Intraindividual In Vivo Comparison of Gadolinium Contrast Agents for Pharmacokinetic Analysis Using Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:17
|
作者
Liang, Jiachao [1 ]
Sammet, Steffen [1 ]
Yang, Xiangyu [1 ]
Jia, Guang [1 ]
Takayama, Yukihisa [1 ]
Knopp, Michael V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Radiol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
contrast agent; DCE-MRI; gadobenate dimeglumine; 7T; crossover comparison; DIMEGLUMINE GD-BOPTA; ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; GADOPENTETATE DIMEGLUMINE; DCE-MRI; KINETIC-PARAMETERS; BRAIN; DTPA; BREAST; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181d54507
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare the intraindividual differences of dynamic signal characteristics for 3 gadolinium chelates (gadopentetate dimeglumine [Gd-DTPA], gadodiamide [Gd-DTPA-BMA], and gadobenate dimeglumine [Gd-BOPTA]) using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (DCE-MRI) with a preclinical beagle model at 7 Tesla. Method and Materials: Seven beagles were scanned 3 times each with a 7-day interval between the scans on a 7T whole body MRI system (Achieva, Philips) using a T/R head coil. Three different Gd contrast agents including Gd-DTPA, Gd-DTPABMA, and Gd-BOPTA were injected in a randomized order with a power injector (Spectris, MedRad, Indianola, PA) using dose of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight and flow rate of 0.06 mL/s. During image acquisition and data analysis, the identity of the specific contrast agent used for each examination was blinded. A 3D RF-spoiled fast field echo sequence was used for dynamic scans with in-plane spatial resolution 0.47 x 0.47 mm2, temporal resolution of 9.5 seconds, and a total of 60 time points. Regions of interest were drawn within the carotid arteries and muscle tissue to determine semiquantitative parameters including maximum enhancement ratio, area under the signal enhancement curve over 90 seconds after contrast injection (AUC_90), time to maximum signal enhancement (T-max), and washout_score. Additionally, quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters were measured in muscle tissues by applying 3 separate 2-compartment models; (1) artery input function (AIF) based Tofts model, (2) Brix model without AIF, and (3) AIF decomposed refined Brix model. Results: Gd-BOPTA produced higher signal to noise ratio on postcontrast T1-weighted images than the other 2 Gd based contrast agents at 7T. Quantitatively, Gd-BOPTA provided a significantly higher maximum enhancement ratio (P < 0.01), AUC_90 (P < 0.01) and washout_score (P < 0.01) in beagle musculature and cranial vasculature compared with both Gd-DTPA and Gd-DTPA-BMA. Among all the quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters, only the exchange rate constants (kep) calculated from these 3 models did not show a significant difference among the various contrast agents. Conclusions: Gd chelate containing MR contrast agents can be used at 7T for DCEMRI. Gd-BOPTA demonstrates stronger signal enhancement than standard Gd chelates, in concordance with the results of studies at lower fields. The observed enhancement characteristics for the 3 contrast agents demonstrate that the pharmacokinetic parameter kep is more robust in various models using DCE-MRI than the other pharmacokinetic parameters. This information is important relative to multisite clinical trials and long-term clinical studies that often use several different contrast agents and different models.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 244
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contrast agents in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Yan, Yuling
    Sun, Xilin
    Shen, Baozhong
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (26) : 43491 - 43505
  • [2] Statistical analysis of pharmacokinetic models in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Schmid, VJ
    Whitcher, BJ
    Yang, GZ
    Taylor, NJ
    Padhani, AR
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2005, PT 2, 2005, 3750 : 886 - 893
  • [3] A comparison of ferumoxytol with gadolinium as contrast agents for the diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging of osteomyelitis
    Langsjoen, Jens
    Neuwelt, Alex
    Eberhardt, Stephen
    Mlady, Gary
    Shukla, Utkarsh
    Murali, Sowmiya
    Pizanis, Charles
    Sillerud, Laurel O.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 71 : 45 - 54
  • [4] Gadolinium-containing contrast agents in magnetic resonance imaging
    不详
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2018, 190 (05): : 469 - +
  • [5] Information for Gadolinium-Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    不详
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2016, 188 (04): : 414 - 414
  • [6] New gadolinium complexes as magnetic resonance imaging - Contrast agents
    Wagner, M
    Ruloff, R
    Hoyer, E
    Grunder, W
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR NATURFORSCHUNG C-A JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES, 1997, 52 (7-8): : 508 - 515
  • [7] Risks of using gadolinium based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents
    Korosi Denes
    Csivincsik Agnes
    Petnehazy Ors
    Vorobcsuk Andras
    Balka Gyula
    Garamvolgyi Rita
    MAGYAR ALLATORVOSOK LAPJA, 2021, 143 (12) : 729 - 740
  • [8] Advances in Contrast Agents for Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Khairnar, Snehal
    More, Namdev
    Mounika, Choppadandi
    Kapusetti, Govinda
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION SCIENCES, 2019, 50 (04) : 575 - 589
  • [9] Microbubbles containing gadolinium as contrast agents for both phase contrast and magnetic resonance imaging
    Tang, Rongbiao
    Yan, Fuhua
    Yang, Guo-Yuan
    Chen, Ke-Min
    JOURNAL OF SYNCHROTRON RADIATION, 2018, 25 : 560 - 564
  • [10] Tumor Characterization with Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biodegradable Macromolecular Contrast Agents in Mice
    Wu, Xueming
    Feng, Yi
    Jeong, Eun-Kee
    Emerson, Lyska
    Lu, Zheng-Rong
    PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 26 (09) : 2202 - 2208