Fuzzy option prioritization for the graph model for conflict resolution

被引:49
|
作者
Bashar, M. Abul [1 ]
Kilgour, D. Marc [1 ,2 ]
Hipel, Keith W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Syst Design Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Dept Math, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada
关键词
Graph model; Preference statement; Fuzzy truth value; Fuzzy score interval; Fuzzy option prioritization; Fuzzy preference; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; PREFERENCE RELATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fss.2014.02.011
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
A fuzzy option prioritization technique is developed to efficiently model uncertain preferences of DMs in strategic conflicts as fuzzy preferences by using the decision makers' (DMs') fuzzy truth values of preference statements at feasible states within the framework of the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. The preference statements of a DM express desirable combinations of options or courses of action, and are listed in order of importance. A fuzzy truth value is a truth degree, expressed as a number between 0 and 1, capturing uncertainty in the truth of a preference statement at a feasible state. A fuzzy preference formula is introduced based on the fuzzy truth values of preference statements, and it is established that the output of this formula is a fuzzy preference relation. It is shown that fuzzy option prioritization can also be used when the truth values of preference statements at feasible states are completely based on Boolean logic, thereby generating a crisp preference over feasible states that is the same as would be found by employing the existing crisp option prioritization, making the crisp option prioritization technique a special case of the fuzzy option prioritization methodology. To demonstrate how this methodology can be employed to represent fuzzy preferences in real-world decision problems, fuzzy option prioritization is applied to an actual dispute over groundwater contamination that took place in Elmira, Ontario, Canada. (c) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 48
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robustness of equilibria in the graph model for conflict resolution
    Yasser T. Matbouli
    D. Marc Kilgour
    Keith W. Hipel
    Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2015, 24 : 450 - 465
  • [22] Behavioral Analysis in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution
    Wang, Junjie
    Hipel, Keith W.
    Fang, Liping
    Xu, Haiyan
    Kilgour, D. Marc
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2019, 49 (05): : 904 - 916
  • [23] Inverse Approach to the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution
    Kinsara, Rami A.
    Kilgour, D. Marc
    Hipel, Keith W.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2015, 45 (05): : 734 - 742
  • [24] Strength of Preference in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution
    Luai Hamouda
    D. Marc Kilgour
    Keith W. Hipel
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2004, 13 : 449 - 462
  • [25] Dominating attitudes in the graph model for conflict resolution
    Walker, Sean Bernath
    Hipel, Keith W.
    Inohara, Takehiro
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2012, 21 (03) : 316 - 336
  • [26] Probabilistic Preferences in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution
    Rego, Leandro C.
    dos Santos, Andrea Maria
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2015, 45 (04): : 595 - 608
  • [27] Perception and emotion in the graph model for conflict resolution
    Obeidi, A
    Hipel, KW
    Kilgour, DM
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOL 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 1126 - 1131
  • [28] Strength of preference in the graph model for conflict resolution
    Hamouda, L
    Kilgour, DM
    Hipel, KW
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2004, 13 (05) : 449 - 462
  • [29] DOMINATING ATTITUDES IN THE GRAPH MODEL FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION
    Sean Bernath WALKER
    Keith W.HIPEL
    Takehiro INOHARA
    Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2012, 21 (03) : 316 - 336
  • [30] ROBUSTNESS OF EQUILIBRIA IN THE GRAPH MODEL FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION
    Yasser T.Matbouli
    D.Marc Kilgour
    Keith W.Hipel
    Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2015, 24 (04) : 450 - 465