A physical activity, nutrition and oral health intervention in nursery settings: process evaluation of the NAP SACC UK feasibility cluster RCT

被引:18
|
作者
Langford, Rebecca [1 ]
Jago, Russell [2 ]
White, James [3 ]
Moore, Laurence [4 ]
Papadaki, Angeliki [2 ]
Hollingworth, William [5 ]
Metcalfe, Chris [5 ]
Ward, Dianne [6 ]
Campbell, Rona [7 ]
Wells, Sian [7 ]
Kipping, Ruth [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, DECIPHer, Oakfield House, Bristol BS8 2BN, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Sch Policy Studies, Ctr Exercise Nutr & Hlth Sci, Social Sci Complex,8 Priory Rd, Bristol BS8 1TZ, Avon, England
[3] Cardiff Univ, Coll Biomed & Life Sci, DECIPHer, Ctr Trials Res, 4th Floor Hlth Pk, Cardiff CF14 4YS, S Glam, Wales
[4] Univ Glasgow, Inst Hlth & Wellbeing, MRC CSO Social & Publ Hlth Sci Unit, 200 Renfield St, Glasgow G2 3AX, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Univ Bristol, Bristol Med Sch, Canynge Hall,39 Whatley Rd, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
[6] Univ N Carolina, Ctr Hlth Promot & Dis Prevent, Dept Nutr, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, 1700 MLK Jr Blvd 7426, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[7] Univ Bristol, DECIPHer, Bristol Med Sch, Canynge Hall,39 Whatley Rd, Bristol BS8 2PS, Avon, England
基金
英国惠康基金; 英国医学研究理事会; 英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
Obesity; Physical activity; Nutrition; Oral health; Child care; Preschool children; Intervention; Process evaluation; Feasibility; CHILD-CARE; PRESCHOOL; OBESITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-019-7102-9
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: The nutrition and physical activity self-assessment for childcare (NAP SACC) intervention has demonstrated effectiveness in the USA. A feasibility randomised controlled trial was conducted in England to adapt the intervention to the UK context. An embedded process evaluation focused on three key questions. 1. Was it feasible and acceptable to implement the intervention as planned? 2. How did the intervention affect staff and parent mediators? 3. Were the trial design and methods acceptable? Methods: Twelve nurseries in south-west England were recruited and randomised to intervention or control. The intervention comprised: NAP SACC UK Partner (Health Visitor) support to nurseries to review practice and policies against best practice, and then set goals to improve physical activity, nutrition and oral health; two staff training workshops; and a web-based parent support element. The process evaluation comprised: observations of Partner training (n = 1), Partner/manager meetings (n = 5) and staff workshops (n = 10); semi-structured interviews with Partners (n = 4), managers (n = 12), staff (n = 4) and parents (n = 20); analysis of self-assessment forms, goal setting forms and Partner logbooks; and assessment of staff and parent knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy mediators. Results: Overall, NAP SACC UK was feasible to implement and acceptable to nursery staff, managers, Partners and parents. The intervention was implemented as planned in five of the six intervention nurseries. Partners and managers appreciated the opportunity to review and improve nursery practices and valued the relationship forged between them. Staff rated the training workshops highly, despite attending outside of working hours. Most goals set by nurseries were achieved. However, Partners raised concerns about Health Visitors' capacity to deliver the intervention in any subsequent roll out. Mediator scores improved in all but two areas in intervention staff and parents, with decreases or minimal changes in the control group. The web-based parent element was not well used and should be removed from any subsequent trial. The trial methods were acceptable to managers, staff, Partners and parents. Conclusions: Implementing and evaluating a physical activity and nutrition intervention in nursery settings is feasible and acceptable. A full RCT of NAP SACC UK (with appropriate modifications) is warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [21] A mixed methods process evaluation of a print-based intervention supported by internet tools to improve physical activity in UK cancer survivors
    Webb, J.
    Peel, J.
    Fife-Schaw, C.
    Ogden, J.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 175 : 19 - 27
  • [22] Action 3:30R: process evaluation of a cluster randomised feasibility study of a revised teaching assistant-led extracurricular physical activity intervention for 8 to 10 year olds
    Tibbitts, Byron
    Porter, Alice
    Sebire, Simon J.
    Bird, Emma L.
    Sanderson, Emily
    Metcalfe, Chris
    Powell, Jane E.
    Jago, Russell
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [23] Action 3:30R: process evaluation of a cluster randomised feasibility study of a revised teaching assistant-led extracurricular physical activity intervention for 8 to 10 year olds
    Byron Tibbitts
    Alice Porter
    Simon J. Sebire
    Emma L. Bird
    Emily Sanderson
    Chris Metcalfe
    Jane E. Powell
    Russell Jago
    BMC Public Health, 19
  • [24] The Health and Sport Engagement (HASE) Intervention and Evaluation Project: protocol for the design, outcome, process and economic evaluation of a complex community sport intervention to increase levels of physical activity
    Mansfield, Louise
    Anokye, Nana
    Fox-Rushby, Julia
    Kay, Tess
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (10):
  • [25] DIAMOND (DIgital Alcohol Management on Demand): A feasibility RCT and embedded process evaluation of a digital health intervention to reduce hazardous and harmful alcohol use recruiting in hospital emergency departments and online
    Hamilton F.L.
    Hornby J.
    Sheringham J.
    Linke S.
    Ashton C.
    Moore K.
    Stevenson F.
    Murray E.
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 4 (1)
  • [26] A digital health intervention to improve nutrition and physical activity in breast cancer survivors: Rationale and design of the Cook and Move for Your Life pilot and feasibility randomized controlled trial
    Ueland, Katherine
    Sanchez, Sofia Cobos
    Rillamas-Sun, Eileen
    Shen, Hanjie
    Schattenkerk, Liza
    Garcia, Gino
    VanDoren, Matthew
    Myers, Samantha A.
    Santiago-Torres, Margarita
    Di, Chongzhi
    Dey, Neelendu
    Guthrie, Katherine A.
    Yung, Rachel
    Davidson, Nancy E.
    Greenlee, Heather
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2022, 123
  • [27] What happened in the 'Move for Well-being in School': a process evaluation of a cluster randomized physical activity intervention using the RE-AIM framework
    Smedegaard, Soren
    Brondeel, Ruben
    Christiansen, Lars Breum
    Skovgaard, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2017, 14
  • [28] What happened in the ‘Move for Well-being in School’: a process evaluation of a cluster randomized physical activity intervention using the RE-AIM framework
    Søren Smedegaard
    Ruben Brondeel
    Lars Breum Christiansen
    Thomas Skovgaard
    International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 14
  • [29] Increasing children's physical activity through a teaching-assistant led extracurricular intervention: process evaluation of the action 3:30 randomised feasibility trial
    Jago, Russell
    Sebire, Simon J.
    Davies, Ben
    Wood, Lesley
    Banfield, Kathryn
    Edwards, Mark J.
    Powell, Jane E.
    Montgomery, Alan A.
    Thompson, Janice L.
    Fox, Kenneth R.
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2015, 15
  • [30] Increasing children’s physical activity through a teaching-assistant led extracurricular intervention: process evaluation of the action 3:30 randomised feasibility trial
    Russell Jago
    Simon J Sebire
    Ben Davies
    Lesley Wood
    Kathryn Banfield
    Mark J Edwards
    Jane E Powell
    Alan A Montgomery
    Janice L Thompson
    Kenneth R Fox
    BMC Public Health, 15