Isolated Abdominal Circumference < 5% or Estimated Fetal Weight 10 to 19% as Predictors of Small for Gestational Age Infants

被引:8
|
作者
Turitz, Amy L. [1 ]
Quant, Hayley [1 ]
Schwartz, Nadav [1 ]
Elovitz, Michal [1 ]
Bastek, Jamie A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Perelman Sch Med, Maternal & Child Hlth Res Program, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
abdominal circumference; estimated fetal weight; intrauterine growth restriction; small for gestational age; ultrasound; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION; ULTRASOUND; RETARDATION; DIAGNOSIS; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1055/s-0033-1353438
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine whether (1) isolated fetal abdominal circumference < 5% (AC5) in absence of growth restriction (estimated fetal weight < 10% [EFW10]) or (2) borderline fetal growth 10 to 19% (EFW10-19) predicts subsequent fetal and/or neonatal growth restriction. Study Design The authors performed a retrospective cohort study (January 2008 to December 2011) of women with singleton pregnancies between 26 and 36 weeks who had >= 1 growth ultrasound. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the association between isolated AC5 or EFW10-19 with both subsequent sonographic diagnosis of EFW10 and neonatal diagnosis of small for gestational age (SGA). Test characteristics were calculated. Results Out of the 10,642 pregnancies, prevalence of isolated AC5, EFW10-19, EFW10, and SGA were as follows: AC5, 5.31%; EFW10-19, 13.30%; EFW10, 7.95%; and SGA, 17.63%. While screening for SGA using EFW10 alone would miss 68.34% of SGA neonates, using isolated AC5 would identify an additional 16.15% of SGA neonates with a 3.7% false positive rate. Using EFW10-19 would identify an additional 40.20% of SGA neonates with a 9.0% false positive rate. Conclusion Fetuses with isolated AC5 or EFW10-19 are at an increased risk of growth restriction. Using isolated AC5 or composite EFW10-19 would identify SGA neonates that are missed using conventional sonographic definitions of growth restriction alone.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 475
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Using fetal abdominal circumference growth velocity in the prediction of adverse outcome in near-term small-for-gestational-age fetuses
    Cavallaro, A.
    Veglia, M.
    Svirko, E.
    Vannuccini, S.
    Volpe, G.
    Impey, L.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 52 (04) : 494 - 500
  • [42] Estimated weight centile as a predictor of perinatal outcome in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies with normal fetal and maternal Doppler indices
    Savchev, S.
    Figueras, F.
    Cruz-Martinez, R.
    Illa, M.
    Botet, F.
    Gratacos, E.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 39 (03) : 299 - 303
  • [43] The Accuracy of Sonographically Estimated Fetal Weight and Prediction of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancy-Comparison of the First and Second Twins
    Gawie-Rotman, Moran
    Menashe, Shoval
    Haggiag, Noa
    Shrim, Alon
    Hallak, Mordechai
    Gabbay-Benziv, Rinat
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (09)
  • [44] Impact of fetal growth restriction on body composition and hormonal status at birth in infants of small and appropriate weight for gestational age
    Verkauskiene, R.
    Beltrand, J.
    Claris, O.
    Chevenne, D.
    Deghmoun, S.
    Dorgeret, S.
    Alison, M.
    Gaucherand, P.
    Sibony, O.
    Levy-Marchal, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2007, 157 (05) : 605 - 612
  • [45] Catch-up growth of head circumference of very low birth weight, small for gestational age preterm infants and mental development to adulthood
    Brandt, I
    Sticker, EJ
    Lentze, MJ
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2003, 142 (05): : 463 - 468
  • [46] Small fetal abdominal circumference in the second trimester and subsequent low maternal plasma glucose after a glucose challenge test is associated with the delivery of a small-for-gestational age neonate
    Bienstock, J. L.
    Holcroft, C. J.
    Althaus, J.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 31 (05) : 517 - 519
  • [47] Enhancing Small-for-Gestational-Age Prediction: Multi-Country Validation of Nuchal Thickness, Estimated Fetal Weight, and Machine Learning Models
    Deng, Jiaxuan
    Sethi, Neha Sethi Ap Naresh
    Kamar, Azanna Ahmad
    Saaid, Rahmah
    Loo, Chu Kiong
    Mattar, Citra Nurfarah Zaini
    Jalil, Nurul Syazwani
    Saw, Shier Nee
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2025,
  • [48] Third trimester ultrasound estimated fetal weight for increasing prenatal prediction of small-for-gestational age newborns in low-risk pregnant women
    Martin-Palumbo, Giovanna
    Atanasova, Vangeliya Blagoeva
    Rego Tejeda, Maria Teresa
    Antolin Alvarado, Eugenia
    Bartha, Jose Luis
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (25): : 6721 - 6726
  • [49] Functional outcomes and participation in young adulthood for very preterm and very low birth weight infants:: The Dutch project on preterm and small for gestational age infants at 19 years of age
    Hille, Elysee T. M.
    Weisglas-Kuperus, Nynke
    van Goudoever, J. B.
    Jacobusse, Gert W.
    Ens-Dokkum, Martina H.
    de Groot, Laila
    Wit, Jan M.
    Geven, Wil B.
    Kok, Joke H.
    de Kleine, Martin J. K.
    Kollee, Louis A. A.
    Mulder, A. L. M.
    van Straaten, H. L. M.
    de Vries, Linda S.
    van Weissenbruch, Mirjam M.
    Verloove-Vanhorick, S. Pauline
    PEDIATRICS, 2007, 120 (03) : E587 - E595
  • [50] Fetal cardiac function in late-onset intrauterine growth restriction vs small-for-gestational age, as defined by estimated fetal weight, cerebroplacental ratio and uterine artery Doppler
    Perez-Cruz, M.
    Cruz-Lemini, M.
    Fernandez, M. T.
    Parra, J. A.
    Bartrons, J.
    Gomez-Roig, M. D.
    Crispi, F.
    Gratacos, E.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 46 (04) : 465 - 471