Comparative analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods for flood disaster risk in the Yangtze River Delta

被引:70
|
作者
Sun, Ruiling [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Gong, Zaiwu [2 ,3 ]
Gao, Ge [5 ]
Shah, Ashfaq Ahmad [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Minist Educ, Sch Appl Meteorol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast & Evaluat Meteoro, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Minist Educ, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Res Inst Ecol & Environm Protect, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[5] Natl Climate Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Flood disaster; Risk ranking; MCDM methods; Yangtze river delta; NATURAL HAZARDS; SOCIAL VULNERABILITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CHINA; INDICATORS; PERCEPTION; MITIGATION; STRATEGIES; EXPOSURE; PROVINCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101768
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Nowadays, floods are occurring frequently around the world, and the Yangtze River Delta in China is one of the most vulnerable areas. This study used the Yangtze River Delta as the research object, established the flood disaster risk analysis model, calculated the indicator weights using the entropy weight method, and used three Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods to compare and analyze the flood disaster risk in four administrative units of Yangtze River Delta (Shanghai City, Jiangsu Province, Zhejiang Province, and Anhui Province). Based on the weight estimation results, vegetation coverage was the priority in all evaluation criteria, followed by the proportion of the illiterate population aged 15 and over, drainage density, proportion of crop sown area, and building density. The ranking results show that the flood disaster risk is highest in Jiangsu, followed by Anhui. Shanghai and Zhejiang ranked third and fourth, respectively. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis of the indicator weights was conducted considering that the ranking results mainly depend on the criteria weight. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that the main factors influencing the flood disaster risk level in the Yangtze River Delta are agricultural factors, followed by population density, drainage density, and the number of medical and health institutions. Also, in terms of meteorological and geographical conditions, exposure, vulnerability, and disaster loss, Jiangsu has the highest flood disaster risk, while Anhui has the highest flood disaster risk in terms of emergency and recovery capabilities. The findings can provide useful information on disaster prevention and mitigation managers.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Ceballos B.
    Lamata M.T.
    Pelta D.A.
    [J]. Progress in Artificial Intelligence, 2016, 5 (04) : 315 - 322
  • [2] Comparative analysis of three categories of multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Li, Yingfang
    He, Xingxing
    Martinez, Luis
    Zhang, Jiafeng
    Wang, Danchen
    Liu, Xueqin Amy
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 238
  • [3] Multi-criteria decision analysis for flood risk on the Chenab River
    Hassan, Sher Shah
    Ajmal, Muhammad
    Khan, Aftab Ahmad
    Goheer, Muhammad Arif
    Khattak, Muhammad Shahzad
    Ali, Shaukat
    Ijaz, Muhammad
    Adnan, Muhammad
    [J]. WEATHER, 2019, 74 : S65 - S75
  • [4] Comparative Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Seismic Structural Retrofitting
    Caterino, N.
    Iervolino, I.
    Manfredi, G.
    Cosenza, E.
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2009, 24 (06) : 432 - 445
  • [5] A comparative assessment of flood susceptibility modeling using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis and Machine Learning Methods
    Khosravi, Khabat
    Shahabi, Himan
    Binh Thai Pham
    Adamowski, Jan
    Shirzadi, Ataollah
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Dou, Jie
    Ly, Hai-Bang
    Grof, Gyula
    Huu Loc Ho
    Hong, Haoyuan
    Chapi, Kamran
    Prakash, Indra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 573 : 311 - 323
  • [6] A novel approach for assessing flood risk with machine learning and multi-criteria decision-making methods
    Shikhteymour, Sharareh Rashidi
    Borji, Moslem
    Bagheri-Gavkosh, Mehdi
    Azimi, Ehsan
    Collins, Timothy W.
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2023, 158
  • [7] Group Decision-Making Using Improved Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Credit Risk Analysis
    Wu, Wenshuai
    Kou, Gang
    Peng, Yi
    [J]. FILOMAT, 2016, 30 (15) : 4135 - 4150
  • [8] A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment
    Farahnaz Rashidi
    Shadi Sharifian
    [J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2022, 194
  • [9] A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment
    Rashidi, Farahnaz
    Sharifian, Shadi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2022, 194 (09)
  • [10] Multi-criteria decision analysis in adaptation decision-making: a flood case study in Finland
    Markus Porthin
    Tony Rosqvist
    Adriaan Perrels
    Riitta Molarius
    [J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2013, 13 : 1171 - 1180