A Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Resource Selection in Mobile Crowd Computing

被引:33
|
作者
Pramanik, Pijush Kanti Dutta [1 ]
Biswas, Sanjib [2 ]
Pal, Saurabh [1 ]
Marinkovic, Dragan [3 ]
Choudhury, Prasenjit [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Durgapur 713209, India
[2] Calcutta Business Sch, Decis Sci Operat & Informat Syst, Kolkata 743503, India
[3] Tech Univ Berlin, Fac Mech & Transport Syst, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
来源
SYMMETRY-BASEL | 2021年 / 13卷 / 09期
关键词
mobile cloud; mobile grid; dynamic resource selection; MCDM; entropy; EDAS; ARAS; MABAC; MARCOS; COPRAS; time complexity analysis; INTEGRATED MCDM APPROACH; MULTIPLE-CRITERIA; SUPPLIER SELECTION; MODEL; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; TRANSPORT; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.3390/sym13091713
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In mobile crowd computing (MCC), smart mobile devices (SMDs) are utilized as computing resources. To achieve satisfactory performance and quality of service, selecting the most suitable resources (SMDs) is crucial. The selection is generally made based on the computing capability of an SMD, which is defined by its various fixed and variable resource parameters. As the selection is made on different criteria of varying significance, the resource selection problem can be duly represented as an MCDM problem. However, for the real-time implementation of MCC and considering its dynamicity, the resource selection algorithm should be time-efficient. In this paper, we aim to find out a suitable MCDM method for resource selection in such a dynamic and time-constraint environment. For this, we present a comparative analysis of various MCDM methods under asymmetric conditions with varying selection criteria and alternative sets. Various datasets of different sizes are used for evaluation. We execute each program on a Windows-based laptop and also on an Android-based smartphone to assess average runtimes. Besides time complexity analysis, we perform sensitivity analysis and ranking order comparison to check the correctness, stability, and reliability of the rankings generated by each method.
引用
收藏
页数:51
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Ceballos B.
    Lamata M.T.
    Pelta D.A.
    [J]. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 5 (4) : 315 - 322
  • [2] Material selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods: a comparative study
    Athawale, Vijay Manikrao
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART L-JOURNAL OF MATERIALS-DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, 226 (L4) : 266 - 285
  • [3] Comparative analysis of three categories of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Li, Yingfang
    He, Xingxing
    Martinez, Luis
    Zhang, Jiafeng
    Wang, Danchen
    Liu, Xueqin Amy
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 238
  • [4] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Hodgett, Richard Edgar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (5-8): : 1145 - 1157
  • [5] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Richard Edgar Hodgett
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 85 : 1145 - 1157
  • [6] A Comparison of the Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods for the Selection of Researchers
    Kaya, Gulsum Kubra
    Ozturk, Fatih
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IN THE INTERNET-OF-THINGS WORLD, GJCIE 2020, 2022, : 147 - 159
  • [7] Drone selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Khan, Muhammad Sohaib
    Shah, Syed Irtiza Ali
    Javed, Ali
    Qadri, Nafees Mumtaz
    Hussain, Nadeem
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 INTERNATIONAL BHURBAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES (IBCAST), 2021, : 256 - 270
  • [8] Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Seismic Structural Retrofitting
    Caterino, N.
    Iervolino, I.
    Manfredi, G.
    Cosenza, E.
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2009, 24 (06) : 432 - 445
  • [9] A mobile application based on multi-criteria decision-making methods for underground mining method selection
    Iphar, Melih
    Alpay, Serafettin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINING RECLAMATION AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 33 (07) : 480 - 504
  • [10] MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS FOR SUPPLIER SELECTION: A LITERATURE REVIEW
    Yildiz, A.
    Yayla, A. Y.
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 26 (02): : 158 - 177