Strength of preference in the graph model for conflict resolution

被引:109
|
作者
Hamouda, L [1 ]
Kilgour, DM
Hipel, KW
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Syst Design Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Dept Math, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada
关键词
graph model for conflict resolution; solution concepts; strength of preference; sustainable development conflict; two-decision-maker conflicts;
D O I
10.1023/B:GRUP.0000045751.21207.35
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A new preference structure that includes a simple relative measure of strength of preference is developed and integrated into some of the stability definitions for the graph model for conflict resolution. In this triplet preference structure, a decision-maker may greatly prefer or prefer one state or scenario to another, or may be indifferent between them. Four stability definitions ( solution concepts), Nash stability ( R), general metarationality ( GMR), symmetric metarationality ( SMR), and sequential stability ( SEQ), are extended to include strong and weak stabilities for the case of conflicts with two decision makers. Theorems that clarify the interrelationships of the strong and weak versions of these solution concepts are presented. The application of this new preference structure and the associated solution concepts is demonstrated in an environmental conflict model, called the Sustainable Development Conflict. This case shows that valuable strategic insights are gained when strength of preference is integrated into the stability analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 462
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Strength of Preference in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution
    Luai Hamouda
    D. Marc Kilgour
    Keith W. Hipel
    [J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2004, 13 : 449 - 462
  • [2] Fuzzy Strength of Preference in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Two Decision Makers
    Yu, Jing
    Hipel, Keith W.
    Kilgour, D. Marc
    Fang, Liping
    [J]. 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2017, : 3574 - 3577
  • [3] Preference uncertainty in the graph model for conflict resolution
    Li, KW
    Hipel, KW
    Kilgour, DM
    Fang, LP
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2004, 34 (04): : 507 - 520
  • [4] Preference Strength and Uncertainty in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution for Two Decision-Makers
    Xu, Haiyan
    Hipel, Keith W.
    Kilgour, D. Marc
    [J]. 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), VOLS 1-6, 2008, : 2906 - +
  • [5] Optimizing the cost of preference manipulation in the graph model for conflict resolution
    Rego, Leandro Chaves
    Silva, Hugo Victor
    Rodrigues, Carlos Diego
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2021, 392
  • [6] A Basic Hierarchical Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Weighted Preference
    He, S.
    Kilgour, D. M.
    Hipel, K. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 31 (01) : 15 - 29
  • [7] Inverse Preference Optimization in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution With Uncertain Cost
    Huang, Yuming
    Ge, Bingfeng
    Hou, Zeqiang
    Xie, Hui
    Hipel, Keith W.
    Yang, Kewei
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2024, 54 (09): : 5580 - 5592
  • [8] The graph model for conflict resolution with incomplete fuzzy reciprocal preference relations
    Wu, Nannan
    Xu, Yejun
    Hipel, Keith W.
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 377 : 52 - 70
  • [9] A Comparison of Two Preference Elicitation Approaches in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution
    Ke, Yi
    Li, Kevin W.
    Hipel, Keith W.
    [J]. 2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), VOLS 1-6, 2008, : 3267 - +
  • [10] Option Prioritization for Three-Level Preference in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution
    Hou, Yuhang
    Jiang, Yangzi
    Xu, Haiyan
    [J]. OUTLOOKS AND INSIGHTS ON GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, GDN 2015, 2015, 218 : 269 - 280