Isolated Abdominal Circumference < 5% or Estimated Fetal Weight 10 to 19% as Predictors of Small for Gestational Age Infants

被引:8
|
作者
Turitz, Amy L. [1 ]
Quant, Hayley [1 ]
Schwartz, Nadav [1 ]
Elovitz, Michal [1 ]
Bastek, Jamie A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Perelman Sch Med, Maternal & Child Hlth Res Program, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
abdominal circumference; estimated fetal weight; intrauterine growth restriction; small for gestational age; ultrasound; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION; ULTRASOUND; RETARDATION; DIAGNOSIS; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1055/s-0033-1353438
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine whether (1) isolated fetal abdominal circumference < 5% (AC5) in absence of growth restriction (estimated fetal weight < 10% [EFW10]) or (2) borderline fetal growth 10 to 19% (EFW10-19) predicts subsequent fetal and/or neonatal growth restriction. Study Design The authors performed a retrospective cohort study (January 2008 to December 2011) of women with singleton pregnancies between 26 and 36 weeks who had >= 1 growth ultrasound. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the association between isolated AC5 or EFW10-19 with both subsequent sonographic diagnosis of EFW10 and neonatal diagnosis of small for gestational age (SGA). Test characteristics were calculated. Results Out of the 10,642 pregnancies, prevalence of isolated AC5, EFW10-19, EFW10, and SGA were as follows: AC5, 5.31%; EFW10-19, 13.30%; EFW10, 7.95%; and SGA, 17.63%. While screening for SGA using EFW10 alone would miss 68.34% of SGA neonates, using isolated AC5 would identify an additional 16.15% of SGA neonates with a 3.7% false positive rate. Using EFW10-19 would identify an additional 40.20% of SGA neonates with a 9.0% false positive rate. Conclusion Fetuses with isolated AC5 or EFW10-19 are at an increased risk of growth restriction. Using isolated AC5 or composite EFW10-19 would identify SGA neonates that are missed using conventional sonographic definitions of growth restriction alone.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 475
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Can serial measurements of fetal abdominal circumference in the second trimester predict small for gestational age and late fetal-growth restrictions?
    Sahin, Mefkure Eraslan
    Madendag, Ilknur Col
    CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 45 (01): : 102 - 106
  • [32] A comparison of placental pathology between small for gestational age infants at &lt; 5 % versus 5-9 %
    Sandlin, Adam T.
    Magann, Everett F.
    Ounpraseuth, Songthip T.
    Hammad, Ibrahim A.
    Goodier, Christopher G.
    Thagard, Andrew S.
    Dahlke, Joshua D.
    Chang, Eugene Y.
    Quick, Charles M.
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 252 : 483 - 489
  • [33] Risk of small-for-gestational-age among pregnancies with an estimated fetal weight between the 10th to 20th percentile
    Ravangard, Samadh
    Leftwich, Heidi
    Schmidt, Bethany
    Hibbard, Judith
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01) : S102 - S103
  • [34] Influence of Pre-Pregnancy Underweight Body Mass Index on Fetal Abdominal Circumference, Estimated Weight, and Pregnancy Outcomes in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
    Kim, Minji
    Hur, Kyu-Yeon
    Choi, Suk-Joo
    Oh, Soo-Young
    Roh, Cheong-Rae
    DIABETES & METABOLISM JOURNAL, 2022, 46 (03) : 499 - 505
  • [35] Serial plotting of symphysis-fundal height and estimated fetal weight to improve the antenatal detection of infants small for gestational age: A cluster randomised trial
    Ego, Anne
    Monier, Isabelle
    Vilotitch, Antoine
    Kayem, Gilles
    Vayssiere, Christophe
    Verspyck, Eric
    Zeitlin, Jennifer
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 130 (07) : 729 - 739
  • [36] Combined Influence of Gestational Weight Gain and Estimated Fetal Weight on Risk Assessment for Small- or Large-for-Gestational-Age Birth Weight A Prospective Cohort Study
    Pugh, Sarah J.
    Hinkle, Stefanie N.
    Kim, Sungduk
    Albert, Paul S.
    Newman, Roger
    Grobman, William A.
    Wing, Deborah A.
    Grantz, Katherine L.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2018, 37 (04) : 935 - 940
  • [37] Competing-risks model for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate from estimated fetal weight at 19-24 weeks' gestation
    Papastefanou, I.
    Nowacka, U.
    Syngelaki, A.
    Dragoi, V.
    Karamanis, G.
    Wright, D.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 57 (06) : 917 - 924
  • [38] Detection of Small for Gestational Age Fetuses Using Customized Standards To Calculate Estimated Fetal Weight in Twin Gestations.
    Carreno, Carlos A.
    Mastrobattista, J. M.
    Kase, Benjamin A.
    Connealy, Brendan D.
    Blackwell, Sean C.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 19 (S3) : 147A - 147A
  • [39] Comparing the relation between ultrasound-estimated fetal weight and birthweight in cohort of small-for-gestational-age fetuses
    Stephens, Katie
    Al-Memar, Maya
    Beattie-Jones, Suzanne
    Dhanjal, Mandish
    Mappouridou, Stephanie
    Thorne, Elizabeth
    Lees, Christoph
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 98 (11) : 1435 - 1441
  • [40] Clinical Validation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Standards of Fetal Abdominal Circumference for the Prediction of Small-for-Gestational-Age Neonates in Italy
    Bellussi, Federica
    Cataneo, Ilaria
    Visentin, Silvia
    Simonazzi, Giuliana
    Lenzi, Jacopo
    Fantini, Maria Pia
    Mimmi, Stefano
    Cosmi, Erich
    Pilu, Gianluigi
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2017, 42 (03) : 198 - 203