Tumor Characterization with Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biodegradable Macromolecular Contrast Agents in Mice

被引:19
|
作者
Wu, Xueming [1 ]
Feng, Yi [2 ]
Jeong, Eun-Kee [3 ]
Emerson, Lyska [4 ]
Lu, Zheng-Rong [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Pharmaceut & Pharmaceut Chem, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Radiol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Pathol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[5] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
biodegradable macromolecular contrast agent; dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; polydisulfides; tumor characterization; PROSTATE-CANCER; GD-DTPA; VASCULAR-PERMEABILITY; KINETIC-PARAMETERS; MOLECULAR-WEIGHTS; MRI; ANGIOGENESIS; MEDIA; CARCINOMA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s11095-009-9935-x
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
To investigate the efficacy of polydisulfide-based biodegradable macromolecular contrast agents of different degradability and molecular weight for tumor characterization based on angiogenesis using dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI). Biodegradable macromolecular MRI contrast agents, Gd-DTPA cystamine copolymers (GDCC) and Gd-DTPA cystine copolymers (GDCP), with molecular weight of 20 and 70 KDa were evaluated for tumor characterization. Gd(DTPA-BMA) and a prototype of macromolecular contrast agent, albumin-(Gd-DTPA), were used as controls. The DCE-MRI studies were performed in nude mice bearing MDA PCa 2b and PC-3 human prostate tumor xenografts. Tumor angiogenic kinetic parameters including endothelium transfer coefficient (K-trans) and fractional tumor plasma volume (f(PV)) were calculated from the DCE-MRI data using a two-compartment model and compared between the two different tumor models for each contrast agent. There was no significant difference in the f(PV) values between two tumor models estimated with the same agent except for GDCC-70. The K-trans values in both tumor models decreased with the increase of molecular weight of contrast agents. With the same high molecular weight (70 KDa), GDCC-70 showed a higher K-trans values than GDCP-70 due to high degradability of the former in both tumor models (p < 0.05). The K-trans values of MDA PCa 2b tumors were significantly higher than those of PC-3 tumors estimated by Gd(DTPA-BMA), GDCC-20, GDCC-70, GDCP-70, and albumin-(Gd-DTPA) (p < 0.05). The polydisulfide-based biodegradable macromolecular MRI contrast agents are promising in tumor characterization and differentiation with dynamic contrast enhanced MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:2202 / 2208
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intraindividual In Vivo Comparison of Gadolinium Contrast Agents for Pharmacokinetic Analysis Using Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Liang, Jiachao
    Sammet, Steffen
    Yang, Xiangyu
    Jia, Guang
    Takayama, Yukihisa
    Knopp, Michael V.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2010, 45 (05) : 233 - 244
  • [22] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as an imaging biomarker
    Hylton, Nola
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (20) : 3293 - 3298
  • [23] Image fusion for dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Twellmann, Thorsten
    Saalbach, Axel
    Gerstung, Olaf
    Leach, Martin O.
    Nattkemper, Tim W.
    BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2004, 3 (1)
  • [24] Segmentation of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging data
    Nielsen, Thomas
    Mouridsen, Kim
    Maxwell, Ross J.
    Stodkilde-Jorgensen, Hans
    Ostergaard, Leif
    Horsman, Michael R.
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 2008, 47 (07) : 1265 - 1270
  • [25] Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of the breast with magnetic resonance
    Cron, GO
    Santyr, G
    Kelcz, F
    IMTC/97 - IEEE INSTRUMENTATION & MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE: SENSING, PROCESSING, NETWORKING, PROCEEDINGS VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 1354 - 1356
  • [26] Image fusion for dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Thorsten Twellmann
    Axel Saalbach
    Olaf Gerstung
    Martin O Leach
    Tim W Nattkemper
    BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 3
  • [27] Genetic Encoding of Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents for Tumor Imaging
    Schuerle, Simone
    Furubayashi, Maiko
    Soleimany, Ava P.
    Gwisai, Tinotenda
    Huang, Wei
    Voigt, Christopher
    Bhatia, Sangeeta N.
    ACS SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY, 2020, 9 (02): : 392 - 401
  • [28] Imaging tumor vascular heterogeneity and angiogenesis using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Jackson, Alan
    O'Connor, James P. B.
    Parker, Geoff J. M.
    Jayson, Gordon C.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (12) : 3449 - 3459
  • [29] Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy in diabetic mastopathy
    Balan, P
    Turnbull, LW
    BREAST, 2005, 14 (01): : 68 - 70
  • [30] Comparison of Models and Contrast Agents for Improved Signal and Signal Linearity in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Pulmonary Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Bell, Laura C.
    Wang, Kang
    Del Rio, Alejandro Munoz
    Grist, Thomas M.
    Fain, Sean B.
    Nagle, Scott K.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2015, 50 (03) : 174 - 178