A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT

被引:18
|
作者
Langford, Rebecca [1 ]
Jago, Russell [2 ]
White, James [3 ]
Moore, Laurence [4 ]
Papadaki, Angeliki [2 ]
Hollingworth, William [5 ]
Metcalfe, Chris [5 ]
Ward, Dianne [6 ]
Campbell, Rona [7 ]
Wells, Sian [7 ]
Kipping, Ruth [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, DECIPHer, Oakfield House, Bristol BS8 2BN, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Policy Studies, Ctr Exercise Nutr & Hlth Sci, Social Sci Complex,8 Priory Rd, Bristol BS8 1TZ, Avon, England
[3] Cardiff Univ, Coll Biomed & Life Sci, DECIPHer, Ctr Trials Res, 4th Floor Hlth Pk, Cardiff CF14 4YS, S Glam, Wales
[4] Univ Glasgow, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, MRC CSO Social & Publ Hlth Sci Unit, 200 Renfield St, Glasgow G2 3AX, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Canynge Hall,39 Whatley Rd, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
[6] Univ N Carolina, Ctr Hlth Promot & Dis Prevent, Dept Nutr, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, 1700 MLK Jr Blvd 7426, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[7] Univ Bristol, DECIPHer, Bristol Med Sch, Canynge Hall,39 Whatley Rd, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Obesity; Physical activity; Nutrition; Oral health; Child care; Preschool children; Intervention; Process evaluation; Feasibility; CHILD-CARE; PRESCHOOL; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-019-7102-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The nutrition and physical activity self-assessment for childcare (NAP SACC) intervention has demonstrated effectiveness in the USA. A feasibility randomised controlled trial was conducted in England to adapt the intervention to the UK context. An embedded process evaluation focused on three key questions. 1. Was it feasible and acceptable to implement the intervention as planned? 2. How did the intervention affect staff and parent mediators? 3. Were the trial design and methods acceptable? Methods: Twelve nurseries in south-west England were recruited and randomised to intervention or control. The intervention comprised: NAP SACC UK Partner (Health Visitor) support to nurseries to review practice and policies against best practice, and then set goals to improve physical activity, nutrition and oral health; two staff training workshops; and a web-based parent support element. The process evaluation comprised: observations of Partner training (n = 1), Partner/manager meetings (n = 5) and staff workshops (n = 10); semi-structured interviews with Partners (n = 4), managers (n = 12), staff (n = 4) and parents (n = 20); analysis of self-assessment forms, goal setting forms and Partner logbooks; and assessment of staff and parent knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy mediators. Results: Overall, NAP SACC UK was feasible to implement and acceptable to nursery staff, managers, Partners and parents. The intervention was implemented as planned in five of the six intervention nurseries. Partners and managers appreciated the opportunity to review and improve nursery practices and valued the relationship forged between them. Staff rated the training workshops highly, despite attending outside of working hours. Most goals set by nurseries were achieved. However, Partners raised concerns about Health Visitors' capacity to deliver the intervention in any subsequent roll out. Mediator scores improved in all but two areas in intervention staff and parents, with decreases or minimal changes in the control group. The web-based parent element was not well used and should be removed from any subsequent trial. The trial methods were acceptable to managers, staff, Partners and parents. Conclusions: Implementing and evaluating a physical activity and nutrition intervention in nursery settings is feasible and acceptable. A full RCT of NAP SACC UK (with appropriate modifications) is warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [31] The Health and Sport Engagement Project: Findings from the design, outcome, process and economic evaluation of complex community sport intervention to increase physical activity and enhance health and wellbeing
    Mansfield, Louise
    Anokye, Nana
    Kay, Tess
    Fox-Rushby, Julia
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH, 2018, 15 (10): : S14 - S14
  • [32] Process evaluation of the Albany Physical Activity and Nutrition (APAN) program, a home-based intervention for metabolic syndrome and associated chronic disease risk in rural Australian adults
    Blackford, Krysten
    Lee, Andy
    James, Anthony P.
    Waddell, Tracy
    Hills, Andrew P.
    Anderson, Annie S.
    Howat, Peter
    Jancey, Jonine
    HEALTH PROMOTION JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2017, 28 (01) : 8 - 14
  • [33] Assessing the Acceptability of a Preschool-Based Multi-Component Physical Activity Intervention Entitled "I'm an Active Hero" (IAAH): Process Evaluation of a Feasibility Trial
    Al-walah, Mosfer A.
    Alotaibi, Shayek S.
    Alhusaini, Adel A.
    Alotiabi, Meteb M.
    Donnelly, Michael
    Heron, Neil
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (14)
  • [34] Evaluation of the Pragmatic Implementation of a Digital Health Intervention Promoting Healthy Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Gestational Weight Gain for Women Entering Pregnancy at a High Body Mass Index
    Wilkinson, Shelley A.
    Fjeldsoe, Brianna
    Willcox, Jane C.
    NUTRIENTS, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [35] Kids Out; evaluation of a brief multimodal cluster randomized intervention integrated in health education lessons to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior among eighth graders
    M. Aittasalo
    A-M Jussila
    K. Tokola
    H. Sievänen
    H. Vähä-Ypyä
    T. Vasankari
    BMC Public Health, 19
  • [36] Kids Out; evaluation of a brief multimodal cluster randomized intervention integrated in health education lessons to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior among eighth graders
    Aittasalo, M.
    Jussila, A-M
    Tokola, K.
    Sievanen, H.
    Vaha-Ypya, H.
    Vasankari, T.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [37] A Remotely Delivered, Peer-Led Physical Activity Intervention for Younger Breast Cancer Survivors (Pink Body Spirit): Protocol for a Feasibility Study and Mixed Methods Process Evaluation
    Weiner, Lauren S.
    Nagel, Stori
    Su, H. Irene
    Hurst, Samantha
    Hartman, Sheri J.
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2020, 9 (07):
  • [38] A mixed-methods process evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of involving community and peer role models within a physical activity intervention for primary-school-aged girls (the CHARMING study)
    Morgan, Kelly
    Van Godwin, Jordan
    Cannings-John, Rebecca
    Hallingberg, Britt
    Moore, Graham
    Pell, Bethan
    Whiteley, Holly
    Hawkins, Jemma
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [39] A mixed-methods process evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of involving community and peer role models within a physical activity intervention for primary-school-aged girls (the CHARMING study)
    Kelly Morgan
    Jordan Van Godwin
    Rebecca Cannings-John
    Britt Hallingberg
    Graham Moore
    Bethan Pell
    Holly Whiteley
    Jemma Hawkins
    BMC Public Health, 23
  • [40] Pathways leading to success and non-success: a process evaluation of a cluster randomized physical activity health promotion program applying fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
    Kien, Christina
    Grillich, Ludwig
    Nussbaumer-Streit, Barbara
    Schoberberger, Rudolf
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 18