Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response

被引:50
|
作者
Albizu, Alejandro [1 ,2 ]
Fang, Ruogu [1 ,3 ]
Indahlastari, Aprinda [1 ,4 ]
O'Shea, Andrew [1 ,4 ]
Stolte, Skylar E. [3 ]
See, Kyle B. [3 ]
Boutzoukas, Emanuel M. [1 ,4 ]
Kraft, Jessica N. [1 ,2 ]
Nissim, Nicole R. [1 ,2 ]
Woods, Adam J. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Ctr Cognit Aging & Memory, McKnight Brain Inst, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Neurosci, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[3] Univ Florida, J Crayton Pruitt Family Dept Biomed Engn, Herbert Wertheim Coll Engn, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Clin & Hlth Psychol, Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Gainesville, FL USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; tDCS; Cognitive aging; Finite element modeling; Machine learning; Treatment response;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2020.10.001
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is widely investigated as a therapeutic tool to enhance cognitive function in older adults with and without neurodegenerative disease. Prior research demonstrates that electric current delivery to the brain can vary significantly across individuals. Quantification of this variability could enable person-specific optimization of tDCS outcomes. This pilot study used machine learning and MRI-derived electric field models to predict working memory improvements as a proof of concept for precision cognitive intervention. Methods: Fourteen healthy older adults received 20 minutes of 2 mA tDCS stimulation (F3/F4) during a two-week cognitive training intervention. Participants performed an N-back working memory task pre-/ post-intervention. MRI-derived current models were passed through a linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) learning algorithm to characterize crucial tDCS current components (intensity and direction) that induced working memory improvements in tDCS responders versus non-responders. Main results: SVM models of tDCS current components had 86% overall accuracy in classifying treatment responders vs. non-responders, with current intensity producing the best overall model differentiating changes in working memory performance. Median current intensity and direction in brain regions near the electrodes were positively related to intervention responses (r = 0.811, p < 0.001 and r = 0.774, p = 0.001). Conclusions: This study provides the first evidence that pattern recognition analyses of MRI-derived tDCS current models can provide individual prognostic classification of tDCS treatment response with 86% accuracy. Individual differences in current intensity and direction play important roles in determining treatment response to tDCS. These findings provide important insights into mechanisms of tDCS response as well as proof of concept for future precision dosing models of tDCS intervention. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1753 / 1764
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Application of Machine Learning to Predict the Engineering Characteristics of Construction Material
    Jinho Bang
    Beomjoo Yang
    Multiscale Science and Engineering, 2023, 5 (1-2) : 1 - 9
  • [23] An Integrative Clustering Approach to tDCS Individual Response Variability in Cognitive Performance: Beyond a Null Effect on Working Memory
    Luque-Casado, Antonio
    Rodriguez-Freiria, Rocio
    Fogelson, Noa
    Iglesias-Soler, Eliseo
    Fernandez-del-Olmo, Miguel
    NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 443 : 120 - 130
  • [24] Using machine learning to predict individual patient toxicities from cancer treatments
    Katherine Marie Cole
    Mark Clemons
    Sharon McGee
    Mashari Alzahrani
    Gail Larocque
    Fiona MacDonald
    Michelle Liu
    Gregory R. Pond
    Lucy Mosquera
    Lisa Vandermeer
    Brian Hutton
    Ardelle Piper
    Ricardo Fernandes
    Khaled El Emam
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022, 30 : 7397 - 7406
  • [25] Do we need machine learning to predict CRT response?
    Stuehlinger, Markus
    Metzler, Bernhard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 342 : 41 - 42
  • [26] USING MACHINE LEARNING TO PREDICT THE NEXT PURCHASE DATE FOR AN INDIVIDUAL RETAIL CUSTOMER
    Droomer, M.
    Bekker, J.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 31 (03): : 69 - 82
  • [27] Machine learning the electric field response of condensed phase systems using perturbed neural network potentials
    Joll, Kit
    Schienbein, Philipp
    Rosso, Kevin M.
    Blumberger, Jochen
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [28] Using machine learning to predict individual patient toxicities from cancer treatments
    Cole, Katherine Marie
    Clemons, Mark
    McGee, Sharon
    Alzahrani, Mashari
    Larocque, Gail
    MacDonald, Fiona
    Liu, Michelle
    Pond, Gregory R.
    Mosquera, Lucy
    Vandermeer, Lisa
    Hutton, Brian
    Piper, Ardelle
    Fernandes, Ricardo
    El Emam, Khaled
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (09) : 7397 - 7406
  • [29] Basic study for electric field calculation by application of machine learning
    Kato K.
    Kato S.
    Matsutomo S.
    IEEJ Transactions on Power and Energy, 2018, 138 (04) : 297 - 302
  • [30] A machine learning approach using EEG data to predict response to SSRI treatment for major depressive disorder
    Khodayari-Rostamabad, Ahmad
    Reilly, James P.
    Hasey, Gary M.
    de Bruin, Hubert
    MacCrimmon, Duncan J.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 124 (10) : 1975 - 1985