A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT

被引:18
|
作者
Langford, Rebecca [1 ]
Jago, Russell [2 ]
White, James [3 ]
Moore, Laurence [4 ]
Papadaki, Angeliki [2 ]
Hollingworth, William [5 ]
Metcalfe, Chris [5 ]
Ward, Dianne [6 ]
Campbell, Rona [7 ]
Wells, Sian [7 ]
Kipping, Ruth [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, DECIPHer, Oakfield House, Bristol BS8 2BN, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Policy Studies, Ctr Exercise Nutr & Hlth Sci, Social Sci Complex,8 Priory Rd, Bristol BS8 1TZ, Avon, England
[3] Cardiff Univ, Coll Biomed & Life Sci, DECIPHer, Ctr Trials Res, 4th Floor Hlth Pk, Cardiff CF14 4YS, S Glam, Wales
[4] Univ Glasgow, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, MRC CSO Social & Publ Hlth Sci Unit, 200 Renfield St, Glasgow G2 3AX, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Canynge Hall,39 Whatley Rd, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
[6] Univ N Carolina, Ctr Hlth Promot & Dis Prevent, Dept Nutr, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, 1700 MLK Jr Blvd 7426, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[7] Univ Bristol, DECIPHer, Bristol Med Sch, Canynge Hall,39 Whatley Rd, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Obesity; Physical activity; Nutrition; Oral health; Child care; Preschool children; Intervention; Process evaluation; Feasibility; CHILD-CARE; PRESCHOOL; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-019-7102-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The nutrition and physical activity self-assessment for childcare (NAP SACC) intervention has demonstrated effectiveness in the USA. A feasibility randomised controlled trial was conducted in England to adapt the intervention to the UK context. An embedded process evaluation focused on three key questions. 1. Was it feasible and acceptable to implement the intervention as planned? 2. How did the intervention affect staff and parent mediators? 3. Were the trial design and methods acceptable? Methods: Twelve nurseries in south-west England were recruited and randomised to intervention or control. The intervention comprised: NAP SACC UK Partner (Health Visitor) support to nurseries to review practice and policies against best practice, and then set goals to improve physical activity, nutrition and oral health; two staff training workshops; and a web-based parent support element. The process evaluation comprised: observations of Partner training (n = 1), Partner/manager meetings (n = 5) and staff workshops (n = 10); semi-structured interviews with Partners (n = 4), managers (n = 12), staff (n = 4) and parents (n = 20); analysis of self-assessment forms, goal setting forms and Partner logbooks; and assessment of staff and parent knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy mediators. Results: Overall, NAP SACC UK was feasible to implement and acceptable to nursery staff, managers, Partners and parents. The intervention was implemented as planned in five of the six intervention nurseries. Partners and managers appreciated the opportunity to review and improve nursery practices and valued the relationship forged between them. Staff rated the training workshops highly, despite attending outside of working hours. Most goals set by nurseries were achieved. However, Partners raised concerns about Health Visitors' capacity to deliver the intervention in any subsequent roll out. Mediator scores improved in all but two areas in intervention staff and parents, with decreases or minimal changes in the control group. The web-based parent element was not well used and should be removed from any subsequent trial. The trial methods were acceptable to managers, staff, Partners and parents. Conclusions: Implementing and evaluating a physical activity and nutrition intervention in nursery settings is feasible and acceptable. A full RCT of NAP SACC UK (with appropriate modifications) is warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [41] Pathways leading to success and non-success: a process evaluation of a cluster randomized physical activity health promotion program applying fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
    Christina Kien
    Ludwig Grillich
    Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit
    Rudolf Schoberberger
    BMC Public Health, 18
  • [42] Acceptability, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of scales to assess parental and nursery staff's self-efficacy, motivation and knowledge in relation to pre-school children's nutrition, oral health and physical activity
    Dias, Kaiseree
    White, James
    Metcalfe, Chris
    Kipping, Ruth
    Papadaki, Angeliki
    Jago, Russell
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2019, 22 (06) : 967 - 975
  • [43] Physical activity virtual intervention for improving mental health among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Co-creation process and evaluation using the Behavior Change Wheel
    Sofro, Zaenal Muttaqien
    Wibowo, Rakhmat Ari
    Wasityastuti, Widya
    Kusumadewi, Andrian Fajar
    Utomo, Prattama Santoso
    Ekawati, Fitriana Murriya
    Putri, Rayhani Erika
    Aldrin, Enrique
    Fatmawati, Jihan Santika
    Chang, Trisha Cheeren
    Pratista, Muhammad Ivan
    Agustiningsih, Denny
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (08)
  • [44] An 11-week school-based `health education through football programme' improves health knowledge related to hygiene, nutrition, physical activity and well-being-and it's fun! A scaled-up, cluster-RCT with over 3000 Danish school children aged 10-12 years old
    Larsen, Malte Nejst
    Elbe, Anne-Marie
    Madsen, Mads
    Madsen, Esben Elholm
    Orntoft, Christina
    Ryom, Knud
    Dvorak, Jiri
    Krustrup, Peter
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 55 (16) : 906 - 911