Drone selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods

被引:3
|
作者
Khan, Muhammad Sohaib [1 ]
Shah, Syed Irtiza Ali [1 ]
Javed, Ali [1 ]
Qadri, Nafees Mumtaz [1 ]
Hussain, Nadeem [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Aerosp Engn CAE, Islamabad, Pakistan
关键词
MCDM; AHP; COPRAS; direct and indirect methods; TOPSIS method; MODIFIED TOPSIS; MODELS;
D O I
10.1109/IBCAST51254.2021.9393291
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is the method of making accurate decision among many available criteria. It is a scientific method of making decisions. The decisions made by using MCDM are very accurate. MCDM steps have been divided into decision structuring, criteria specification, alternative performance measurement, alternative scoring, and criteria weight. There are many methods available for MCDM. In this study many direct and indirect methods of MCDM have been studied. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) have been found very powerful methods for MCDM. AHP and TOPSIS methods have been compared in this study after using their application formulas. COPRAS method application has also been discussed in this study. After comparing these methods, it was found that the TOPSIS method was ideal to be applied because of its vast applications. TOPSIS method has been found a better and easy method to apply for decision making. TOPSIS method steps including formulas have been presented. The TOPSIS method has been applied at the drones available in the market at desired cost. The formulas of TOPSIS method have been applied at the selected drones. The non-beneficial and beneficial weights have been assigned to the drones. The normalized matrices have been calculated for each drone. The Euclidean distance for ideal best and ideal worst values has been calculated for each drone and assigned performance score. The drones have been allotted ranks starting from highest to the lowest values. The highest rank drone has been selected.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 270
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Richard Edgar Hodgett
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 85 : 1145 - 1157
  • [2] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Hodgett, Richard Edgar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (5-8): : 1145 - 1157
  • [3] A Comparison of the Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods for the Selection of Researchers
    Kaya, Gulsum Kubra
    Ozturk, Fatih
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IN THE INTERNET-OF-THINGS WORLD, GJCIE 2020, 2022, : 147 - 159
  • [4] Material selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods: a comparative study
    Athawale, Vijay Manikrao
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART L-JOURNAL OF MATERIALS-DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, 226 (L4) : 266 - 285
  • [5] Optimal Selection of Stock Portfolios Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Jing, Dongmei
    Imeni, Mohsen
    Edalatpanah, Seyyed Ahmad
    Alburaikan, Alhanouf
    Khalifa, Hamiden Abd El-Wahed
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [6] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS FOR SUPPLIER SELECTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW
    Yildiz, A.
    Yayla, A. Y.
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 26 (02): : 158 - 177
  • [7] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Case of Software Vendor Selection
    Rani, Anshul
    Mishra, Deepti
    Omerovic, Aida
    [J]. TEM JOURNAL-TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATICS, 2024, 13 (02): : 1218 - 1229
  • [8] Selection of Construction Equipment by Using Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods
    Temiz, I.
    Calis, G.
    [J]. CREATIVE CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE 2017, CCC 2017, 2017, 196 : 286 - 293
  • [9] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187
  • [10] A REVIEW OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS FOR BUILDING ASSESSMENT, SELECTION, AND RETROFIT
    Villalba, Paola
    Sanchez-garrido, Antonio J.
    Yepes, Victor
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 30 (05)