Development of a Business Model Resilience Framework for Managers and Strategic Decision-makers

被引:4
|
作者
Radic M. [1 ]
Herrmann P. [1 ]
Haberland P. [1 ]
Riese C.R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer IMW, Leipzig
来源
关键词
Business model; Business model resilience; Covid-19; D22; D24; E32; Framework; H12; L14; L23; L25; M11; M12; M51; Resilience; SME;
D O I
10.1007/s41471-022-00135-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Following the massive impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the global economy and on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in particular, the concept of resilience has experienced a renaissance. As an organizational concept, business model resilience describes the extent to which an organization can maintain or quickly recover its value proposition despite unexpected current or future disruptions (Palzkill-Vorbeck 2018). Although research has been conducted in this area for decades, there is still a lack of a unified framework that brings together the findings from research and links them to organizational practice. The paper addresses this gap by developing a framework for business model resilience and demonstrating its practical relevance for organizational performance during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020. The framework includes 11 factors that characterize the resilience of an organization’s business model. For managers and decision-makers, the framework is an opportunity to assess and improve the resilience of their organizations. For researchers, the framework is an important foundation for transferring the concept of business model resilience into organizational practice. © 2022, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:575 / 601
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Towards integrated security and resilience framework: a tool for decision-makers
    Chmutina, Ksenia
    Bosher, Lee
    Coaffee, Jon
    Rowlands, Rob
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUILDING RESILIENCE, INCORPORATING THE 3RD ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE ANDROID DISASTER RESILIENCE NETWORK, 2014, 18 : 25 - 32
  • [2] The Significance of Emotional Intelligence on the Innovative Work Behavior of Managers as Strategic Decision-Makers
    Dincer, Hasan
    Gencer, Gulsah
    Orhan, Nazife
    Sahinbas, Kevser
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 7TH INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, 2011, 24
  • [3] Towards Strategic Information & Communication Technology (ICT) Framework for Smart Cities Decision-Makers
    El Hendy, Mahmoud
    Miniaoui, Sami
    [J]. 2015 2ND ASIA-PACIFIC WORLD CONGRESS ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (APWC ON CSE 2015), 2015,
  • [4] Which Business Information Do Decision-Makers Need at Work? - Towards a Classification Framework
    Riehle, Dennis M.
    Radas, Jonathan
    [J]. 2019 IEEE 21ST CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS INFORMATICS (CBI), VOL 1, 2019, : 312 - 319
  • [5] Assessing the of potential of e-business models: towards a framework for assisting decision-makers
    Hayes, J
    Finnegan, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2005, 160 (02) : 365 - 379
  • [6] ASYMMETRIC ROLES FOR DECISION-MAKERS IN CONFLICTS WITH BUSINESS APPLICATIONS
    KILGOUR, DM
    DE, M
    HIPEL, KW
    [J]. INFORMATION AND DECISION TECHNOLOGIES, 1990, 16 (04): : 321 - 331
  • [7] Managing strategic paradoxes: the influence of demographic characteristics of decision-makers
    Glinska-Newes, Aldona
    Escher, Iwona
    Jozefowicz, Barbara
    Luka, Alicja
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 33 (05) : 835 - 858
  • [8] A CAREER DEVELOPMENTAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING TEACHERS AS DECISION-MAKERS
    BACHARACH, SB
    CONLEY, SC
    SHEDD, JB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONNEL EVALUATION IN EDUCATION, 1987, 1 (02): : 181 - 194
  • [9] An integrated model for increasing the use of evidence by decision-makers for improved development
    Stewart, Ruth
    Langer, Laurenz
    Erasmus, Yvonne
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA, 2019, 36 (05) : 616 - 631
  • [10] Metals in the European Marine Strategies Legislation: A Challenge for the Managers and Decision-Makers
    Tovar-Sanchez, Antonio
    Buonocore, Cira
    Roque, David
    Blasco, Julian
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 52 (14) : 7601 - 7603