Validity and Reliability of an Adapted German Version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire

被引:57
|
作者
Niemeyer, Thomas [1 ]
Schubert, Christiane [1 ]
Halm, Henry F. [2 ]
Herberts, Tina [3 ]
Leichtle, C. [1 ]
Gesicki, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Spine Serv, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Klinikum Neustadt, Ctr Spinal Surg & Scoliosis, Neustadt, Germany
[3] Univ Tubingen, Dept Med Biometry, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
idiopathic scoliosis; SRS-22; questionnaire; adapted German version; SCOLIOSIS-RESEARCH-SOCIETY-22 PATIENT QUESTIONNAIRE; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; SRS-22; QUESTIONNAIRE; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; ADAPTATION; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819b33be
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Study to determine the internal consistency and validity of adapted German version of Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire. Objective. To evaluate the validity and reliability of adapted German version of SRS-22 questionnaire. Summary of Background Data. The SRS-22 questionnaire was developed to assess the health-related quality of life for English-speaking patients with idiopathic scoliosis. For scientific purpose and standardized comparison of outcome studies for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis its adaptation into German is necessary to respect cultural and lingual differences. Methods. Translation/retranslation of the English version of the SRS-22 was conducted, and all steps for cross-cultural adaptation process were performed. Thus, SRS-22 questionnaire and previously validated Roland-Morris score were mailed to 222 patients who had been treated surgically or conservatively for idiopathic scoliosis. Seventy-eight patients (35%) responded to the first set of questionnaires and 54 of the first time responder returned their second survey. The median age of all patients who joined the study was 19 years. Measures of reliability namely, selectivity, internal consistency, and reproducibility were determined by Cronbach's alpha statistics and intraclass correlation coefficient, respectively. Concurrent validity was measured by comparing with an already validated questionnaire (Roland-Morris score). Measurement was made using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Results. The study demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency with high Cronbach's alpha values for 4 of the corresponding domains (pain, 0.75; self-image, 0.84; mental health, 0.88; and satisfaction, 0.61). However, the Cronbach's alpha value for function/activity domain (0.67) was considerably lower than the original English questionnaire. For the same domains intraclass correlation coefficient demonstrating satisfactory test/retest reproducibility. Conclusion. The adapted German version of the SRS-22 questionnaire can be used to assess the outcome of treatment for German-speaking patients with idiopathic scoliosis.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 821
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reliability and Concurrent Validity of a Culturally Adapted Persian Version of the Brace Questionnaire in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis
    Sedighe Rezaee
    Maryam Jalali
    Taher Babaee
    Mohammad Kamali
    Spine Deformity, 2019, 7 : 553 - 558
  • [42] Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validity of an Adapted Brazilian Portuguese Version of Scoliosis Research Society-30 Questionnaire
    Carrico, Gustavo
    Meves, Robert
    Avanzi, Osmar
    SPINE, 2012, 37 (01) : E60 - E63
  • [43] Measurement properties of translated versions of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire, SRS-22: a systematic review
    Marco Monticone
    Claudia Nava
    Vittorio Leggero
    Barbara Rocca
    Stefano Salvaderi
    Simona Ferrante
    Emilia Ambrosini
    Quality of Life Research, 2015, 24 : 1981 - 1998
  • [44] Measurement properties of translated versions of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire, SRS-22: a systematic review
    Monticone, Marco
    Nava, Claudia
    Leggero, Vittorio
    Rocca, Barbara
    Salvaderi, Stefano
    Ferrante, Simona
    Ambrosini, Emilia
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (08) : 1981 - 1998
  • [45] Validity and reliability of the adapted Dutch version of the Brace Questionnaire (BrQ)
    Peeters, Charles M. M.
    Bonsel, Joshua M.
    Munnik-Hagewoud, Roelina
    Mostert, Adriaan K.
    van Solinge, Guido B.
    Rutges, Joost P. H. J.
    Altena, Mark C.
    Krabbe, Paul F. M.
    Bos, G. J. F. Joyce
    Faber, Chris
    Wapstra, Frits -Hein
    Kempen, Diederik H. R.
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2023, 94 : 460 - 465
  • [46] Reliability and validity of the adapted Turkish version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire
    Aliekber Yapar
    Dilek Yapar
    Yilmaz Ergisi
    Ahmet Yigit Kaptan
    Mehmet Ali Tokgoz
    Alpaslan Senkoylu
    Spine Deformity, 2021, 9 : 57 - 66
  • [47] Reliability and validity of the adapted Turkish version of the Spinal Appearance Questionnaire
    Yapar, Aliekber
    Yapar, Dilek
    Ergisi, Yilmaz
    Kaptan, Ahmet Yigit
    Tokgoz, Mehmet Ali
    Senkoylu, Alpaslan
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2021, 9 (01) : 57 - 66
  • [48] Reliability and Validity Testing of a Danish Translated Version of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument-22 Revised (SRS-22R)
    Simony A.
    Carreon L.Y.
    Andersen M.O.
    Spine Deformity, 2016, 4 (1) : 16 - 21
  • [49] Reliability and Construct Validity of the Adapted Norwegian Version of the Early-Onset Scoliosis 24-item Questionnaire
    Molland, Ragnhild Susanne
    Diep, Lien My
    Brox, Jens Ivar
    Stuge, Britt
    Holm, Inger
    Kibsgard, Thomas Johan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2018, 2 (07):
  • [50] The Association Between Scoliosis Research Society-22 Scores and Scoliosis Severity Changes at a Clinically Relevant Threshold
    Parent, Eric C.
    Wong, Daniel
    Hill, Doug
    Mahood, James
    Moreau, Marc
    Raso, V. James
    Lou, Edmond
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (03) : 315 - 322