The Association Between Scoliosis Research Society-22 Scores and Scoliosis Severity Changes at a Clinically Relevant Threshold

被引:38
|
作者
Parent, Eric C. [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Daniel [2 ]
Hill, Doug [2 ]
Mahood, James [2 ]
Moreau, Marc [3 ]
Raso, V. James [2 ]
Lou, Edmond [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Phys Therapy, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4, Canada
[2] Glenrose Rehabil Hosp, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta Hosp, Dept Pediat Surg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada
关键词
regression analysis; scoliosis; quality of life; surface topography; segmented regression analysis; SRS-22; ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; SCOLIOSIS-RESEARCH-SOCIETY-22 PATIENT QUESTIONNAIRE; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SYMMETRY INDEX POTSI; SPINAL DEFORMITY; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; INSTRUMENT; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cabe75
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Cross-sectional correlation study. Objective. To determine the threshold in spinal deformity severity measurements beyond which there is a progressive decline in health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL). Summary of Background Data. The associations between HRQOL and scoliosis deformity measures are at best moderate when assessed using linear regressions. This may be because HRQOL is not affected until a severity threshold is reached. Identifying the thresholds in deformity beyond which HRQOL deteriorates could assist in treatment recommendations. Methods. The Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire was completed by 101 females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis ( age, 15.0 +/- 1.8; largest Cobb angle, 36.9 degrees +/- 14.6 degrees). Radiographs and surface topography were used to quantify the severity of the internal ( largest Cobb angle) and external deformity ( cosmetic score, decompensation, trunk twist), respectively. Segmented linear regression models were estimated to determine the association between SRS-22 domains and spinal deformity measures. This analysis also identifies deformity thresholds beyond which HRQOL is more affected. The percentage of variance explained (R-2) by linear and segmented models were compared (alpha = 0.05) to identify the best models. Results. Cobb angle predicted significantly more variance in all SRS-22 domains except mental health using segmented models (R-2: 0.09-0.30) than linear models (R-2: 0.02-0.21). Segmented models with a single threshold estimated at a Cobb angle between 43 and 48 predicted between 3% and 11% more variance compared to corresponding linear model using the same variables. Surface topography parameters were not strongly associated with SRS-22 variables with linear and segmented models explaining less than 10% of the variance. Conclusion. Deterioration in SRS-22 scores is mildly associated with increases in the severity of the internal deformity. HRQOL is stable until the curve reaches a maximal Cobb angle threshold at similar to 45 degrees where HRQOL declines linearly with increasing internal deformity. The association between HRQOL and scoliosis severity is low, but is better explained by segmented rather than linear models.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 322
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Polish Adaptation of Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire
    Glowacki, Maciej
    Misterska, Ewa
    Laurentowska, Maria
    Mankowski, Przemyslaw
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (10) : 1060 - 1065
  • [2] Validation of the Korean version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire
    Jung Sub Lee
    Dong Ho Lee
    Kuen Tak Suh
    Jeung Il Kim
    Jong Min Lim
    Tae Sik Goh
    European Spine Journal, 2011, 20 : 1751 - 1756
  • [3] Associations between curve severity and revised Scoliosis Research Society-22 and scoliosis Japanese Questionnaire-27 scores in female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter, cross-sectional study
    Doi, Toru
    Watanabe, Kei
    Doi, Tokuhide
    Inoue, Hirokazu
    Sugawara, Ryo
    Arai, Yasuhisa
    Shirado, Osamu
    Yamazaki, Ken
    Uno, Koki
    Yanagida, Haruhisa
    Kato, So
    Taniguchi, Yuki
    Matsubayashi, Yoshitaka
    Oshima, Yasushi
    Tanaka, Sakae
    Takeshita, Katsushi
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [4] The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis
    Asher, M
    Lai, SM
    Burton, D
    Manna, B
    SPINE, 2003, 28 (01) : 63 - 69
  • [5] Associations between curve severity and revised Scoliosis Research Society-22 and scoliosis Japanese Questionnaire-27 scores in female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter, cross-sectional study
    Toru Doi
    Kei Watanabe
    Tokuhide Doi
    Hirokazu Inoue
    Ryo Sugawara
    Yasuhisa Arai
    Osamu Shirado
    Ken Yamazaki
    Koki Uno
    Haruhisa Yanagida
    So Kato
    Yuki Taniguchi
    Yoshitaka Matsubayashi
    Yasushi Oshima
    Sakae Tanaka
    Katsushi Takeshita
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 22
  • [6] Validation of the Korean version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire
    Lee, Jung Sub
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Suh, Kuen Tak
    Kim, Jeung Il
    Lim, Jong Min
    Goh, Tae Sik
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 20 (10) : 1751 - 1756
  • [7] Psychometric evaluation of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Revised questionnaire among adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis
    Lee, Hyejung
    Choi, Jihea
    Hwang, Jin-Ho
    Park, Jung Hyun
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B, 2017, 26 (01): : 59 - 63
  • [8] Discriminative and Predictive Validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 Questionnaire in Management and Curve-Severity Subgroups of Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis
    Parent, Eric C.
    Hill, Doug
    Mahood, Jim
    Moreau, Marc
    Raso, Jim
    Lou, Edmond
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (22) : 2450 - 2457
  • [9] Analysis of the scoliosis research society-22 questionnaire scores: Is there a difference between a child and parent and does physician review change that?
    Brewer P.
    Berryman F.
    Baker D.
    Pynsent P.
    Gardner A.
    Spine Deformity, 2014, 2 (1) : 34 - 39
  • [10] Influence of cobb angle and ISIS2 surface topography volumetric asymmetry on scoliosis research society-22 outcome scores in scoliosis
    Brewer P.
    Berryman F.
    Baker D.
    Pynsent P.
    Gardner A.
    Spine Deformity, 2013, 1 (6) : 452 - 457