A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis and Machine Learning Methods

被引:445
|
作者
Khosravi, Khabat [1 ]
Shahabi, Himan [2 ]
Binh Thai Pham [3 ]
Adamowski, Jan [4 ]
Shirzadi, Ataollah [5 ]
Pradhan, Biswajeet [6 ,7 ]
Dou, Jie [8 ]
Ly, Hai-Bang [9 ]
Grof, Gyula [10 ]
Huu Loc Ho [11 ]
Hong, Haoyuan [12 ]
Chapi, Kamran [5 ]
Prakash, Indra [13 ]
机构
[1] Sari Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ, Dept Watershed Management Engn, Sari, Iran
[2] Univ Kurdistan, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Geomorphol, Sanandaj, Iran
[3] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Bioresource Engn, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Kurdistan, Dept Rangeland & Watershed Management, Fac Nat Res, Sanandaj, Iran
[6] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & IT, CAMGIS, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[7] Sejong Univ, Dept Energy & Mineral Resources Engn, 209 NeungdongroGwangjin Gu, Seoul 05006, South Korea
[8] PWRI, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[9] Univ Transport Technol, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
[10] Budapest Univ Technol & Econ, Dept Energy Engn, Budapest, Hungary
[11] Nguyen Tat Thanh Univ, NTT Hitech Inst, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[12] Nanjing Normal Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[13] Govt Gujarat, Dept Sci & Technol, BISAG, Gandhinagar, India
关键词
Flood susceptibility; Machine Learning; Multi-Criteria Decision-Making; GIS; China; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE APPROACH; DATA MINING TECHNIQUES; WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE; NAIVE BAYES TREE; FREQUENCY RATIO; RIVER-BASIN; ENSEMBLE; FOREST; COUNTY; VIKOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Floods around the world are having devastating effects on human life and property. In this paper, three Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) analysis techniques (VIKOR, TOPSIS and SAW), along with two machine learning methods (NBT and NB), were tested for their ability to model flood susceptibility in one of China's most flood-prone areas, the Ningdu Catchment. Twelve flood conditioning factors were used as input parameters: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), lithology, land use, distance from river, curvature, altitude, Stream Transport Index (STI), Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Stream Power Index (SPI), soil type, slope and rainfall. The predictive capacity of the models was evaluated and validated using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC). While all models showed a strong flood prediction capability (AUC > 0.95), the NBT model performed best (AUC = 0.98), suggesting that, among the models studied, the NBT model is a promising tool for the assessment of flood-prone areas and can allow for proper planning and management of flood hazards.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 323
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative analysis of machine learning and multi-criteria decision making techniques for landslide susceptibility mapping of Muzaffarabad district
    Khalil, Umer
    Imtiaz, Iqra
    Aslam, Bilal
    Ullah, Israr
    Tariq, Aqil
    Qin, Shujing
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [22] Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory
    Nachappa, Thimmaiah Gudiyangada
    Piralilou, Sepideh Tavakkoli
    Gholamnia, Khalil
    Ghorbanzadeh, Omid
    Rahmati, Omid
    Blaschke, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 590
  • [23] Flood hazard analysis in Mumbai using geospatial and multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Solanki, Yash Parshottambhai
    Kumar, Vijendra
    Sharma, Kul Vaibhav
    Deshmukh, Arpan
    Tiwari, Deepak Kumar
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2024, 15 (05) : 2484 - 2500
  • [24] Flood potential mapping by integrating the bivariate statistics, multi-criteria decision-making, and machine learning techniques
    Tabarestani, Ehsan Shahiri
    Hadian, Sanaz
    Pham, Quoc Bao
    Ali, Sk Ajim
    Phung, Dung Tri
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2023, 37 (04) : 1415 - 1430
  • [25] Flood potential mapping by integrating the bivariate statistics, multi-criteria decision-making, and machine learning techniques
    Ehsan Shahiri Tabarestani
    Sanaz Hadian
    Quoc Bao Pham
    Sk Ajim Ali
    Dung Tri Phung
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2023, 37 : 1415 - 1430
  • [26] Drone selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Khan, Muhammad Sohaib
    Shah, Syed Irtiza Ali
    Javed, Ali
    Qadri, Nafees Mumtaz
    Hussain, Nadeem
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 INTERNATIONAL BHURBAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES (IBCAST), 2021, : 256 - 270
  • [27] Developing the Expert Decision-Making Algorithm Using the Methods of Multi-Criteria Analysis
    Basheleishvili, Irakli
    CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 20 (02) : 22 - 29
  • [28] Comparative Study of Machine Learning Techniques for Inventory Classification Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Phruksaphanrat, Busaba
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, ICMLT 2024, 2024, : 36 - 40
  • [29] Group Decision-Making Using Improved Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Credit Risk Analysis
    Wu, Wenshuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    FILOMAT, 2016, 30 (15) : 4135 - 4150
  • [30] Multi-criteria decision analysis in adaptation decision-making: a flood case study in Finland
    Markus Porthin
    Tony Rosqvist
    Adriaan Perrels
    Riitta Molarius
    Regional Environmental Change, 2013, 13 : 1171 - 1180