A system dynamics model for supporting decision-makers in irrigation water management

被引:72
|
作者
Pluchinotta, Irene [1 ]
Pagano, Alessandro [2 ]
Giordano, Raffaele [2 ]
Tsoukias, Alexis [1 ]
机构
[1] PSL Res Univ, Univ Paris Dauphine, LAMSADE CNRS, Pl Marechal Lattre de Tassigny, F-75016 Paris, France
[2] CNR, Water Res Inst, Viale Francesco do Blasio 5, I-70132 Bari, Italy
关键词
Water management; Participatory modelling; Decision analysis; System dynamics; Interactions space; Sustainability; GROUNDWATER PROTECTION; CONFLICT-ANALYSIS; RESOURCE; ACCEPTABILITY; SIMULATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.083
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Water management is a controversial environmental policy issue, due to the heterogeneity of interests associated with a shared resource and the increasing level of conflict among water uses and users. Nowadays, there is a cumulative interest in enhancing multi-stakeholder decision-making processes, overtaking binding mercantile business, in water management domain. This requires the development of dynamic decision-aiding tools able to integrate the different problem frames held by the decision makers, to clarify the differences, to support the creation of collaborative decision-making processes and to provide shared platforms of interactions. In literature, these issues are faced by concepts such as Ostrom's action arena and Ostanello-Tsoukias' interaction space (IS). The analysis of the interactions structure and of the different problem framing involved are fundamental premises for a successful debate for the management of a common-pool resource. Specifically, the present paper suggests a dynamic evolution of the IS, highlighting its criticalities. It develops an alternative perspective on the problem, using a System Dynamics Model (SDM), exploring how different actions can influence the decision-making processes of various stakeholders involved in the IS. The SDM has been implemented in a multi-stakeholders decision-making situation in order to support water management and groundwater protection in the agricultural systems in the Capitanata area (Apulia region, Southern Italy).
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 824
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] UbiGDSS: A theoretical model to predict decision-makers’ sat-isfaction
    Carneiro, João
    Santos, Ricardo
    Marreiros, Goreti
    Novais, Paulo
    International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 2015, 10 (07): : 191 - 200
  • [42] Belief Preference in Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Two Decision-Makers
    You, Hanlin
    Li, Mengjun
    Jiang, Jiang
    Ge, Bingfeng
    Zhang, Xueting
    Xu, Jianguo
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2016, : 1702 - 1707
  • [43] THE VALUE OF IRRIGATION INFORMATION FOR DECISION-MAKERS WITH NEUTRAL AND NONNEUTRAL RISK PREFERENCES UNDER CONDITIONS OF UNLIMITED AND LIMITED WATER-SUPPLY
    BOTES, JHF
    BOSCH, DJ
    OOSTHUIZEN, LK
    WATER SA, 1995, 21 (03) : 221 - 230
  • [44] GERMAN AND FRENCH DECISION-MAKERS AND THE ENTRY INTO THE WAR IN 1914: THE LESSONS OF A MODEL
    Trannoy, Alain
    REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2022, 73 (06): : 977 - 1012
  • [45] Development of a Business Model Resilience Framework for Managers and Strategic Decision-makers
    Radic M.
    Herrmann P.
    Haberland P.
    Riese C.R.
    Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, 2022, 74 (4): : 575 - 601
  • [46] An integrated model for increasing the use of evidence by decision-makers for improved development
    Stewart, Ruth
    Langer, Laurenz
    Erasmus, Yvonne
    DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA, 2019, 36 (05) : 616 - 631
  • [47] A QUICKLY UNDERSTANDABLE NOTATION SYSTEM OF CAUSAL LOOPS FOR STRATEGY DECISION-MAKERS
    MARUYAMA, M
    CYBERNETICA, 1993, 36 (01): : 36 - 41
  • [48] Fragile Algorithms and Fallible Decision-Makers: Lessons from the Justice System
    Ludwig, Jens
    Mullainathan, Sendhil
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2021, 35 (04): : 71 - 96
  • [49] A model for predicting determinants factors for NEETs rates: Support for the decision-makers
    Berigel, Muhammet
    Boztas, Gizem Dilan
    Rocca, Antonella
    Neagu, Gabriela
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC PLANNING SCIENCES, 2023, 87
  • [50] Collaboration and engagement with decision-makers are needed to reduce evidence complacency in wildlife management
    Andrew N. Kadykalo
    C. Scott Findlay
    Matthew Spencer
    Chris L. Callaghan
    Steven J. Cooke
    Nathan Young
    Ambio, 2024, 53 : 730 - 745