Isolated Abdominal Circumference < 5% or Estimated Fetal Weight 10 to 19% as Predictors of Small for Gestational Age Infants

被引:8
|
作者
Turitz, Amy L. [1 ]
Quant, Hayley [1 ]
Schwartz, Nadav [1 ]
Elovitz, Michal [1 ]
Bastek, Jamie A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Perelman Sch Med, Maternal & Child Hlth Res Program, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
abdominal circumference; estimated fetal weight; intrauterine growth restriction; small for gestational age; ultrasound; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION; ULTRASOUND; RETARDATION; DIAGNOSIS; BIRTH;
D O I
10.1055/s-0033-1353438
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives To determine whether (1) isolated fetal abdominal circumference < 5% (AC5) in absence of growth restriction (estimated fetal weight < 10% [EFW10]) or (2) borderline fetal growth 10 to 19% (EFW10-19) predicts subsequent fetal and/or neonatal growth restriction. Study Design The authors performed a retrospective cohort study (January 2008 to December 2011) of women with singleton pregnancies between 26 and 36 weeks who had >= 1 growth ultrasound. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the association between isolated AC5 or EFW10-19 with both subsequent sonographic diagnosis of EFW10 and neonatal diagnosis of small for gestational age (SGA). Test characteristics were calculated. Results Out of the 10,642 pregnancies, prevalence of isolated AC5, EFW10-19, EFW10, and SGA were as follows: AC5, 5.31%; EFW10-19, 13.30%; EFW10, 7.95%; and SGA, 17.63%. While screening for SGA using EFW10 alone would miss 68.34% of SGA neonates, using isolated AC5 would identify an additional 16.15% of SGA neonates with a 3.7% false positive rate. Using EFW10-19 would identify an additional 40.20% of SGA neonates with a 9.0% false positive rate. Conclusion Fetuses with isolated AC5 or EFW10-19 are at an increased risk of growth restriction. Using isolated AC5 or composite EFW10-19 would identify SGA neonates that are missed using conventional sonographic definitions of growth restriction alone.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 475
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Isolated abdominal circumference &lt;5% is an independent risk factor for small for gestational age infants
    Turitz, Amy
    Quant, Hayley
    Schwartz, Nadav
    Elovitz, Michal
    Bastek, Jamie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S158 - S158
  • [2] Estimated fetal weight 10-19% is an independent risk factor for small for gestational age infants
    Turitz, Amy
    Quant, Hayley
    Schwartz, Nadav
    Elovitz, Michal
    Bastek, Jamie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 208 (01) : S157 - S158
  • [3] Predictive Value of Fetal Abdominal Circumference in Diagnosing Small for Gestational Age Infants
    Kopparam, Rohini
    Matthews, Kathy
    Khan, Rana
    Grossman, Tracy B.
    Gelber, Shari
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 17S - 18S
  • [4] Third trimester abdominal circumference, estimated fetal weight and uterine artery doppler for the identification of newborns small and large for gestational age
    Di Lorenzo, Giovanni
    Monasta, Lorenzo
    Ceccarello, Matteo
    Cecotti, Vera
    D'Ottavio, Giuseppina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2013, 166 (02) : 133 - 138
  • [5] Third trimester abdominal circumference alone is comparable to estimated fetal weight to predict small for gestational age at birth: a meta-analysis
    Blue, Nathan R.
    Perez, Jose M.
    Holbrook, Bradley D.
    Nirgudkar, Pranita A.
    Mozurkewich, Ellen L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : S151 - S152
  • [6] Predictive Value of Fetal Abdominal Circumference in Diagnosing Large for Gestational Age Infants
    Kopparam, Rohini
    Matthews, Kathy
    Khan, Rana
    Grossman, Tracy B.
    Gelber, Shari Ellen
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 43S - 44S
  • [7] The accuracy of ultrasound-estimated fetal weight in extremely preterm infants: a comparison of small for gestational age and appropriate for gestational age
    Stefanelli, Sergio
    Groom, Katie M.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 54 (02): : 126 - 131
  • [8] Is fetal abdominal circumference predictive of small for gestational age birthweight in twin pregnancies?
    Febres-Cordero, Daniela A.
    Ajayi, Ayodele
    Reforma, Liberty G.
    Trochtenberg, Alyssa L.
    Modest, Anna M.
    Spiel, Melissa H.
    Collier, Ai-Ris Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S626 - S626
  • [9] Isolated abdominal circumference vs. estimated fetal weight, which matters more?
    Ali, Fatima
    Canterino, Joseph
    Koscica, Karen
    DiStefano, Valeria
    Aikman, Noelle
    Faro, Jonathan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 228 (01) : S640 - S640
  • [10] Fetal abdominal circumference as an early marker in prediction of small for gestational age newborns
    Fuchs, Anna
    Heiselman, Cassandra
    Peralta, Leslie
    Gorman, Megan
    Umesh, Vaibhavi
    Abuzeid, Omar
    Garretto, Diana
    Herrera, Kimberly
    Hussain, Ayesha
    Garry, David
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S363 - S363