [3 ]
Streekstra, G. J. [3 ]
Blankevoort, L. [1 ]
Schafroth, M. U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Orthopaed Res Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Orthopaed Surg,Amsterdam Movement Sci, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Tergooi Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Hilversum, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Engn & Phys, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Total knee arthroplasty; Biomet Signature; patient-specific instrumentation; Accuracy study; 3D Analysis; CT; REPLACEMENT; NAVIGATION; GUIDES; ALIGNMENT; SURGERY; SYSTEM; TKA;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-017-4721-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Malalignment of implants is a major source of failure during total knee arthroplasty. To achieve more accurate 3D planning and execution of the osteotomy cuts during surgery, the Signature (Biomet, Warsaw) patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was used to produce pin guides for the positioning of the osteotomy blocks by means of computer-aided manufacture based on CT scan images. The research question of this study is: what is the transfer accuracy of osteotomy planes predicted by the Signature PSI system for preoperative 3D planning and intraoperative block-guided pin placement to perform total knee arthroplasty procedures? The transfer accuracy achieved by using the Signature PSI system was evaluated by comparing the osteotomy planes predicted preoperatively with the osteotomy planes seen intraoperatively in human cadaveric legs. Outcomes were measured in terms of translational and rotational errors (varus, valgus, flexion, extension and axial rotation) for both tibia and femur osteotomies. Average translational errors between the osteotomy planes predicted using the Signature system and the actual osteotomy planes achieved was 0.8 mm (+/- 0.5 mm) for the tibia and 0.7 mm (+/- 4.0 mm) for the femur. Average rotational errors in relation to predicted and achieved osteotomy planes were 0.1A degrees (+/- 1.2A degrees) of varus and 0.4A degrees (+/- 1.7A degrees) of anterior slope (extension) for the tibia, and 2.8A degrees (+/- 2.0A degrees) of varus and 0.9A degrees (+/- 2.7A degrees) of flexion and 1.4A degrees (+/- 2.2A degrees) of external rotation for the femur. The similarity between osteotomy planes predicted using the Signature system and osteotomy planes actually achieved was excellent for the tibia although some discrepancies were seen for the femur. The use of 3D system techniques in TKA surgery can provide accurate intraoperative guidance, especially for patients with deformed bone, tailored to individual patients and ensure better placement of the implant.
引用
收藏
页码:1751 / 1758
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation
    Sébastien Parratte
    Guillaume Blanc
    Thomas Boussemart
    Matthieu Ollivier
    Thomas Le Corroller
    Jean-Noël Argenson
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2013, 21 : 2213 - 2219
  • [32] Patient-Specific Instrumentation Affects Perioperative Blood Loss in Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Cucchi, Davide
    Menon, Alessandra
    Zanini, Beatrice
    Compagnoni, Riccardo
    Ferrua, Paolo
    Randelli, Pietro
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2019, 32 (06) : 483 - 489
  • [33] Review Article: Patient-specific versus standard instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty
    Sharareh, Behnam
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2015, 23 (01) : 100 - 106
  • [34] Systematic Review of Patient-specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: New but Not Improved
    Sassoon, Adam
    Nam, Denis
    Nunley, Ryan
    Barrack, Robert
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 473 (01) : 151 - 158
  • [35] Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation
    Parratte, Sebastien
    Blanc, Guillaume
    Boussemart, Thomas
    Ollivier, Matthieu
    Le Corroller, Thomas
    Argenson, Jean-Noel
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2013, 21 (10) : 2213 - 2219
  • [36] Patient-specific Instruments for Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Lachiewicz, Paul F.
    Henderson, Robert A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2013, 21 (09) : 513 - 518
  • [37] Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: simpler, faster and more accurate than standard instrumentation-a randomized controlled trial
    Vide, Joao
    Freitas, Tania Pinto
    Ramos, Acacio
    Cruz, Henrique
    Sousa, Joao Paulo
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (08) : 2616 - 2621
  • [38] MRI is more accurate than CT for patient-specific total knee arthroplasty
    Frye, Benjamin M.
    Najim, Amjad A.
    Adams, Joanne B.
    Berend, Keith R.
    Lombardi, Adolph V., Jr.
    KNEE, 2015, 22 (06): : 609 - 612
  • [39] Patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty
    Lombardi, Adolph V., Jr.
    Berend, Keith R.
    Adams, Joanne B.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 31 (09) : 927 - 930
  • [40] Patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty
    Conteduca, Fabio
    Iorio, Raffaele
    Mazza, Daniele
    Ferretti, Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (02) : 259 - 265