Machine learning and individual variability in electric field characteristics predict tDCS treatment response

被引:50
|
作者
Albizu, Alejandro [1 ,2 ]
Fang, Ruogu [1 ,3 ]
Indahlastari, Aprinda [1 ,4 ]
O'Shea, Andrew [1 ,4 ]
Stolte, Skylar E. [3 ]
See, Kyle B. [3 ]
Boutzoukas, Emanuel M. [1 ,4 ]
Kraft, Jessica N. [1 ,2 ]
Nissim, Nicole R. [1 ,2 ]
Woods, Adam J. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Ctr Cognit Aging & Memory, McKnight Brain Inst, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Neurosci, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[3] Univ Florida, J Crayton Pruitt Family Dept Biomed Engn, Herbert Wertheim Coll Engn, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Clin & Hlth Psychol, Coll Publ Hlth & Hlth Profess, Gainesville, FL USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; tDCS; Cognitive aging; Finite element modeling; Machine learning; Treatment response;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2020.10.001
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is widely investigated as a therapeutic tool to enhance cognitive function in older adults with and without neurodegenerative disease. Prior research demonstrates that electric current delivery to the brain can vary significantly across individuals. Quantification of this variability could enable person-specific optimization of tDCS outcomes. This pilot study used machine learning and MRI-derived electric field models to predict working memory improvements as a proof of concept for precision cognitive intervention. Methods: Fourteen healthy older adults received 20 minutes of 2 mA tDCS stimulation (F3/F4) during a two-week cognitive training intervention. Participants performed an N-back working memory task pre-/ post-intervention. MRI-derived current models were passed through a linear Support Vector Machine (SVM) learning algorithm to characterize crucial tDCS current components (intensity and direction) that induced working memory improvements in tDCS responders versus non-responders. Main results: SVM models of tDCS current components had 86% overall accuracy in classifying treatment responders vs. non-responders, with current intensity producing the best overall model differentiating changes in working memory performance. Median current intensity and direction in brain regions near the electrodes were positively related to intervention responses (r = 0.811, p < 0.001 and r = 0.774, p = 0.001). Conclusions: This study provides the first evidence that pattern recognition analyses of MRI-derived tDCS current models can provide individual prognostic classification of tDCS treatment response with 86% accuracy. Individual differences in current intensity and direction play important roles in determining treatment response to tDCS. These findings provide important insights into mechanisms of tDCS response as well as proof of concept for future precision dosing models of tDCS intervention. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1753 / 1764
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Letter: Development of Machine Learning-Based Models to Predict Treatment Response to Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Naik, Anant
    Varshney, Lav R.
    Hassaneen, Wael
    Arnold, Paul M.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 91 (01) : E30 - E30
  • [32] Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment Response in Major Depressive Disorder
    Erguzel, Turker Tekin
    Tarhan, Nevzat
    PROCEEDINGS OF SAI INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (INTELLISYS) 2016, VOL 2, 2018, 16 : 391 - 401
  • [33] Explainable Machine Learning to Predict Treatment Response in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Ahluwalia, Vinayak S.
    Parikh, Ravi B.
    JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2025, 9
  • [34] USING MACHINE LEARNING TO PREDICT THE RESPONSE OF EXUDATIVE CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULAR MEMBRANES TO ANTI-VEGF TREATMENT
    Kumar, Himeesh
    Wickremasinghe, Sanjeewa
    Sarossy, Marc
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 42 : 117 - 117
  • [35] Machine learning to predict anti-VEGF treatment response in a Treat-and-Extend regimen (TER)
    Gallardo, Mathias
    Munk, Marion
    Kurmann, Thomas
    De Zanet, Sandro
    Mosinska, Agata
    van Grinsven, Mark
    Sanchez, Clara I.
    Zinkernagel, Martin Sebastian
    Wolf, Sebastian
    Sznitman, Raphael
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2020, 61 (07)
  • [36] Integrative machine learning model of RNA modifications predict prognosis and treatment response in patients with breast cancer
    Wang, Tao
    Wang, Shu
    Li, Zhuolin
    Xie, Jie
    Jia, Qi
    Hou, Jing
    CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [37] Applying machine learning to predict real-world individual treatment effects: insights from a virtual patient cohort
    Fang, Gang
    Annis, Izabela E.
    Elston-Lafata, Jennifer
    Cykert, Samuel
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2019, 26 (10) : 977 - 988
  • [38] Machine learning to predict radiomics models of classical trigeminal neuralgia response to percutaneous balloon compression treatment
    Wu, Ji
    Qin, Chengjian
    Zhou, Yixuan
    Wei, Xuanlei
    Qin, Deling
    Chen, Keyu
    Cai, Yuankun
    Shen, Lei
    Yang, Jingyi
    Xu, Dongyuan
    Chai, Songshan
    Xiong, Nanxiang
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [39] In Reply: Development of Machine Learning-Based Models to Predict Treatment Response to Spinal Cord Stimulation
    Hadanny, Amir
    Harland, Tessa A.
    Khazen, Olga
    DiMarzio, Marisa
    Telkes, Ilknur
    Pilitsis, Julie G.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 91 (02) : E68 - E70
  • [40] Using machine learning methods to predict electric vehicles penetration in the automotive market
    Shahriar Afandizadeh
    Diyako Sharifi
    Navid Kalantari
    Hamid Mirzahossein
    Scientific Reports, 13