Predicted osteotomy planes are accurate when using patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in cadavers: a descriptive analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Kievit, A. J. [1 ,2 ]
Dobbe, J. G. G. [3 ]
Streekstra, G. J. [3 ]
Blankevoort, L. [1 ]
Schafroth, M. U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Orthopaed Res Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Orthopaed Surg,Amsterdam Movement Sci, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Tergooi Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Hilversum, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Engn & Phys, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Total knee arthroplasty; Biomet Signature; patient-specific instrumentation; Accuracy study; 3D Analysis; CT; REPLACEMENT; NAVIGATION; GUIDES; ALIGNMENT; SURGERY; SYSTEM; TKA;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-017-4721-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Malalignment of implants is a major source of failure during total knee arthroplasty. To achieve more accurate 3D planning and execution of the osteotomy cuts during surgery, the Signature (Biomet, Warsaw) patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) was used to produce pin guides for the positioning of the osteotomy blocks by means of computer-aided manufacture based on CT scan images. The research question of this study is: what is the transfer accuracy of osteotomy planes predicted by the Signature PSI system for preoperative 3D planning and intraoperative block-guided pin placement to perform total knee arthroplasty procedures? The transfer accuracy achieved by using the Signature PSI system was evaluated by comparing the osteotomy planes predicted preoperatively with the osteotomy planes seen intraoperatively in human cadaveric legs. Outcomes were measured in terms of translational and rotational errors (varus, valgus, flexion, extension and axial rotation) for both tibia and femur osteotomies. Average translational errors between the osteotomy planes predicted using the Signature system and the actual osteotomy planes achieved was 0.8 mm (+/- 0.5 mm) for the tibia and 0.7 mm (+/- 4.0 mm) for the femur. Average rotational errors in relation to predicted and achieved osteotomy planes were 0.1A degrees (+/- 1.2A degrees) of varus and 0.4A degrees (+/- 1.7A degrees) of anterior slope (extension) for the tibia, and 2.8A degrees (+/- 2.0A degrees) of varus and 0.9A degrees (+/- 2.7A degrees) of flexion and 1.4A degrees (+/- 2.2A degrees) of external rotation for the femur. The similarity between osteotomy planes predicted using the Signature system and osteotomy planes actually achieved was excellent for the tibia although some discrepancies were seen for the femur. The use of 3D system techniques in TKA surgery can provide accurate intraoperative guidance, especially for patients with deformed bone, tailored to individual patients and ensure better placement of the implant.
引用
收藏
页码:1751 / 1758
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicted osteotomy planes are accurate when using patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in cadavers: a descriptive analysis
    A. J. Kievit
    J. G. G. Dobbe
    G. J. Streekstra
    L. Blankevoort
    M. U. Schafroth
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2018, 26 : 1751 - 1758
  • [2] Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty
    Leon-Munoz, Vicente J.
    Martinez-Martinez, Francisco
    Lopez-Lopez, Mirian
    Santonja-Medina, Fernando
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2019, 16 (07) : 555 - 567
  • [3] Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty
    Mathis, Dominic T.
    Hirschmann, Michael T.
    ARTHROSKOPIE, 2021, 34 (05) : 342 - 350
  • [4] Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Jauregui, Julio J.
    Cherian, Jeffrey J.
    Kapadia, Bhaveen H.
    Banerjee, Samik
    Issa, Kimona
    Harwin, Steven F.
    Mont, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2014, 27 (03) : 177 - 183
  • [5] Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Review
    Nam, Denis
    McArthur, Benjamin A.
    Cross, Michael B.
    Pearle, Andrew D.
    Mayman, David J.
    Haas, Steven B.
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2012, 25 (03) : 213 - 219
  • [6] Total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instrumentation for osteoarthritis of the knee: a meta-analysis
    Kizaki, Kazuha
    Shanmugaraj, Ajaykumar
    Yamashita, Fumiharu
    Simunovic, Nicole
    Duong, Andrew
    Khanna, Vickas
    Ayeni, Olufemi R.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2019, 20 (01)
  • [7] Total knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instrumentation for osteoarthritis of the knee: a meta-analysis
    Kazuha Kizaki
    Ajaykumar Shanmugaraj
    Fumiharu Yamashita
    Nicole Simunovic
    Andrew Duong
    Vickas Khanna
    Olufemi R. Ayeni
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20
  • [8] Patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty
    Chan, Warwick Chun-Wang
    Pinder, Elizabeth
    Loeffler, Mark
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2016, 24 (02) : 175 - 178
  • [9] Patient-specific instrumentation and custom total knee implants in total knee arthroplasty
    Isaacson, Mark
    Bunn, Kevin
    Incavo, Stephen
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2015, 26 (03): : 224 - 227
  • [10] Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a literature review
    Camarda L.
    D’Arienzo A.
    Morello S.
    Peri G.
    Valentino B.
    D’Arienzo M.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2015, 99 (1) : 11 - 18