A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis and Machine Learning Methods

被引:404
|
作者
Khosravi, Khabat [1 ]
Shahabi, Himan [2 ]
Binh Thai Pham [3 ]
Adamowski, Jan [4 ]
Shirzadi, Ataollah [5 ]
Pradhan, Biswajeet [6 ,7 ]
Dou, Jie [8 ]
Ly, Hai-Bang [9 ]
Grof, Gyula [10 ]
Huu Loc Ho [11 ]
Hong, Haoyuan [12 ]
Chapi, Kamran [5 ]
Prakash, Indra [13 ]
机构
[1] Sari Agr Sci & Nat Resources Univ, Dept Watershed Management Engn, Sari, Iran
[2] Univ Kurdistan, Fac Nat Resources, Dept Geomorphol, Sanandaj, Iran
[3] Duy Tan Univ, Inst Res & Dev, Da Nang 550000, Vietnam
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Bioresource Engn, Ste Anne De Bellevue, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Kurdistan, Dept Rangeland & Watershed Management, Fac Nat Res, Sanandaj, Iran
[6] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Engn & IT, CAMGIS, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[7] Sejong Univ, Dept Energy & Mineral Resources Engn, 209 NeungdongroGwangjin Gu, Seoul 05006, South Korea
[8] PWRI, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
[9] Univ Transport Technol, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
[10] Budapest Univ Technol & Econ, Dept Energy Engn, Budapest, Hungary
[11] Nguyen Tat Thanh Univ, NTT Hitech Inst, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[12] Nanjing Normal Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Virtual Geog Environm, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[13] Govt Gujarat, Dept Sci & Technol, BISAG, Gandhinagar, India
关键词
Flood susceptibility; Machine Learning; Multi-Criteria Decision-Making; GIS; China; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE APPROACH; DATA MINING TECHNIQUES; WEIGHTS-OF-EVIDENCE; NAIVE BAYES TREE; FREQUENCY RATIO; RIVER-BASIN; ENSEMBLE; FOREST; COUNTY; VIKOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.073
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Floods around the world are having devastating effects on human life and property. In this paper, three Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) analysis techniques (VIKOR, TOPSIS and SAW), along with two machine learning methods (NBT and NB), were tested for their ability to model flood susceptibility in one of China's most flood-prone areas, the Ningdu Catchment. Twelve flood conditioning factors were used as input parameters: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), lithology, land use, distance from river, curvature, altitude, Stream Transport Index (STI), Topographic Wetness Index (TWI), Stream Power Index (SPI), soil type, slope and rainfall. The predictive capacity of the models was evaluated and validated using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC). While all models showed a strong flood prediction capability (AUC > 0.95), the NBT model performed best (AUC = 0.98), suggesting that, among the models studied, the NBT model is a promising tool for the assessment of flood-prone areas and can allow for proper planning and management of flood hazards.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 323
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flood Susceptibility Assessment in Bangladesh Using Machine Learning and Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
    Rahman, Mahfuzur
    Chen Ningsheng
    Islam, Md Monirul
    Dewan, Ashraf
    Iqbal, Javed
    Washakh, Rana Muhammad Ali
    Tian Shufeng
    [J]. EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 3 (03) : 585 - 601
  • [2] Flood Susceptibility Assessment in Bangladesh Using Machine Learning and Multi-criteria Decision Analysis
    Mahfuzur Rahman
    Chen Ningsheng
    Md Monirul Islam
    Ashraf Dewan
    Javed Iqbal
    Rana Muhammad Ali Washakh
    Tian Shufeng
    [J]. Earth Systems and Environment, 2019, 3 : 585 - 601
  • [3] A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Ceballos B.
    Lamata M.T.
    Pelta D.A.
    [J]. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 5 (4) : 315 - 322
  • [4] Coastal Flood risk assessment using ensemble multi-criteria decision-making with machine learning approaches
    Asiri, Mashael M.
    Aldehim, Ghadah
    Alruwais, Nuha
    Allafi, Randa
    Alzahrani, Ibrahim
    Nouri, Amal M.
    Assiri, Mohammed
    Ahmed, Noura Abdelaziz
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 245
  • [5] A novel approach for assessing flood risk with machine learning and multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Shikhteymour, Sharareh Rashidi
    Borji, Moslem
    Bagheri-Gavkosh, Mehdi
    Azimi, Ehsan
    Collins, Timothy W.
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 158
  • [6] A comparative assessment of multi-criteria decision analysis for flood susceptibility modelling
    Shahiri Tabarestani, Ehsan
    Afzalimehr, Hossein
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (20) : 5851 - 5874
  • [7] A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment
    Farahnaz Rashidi
    Shadi Sharifian
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2022, 194
  • [8] A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment
    Rashidi, Farahnaz
    Sharifian, Shadi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2022, 194 (09)
  • [9] Comparative analysis of three categories of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Li, Yingfang
    He, Xingxing
    Martinez, Luis
    Zhang, Jiafeng
    Wang, Danchen
    Liu, Xueqin Amy
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 238
  • [10] Comparative analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods for flood disaster risk in the Yangtze River Delta
    Sun, Ruiling
    Gong, Zaiwu
    Gao, Ge
    Shah, Ashfaq Ahmad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2020, 51