A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis and Machine Learning Methods

被引:445
|
作者
Khosravi, Khabat [1 ]
Shahabi, Himan [2 ]
Binh Thai Pham [3 ]
Adamowski, Jan [4 ]
Shirzadi, Ataollah [5 ]
Pradhan, Biswajeet [6 ,7 ]
Dou, Jie [8 ]
Ly, Hai-Bang [9 ]
Grof, Gyula [10 ]
Huu Loc Ho [11 ]
Hong, Haoyuan [12 ]
Chapi, Kamran [5 ]
Prakash, Indra [13 ]
机构
[1] Sari Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ, Dept Watershed Management Engn, Sari, Iran
[2] Univ Kurdistan, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Geomorphol, Sanandaj, Iran
[3] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Bioresource Engn, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Kurdistan, Dept Rangeland & Watershed Management, Fac Nat Res, Sanandaj, Iran
[6] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & IT, CAMGIS, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[7] Sejong Univ, Dept Energy & Mineral Resources Engn, 209 NeungdongroGwangjin Gu, Seoul 05006, South Korea
[8] PWRI, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[9] Univ Transport Technol, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
[10] Budapest Univ Technol & Econ, Dept Energy Engn, Budapest, Hungary
[11] Nguyen Tat Thanh Univ, NTT Hitech Inst, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[12] Nanjing Normal Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[13] Govt Gujarat, Dept Sci & Technol, BISAG, Gandhinagar, India
关键词
Flood susceptibility; Machine Learning; Multi-Criteria Decision-Making; GIS; China; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE APPROACH; DATA MINING TECHNIQUES; WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE; NAIVE BAYES TREE; FREQUENCY RATIO; RIVER-BASIN; ENSEMBLE; FOREST; COUNTY; VIKOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Floods around the world are having devastating effects on human life and property. In this paper, three Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) analysis techniques (VIKOR, TOPSIS and SAW), along with two machine learning methods (NBT and NB), were tested for their ability to model flood susceptibility in one of China's most flood-prone areas, the Ningdu Catchment. Twelve flood conditioning factors were used as input parameters: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), lithology, land use, distance from river, curvature, altitude, Stream Transport Index (STI), Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Stream Power Index (SPI), soil type, slope and rainfall. The predictive capacity of the models was evaluated and validated using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC). While all models showed a strong flood prediction capability (AUC > 0.95), the NBT model performed best (AUC = 0.98), suggesting that, among the models studied, the NBT model is a promising tool for the assessment of flood-prone areas and can allow for proper planning and management of flood hazards.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 323
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multi-criteria decision making methods: A comparative study
    Ben-Arieh, D
    INTERFACES, 2002, 32 (02) : 81 - 83
  • [42] Multi-Criteria Decision Making for the Assessment of Coastal Flood Vulnerability
    Boulomytis, V. T. G.
    Zuffo, A. C.
    Gireli, T. Z.
    WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES CONGRESS 2015: FLOODS, DROUGHTS, AND ECOSYSTEMS, 2015, : 1248 - 1255
  • [43] Flood vulnerability assessment using an integrated approach of multi-criteria decision-making model and geospatial techniques
    K. S. Vignesh
    I. Anandakumar
    Rajeev Ranjan
    Debashree Borah
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2021, 7 : 767 - 781
  • [44] Flood vulnerability assessment using an integrated approach of multi-criteria decision-making model and geospatial techniques
    Vignesh, K. S.
    Anandakumar, I
    Ranjan, Rajeev
    Borah, Debashree
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 7 (02) : 767 - 781
  • [45] A Hybrid GIS Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method for Flood Susceptibility Mapping at Shangyou, China
    Wang, Yi
    Hong, Haoyuan
    Chen, Wei
    Li, Shaojun
    Pamucar, Dragan
    Gigovic, Ljubomir
    Drobnjak, Sinisa
    Dieu Tien Bui
    Duan, Hexiang
    REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (01)
  • [46] Sensitivity Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Engineering Applications
    Nabavi, Seyed Reza
    Wang, Zhiyuan
    Rangaiah, Gade Pandu
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2023, 62 (17) : 6707 - 6722
  • [47] A multi-criteria decision-making approach for selection of brand ambassadors using machine learning algorithm
    Shanmugam, Siva
    Padmanaban, Isha
    2021 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING, DATA SCIENCE & ENGINEERING (CONFLUENCE 2021), 2021, : 848 - 853
  • [48] A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Resource Selection in Mobile Crowd Computing
    Pramanik, Pijush Kanti Dutta
    Biswas, Sanjib
    Pal, Saurabh
    Marinkovic, Dragan
    Choudhury, Prasenjit
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2021, 13 (09):
  • [49] Comparative analysis of fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods in maintenance prioritisation of infrastructure assets
    Shahrivar, Farham
    Mahmoodian, Mojtaba
    Li, Chun Qing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES, 2022, 18 (02) : 172 - 195
  • [50] Cost Analysis of Water Quality Assessment Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Moosavian, Seyed Farhan
    Borzuei, Daryoosh
    Ahmadi, Abolfazl
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2022, 36 (12) : 4843 - 4862