Isolated Abdominal Circumference < 5% or Estimated Fetal Weight 10 to 19% as Predictors of Small for Gestational Age Infants

被引:8
|
作者
Turitz, Amy L. [1 ]
Quant, Hayley [1 ]
Schwartz, Nadav [1 ]
Elovitz, Michal [1 ]
Bastek, Jamie A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Perelman Sch Med, Maternal & Child Hlth Res Program, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
abdominal circumference; estimated fetal weight; intrauterine growth restriction; small for gestational age; ultrasound; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION; ULTRASOUND; RETARDATION; DIAGNOSIS; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1055/s-0033-1353438
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine whether (1) isolated fetal abdominal circumference < 5% (AC5) in absence of growth restriction (estimated fetal weight < 10% [EFW10]) or (2) borderline fetal growth 10 to 19% (EFW10-19) predicts subsequent fetal and/or neonatal growth restriction. Study Design The authors performed a retrospective cohort study (January 2008 to December 2011) of women with singleton pregnancies between 26 and 36 weeks who had >= 1 growth ultrasound. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the association between isolated AC5 or EFW10-19 with both subsequent sonographic diagnosis of EFW10 and neonatal diagnosis of small for gestational age (SGA). Test characteristics were calculated. Results Out of the 10,642 pregnancies, prevalence of isolated AC5, EFW10-19, EFW10, and SGA were as follows: AC5, 5.31%; EFW10-19, 13.30%; EFW10, 7.95%; and SGA, 17.63%. While screening for SGA using EFW10 alone would miss 68.34% of SGA neonates, using isolated AC5 would identify an additional 16.15% of SGA neonates with a 3.7% false positive rate. Using EFW10-19 would identify an additional 40.20% of SGA neonates with a 9.0% false positive rate. Conclusion Fetuses with isolated AC5 or EFW10-19 are at an increased risk of growth restriction. Using isolated AC5 or composite EFW10-19 would identify SGA neonates that are missed using conventional sonographic definitions of growth restriction alone.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 475
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Accuracy of ultrasound-estimated fetal weight in large for gestational age/macrosomic infants
    Redfearn, C.
    Brown, K.
    Ross, G.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 : 65 - 66
  • [22] Accuracy of Ultrasound Estimated Fetal Weight in Small for Gestational Age and Appropriate for Gestational Age Grown Periviable Neonates
    Haragan, Adriane
    Himes, Katherine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2018, 35 (08) : 703 - 706
  • [23] Suspicion of intrauterine growth restriction: Use of abdominal circumference alone or estimated fetal weight below 10%
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Cole, Jill
    Sanderson, Maureen
    Magann, Everett F.
    Scardo, James A.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2006, 19 (09): : 557 - 562
  • [24] The association between second trimester estimated fetal weight and small for gestational age at birth
    Fox, Nathan S.
    Gettenberg, Gabrielle
    Stern, Erica
    Schwartz, Joshua J.
    Kim, Renita
    Saltzman, Daniel H.
    Rebarber, Andrei
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (15): : 2398 - 2402
  • [25] Discrepancies between Ultrasound Based Composite Biometry for Estimated Fetal Weight and Abdominal Circumference Alone in Predicting Large for Gestational Age Fetuses and Newborns.
    Fouad, Lina
    Gonik, Bernard
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2021, 28 (SUPPL 1) : 147A - 147A
  • [26] Expanding the Estimated Fetal Weight Definition of Growth Restriction by Adding Small Abdominal Circumference Prediction of Neonatal Morbidity
    Shea, Ashley
    Battarbee, Ashley N.
    Grantz, Katherine L.
    He, Dian
    Owen, John
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [27] Fetal abdominal circumference (AC) of 35cm or greater predicts shoulder dystocia in fetuses presumed to have estimated fetal weight (EFW) appropriate for gestational age (AGA)
    Buikema, Tovah
    Murphy, June
    Kazzi, George
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 210 (01) : S119 - S119
  • [28] Comparing fetal biometric growth velocity versus estimated fetal weight for prediction of neonatal small for gestational age
    Price, Corley Rachelle
    Roeckner, Jared
    Odibo, Linda
    Odibo, Anthony
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (20): : 3931 - 3936
  • [29] ABDOMINAL DISTENSION IN VERY LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT, SMALL FOR GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS
    MIMOUNI, F
    HIRSH, M
    OVADIA, J
    REISNER, SH
    CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 1984, 23 (09) : 526 - 526
  • [30] Placental thickness-to-estimated foetal weight ratios and small-for-gestational-age infants at delivery
    Ahn, Ki Hoon
    Lee, Joo Hak
    Cho, Geum Joon
    Hong, Soon-Cheol
    Oh, Min-Jeong
    Kim, Hai-Joong
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 37 (07) : 883 - 887