A system dynamics model for supporting decision-makers in irrigation water management

被引:72
|
作者
Pluchinotta, Irene [1 ]
Pagano, Alessandro [2 ]
Giordano, Raffaele [2 ]
Tsoukias, Alexis [1 ]
机构
[1] PSL Res Univ, Univ Paris Dauphine, LAMSADE CNRS, Pl Marechal Lattre de Tassigny, F-75016 Paris, France
[2] CNR, Water Res Inst, Viale Francesco do Blasio 5, I-70132 Bari, Italy
关键词
Water management; Participatory modelling; Decision analysis; System dynamics; Interactions space; Sustainability; GROUNDWATER PROTECTION; CONFLICT-ANALYSIS; RESOURCE; ACCEPTABILITY; SIMULATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.083
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Water management is a controversial environmental policy issue, due to the heterogeneity of interests associated with a shared resource and the increasing level of conflict among water uses and users. Nowadays, there is a cumulative interest in enhancing multi-stakeholder decision-making processes, overtaking binding mercantile business, in water management domain. This requires the development of dynamic decision-aiding tools able to integrate the different problem frames held by the decision makers, to clarify the differences, to support the creation of collaborative decision-making processes and to provide shared platforms of interactions. In literature, these issues are faced by concepts such as Ostrom's action arena and Ostanello-Tsoukias' interaction space (IS). The analysis of the interactions structure and of the different problem framing involved are fundamental premises for a successful debate for the management of a common-pool resource. Specifically, the present paper suggests a dynamic evolution of the IS, highlighting its criticalities. It develops an alternative perspective on the problem, using a System Dynamics Model (SDM), exploring how different actions can influence the decision-making processes of various stakeholders involved in the IS. The SDM has been implemented in a multi-stakeholders decision-making situation in order to support water management and groundwater protection in the agricultural systems in the Capitanata area (Apulia region, Southern Italy).
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 824
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Supporting Decision Makers with Knowledge Management Systems
    Handzic, Meliha
    PACIFIC ASIA CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS 2007, SECTIONS 1-6, 2007,
  • [22] Decision support model for irrigation water management
    Prajamwong, S
    Merkley, GP
    Allen, RG
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 1997, 123 (02) : 106 - 113
  • [23] Decision support model for irrigation water management
    Royal Irrigation Dept, Samsen Rd, Bangkok, Thailand
    J Irrig Drain Eng, 2 (106-113):
  • [24] CRISIS MANAGEMENT - TOOLS FOR DECISION-MAKERS - FRENCH - LAGADEC,P
    BESNIER, JM
    ESPRIT, 1991, (11) : 161 - 162
  • [25] Web-based outreach for orchard management decision-makers
    Jones, Wendy E.
    Chambers, Ute
    Gadino, Angela
    Brunner, Jay F.
    BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2016, 102 : 112 - 120
  • [26] Directional scale elasticity considering the management preference of decision-makers
    Ren, Tiantian
    Zhou, Zhongbao
    Li, Ruiyang
    Liu, Wenbin
    RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2021, 55 (05) : 2861 - 2881
  • [27] Collective risk management: Insights and opportunities for DoD decision-makers
    Linkov I.
    Wood M.D.
    Ditmer R.
    Cox A.
    Ross R.
    Environment Systems and Decisions, 2013, 33 (3) : 335 - 340
  • [28] MANAGEMENT SCIENCE FOR DECISION-MAKERS - AUSTIN,LM, GHANDFOROUSH,P
    LEHANEY, B
    PLATT, A
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1994, 45 (08) : 961 - 961
  • [29] Using high-resolution climate change information in water management: a decision-makers' perspective
    Orr, H. G.
    Ekstrom, M.
    Charlton, M. B.
    Peat, K. L.
    Fowler, H. J.
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2021, 379 (2195):
  • [30] Decision-makers' attitudes towards economic valuation - a case study of German water management authorities
    Dehnhardt, Alexandra
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 2 (02) : 201 - 221