A mobile application based on multi-criteria decision-making methods for underground mining method selection

被引：23
|
作者：
Iphar, Melih [1 ]
Alpay, Serafettin [2 ]
机构：
[1] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Min Engn Dept, Eskisehir, Turkey
[2] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Ind Engn Dept, Eskisehir, Turkey
来源：
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MINING RECLAMATION AND ENVIRONMENT | 2019年 / 33卷 / 07期
关键词：
Underground mining method selection; Multi-criteria decision-making methods; AHP; TOPSIS; PROMETHEE; mobile application; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; SUPPORT-SYSTEM; PROCESS FAHP; PROCESS AHP; MODEL; MINE;
D O I：
10.1080/17480930.2018.1467655
中图分类号：
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号：
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要：
A mobile application has been developed for selecting the most convenient underground mining method for a mine by employing well-known multi-criteria decision-making methods such as TOPSIS, VIKOR, ELECTRE, FMADM and PROMETHEE. The developed mobile application can carry out the selection process by prioritising valid alternative set of underground mining methods for taking into account some decision factors which are not considered in the conventional underground mining method selection approaches. In this way, the engineers are able to use this application for the selection of underground mining method on their mobile devices in anywhere.
引用
收藏
页码：480 / 504
页数：25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparative Study of Various Multi-criteria Decision-Making Models in Underground Mining Method Selection
    Balusa B.C.
    Gorai A.K.
    [J]. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series D, 2019, 100 (01) : 105 - 121
  • [2] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Hodgett, Richard Edgar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (5-8): : 1145 - 1157
  • [3] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Richard Edgar Hodgett
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 85 : 1145 - 1157
  • [4] A Comparison of the Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods for the Selection of Researchers
    Kaya, Gulsum Kubra
    Ozturk, Fatih
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IN THE INTERNET-OF-THINGS WORLD, GJCIE 2020, 2022, : 147 - 159
  • [5] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187
  • [6] Drone selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Khan, Muhammad Sohaib
    Shah, Syed Irtiza Ali
    Javed, Ali
    Qadri, Nafees Mumtaz
    Hussain, Nadeem
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2021 INTERNATIONAL BHURBAN CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES (IBCAST), 2021, : 256 - 270
  • [7] Selection of opencast mining equipment by a multi-criteria decision-making process
    Samanta, B
    Sarkar, B
    Mukherjee, SK
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MINING AND METALLURGY SECTION A-MINING TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 111 : A136 - A142
  • [8] Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods for Sustainable Decision-making in the Mining Industry (A Comprehensive Study)
    Pouresmaieli, Mahdi
    Ataei, Mohammad
    Qarahasanlou, Ali Nouri
    Barabadi, Abbas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 15 (02): : 683 - 706
  • [9] APPLICATION OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING METHODS IN DESTINATION BENCHMARKING
    Lusticky, Martin
    Vachova, Lucie
    Kaderabkova, Jaroslava
    [J]. 15TH INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON REGIONAL SCIENCES, 2012, : 379 - 387
  • [10] Multi-criteria decision-making methods: application in humanitarian operations
    Nain, Aniruddh
    Jain, Deepika
    Trivedi, Ashish
    [J]. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024, 31 (06) : 2090 - 2128
12345