Strength of preference in the graph model for conflict resolution

被引:109
|
作者
Hamouda, L [1 ]
Kilgour, DM
Hipel, KW
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Syst Design Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Dept Math, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada
关键词
graph model for conflict resolution; solution concepts; strength of preference; sustainable development conflict; two-decision-maker conflicts;
D O I
10.1023/B:GRUP.0000045751.21207.35
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
A new preference structure that includes a simple relative measure of strength of preference is developed and integrated into some of the stability definitions for the graph model for conflict resolution. In this triplet preference structure, a decision-maker may greatly prefer or prefer one state or scenario to another, or may be indifferent between them. Four stability definitions ( solution concepts), Nash stability ( R), general metarationality ( GMR), symmetric metarationality ( SMR), and sequential stability ( SEQ), are extended to include strong and weak stabilities for the case of conflicts with two decision makers. Theorems that clarify the interrelationships of the strong and weak versions of these solution concepts are presented. The application of this new preference structure and the associated solution concepts is demonstrated in an environmental conflict model, called the Sustainable Development Conflict. This case shows that valuable strategic insights are gained when strength of preference is integrated into the stability analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 462
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robustness of equilibria in the graph model for conflict resolution
    Yasser T. Matbouli
    D. Marc Kilgour
    Keith W. Hipel
    [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2015, 24 : 450 - 465
  • [32] ROBUSTNESS OF EQUILIBRIA IN THE GRAPH MODEL FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION
    Yasser T.Matbouli
    D.Marc Kilgour
    Keith W.Hipel
    [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2015, (04) : 450 - 465
  • [33] DOMINATING ATTITUDES IN THE GRAPH MODEL FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION
    Sean Bernath WALKER
    Keith W.HIPEL
    Takehiro INOHARA
    [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2012, 21 (03) : 316 - 336
  • [34] The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution and Decision Support
    Hipel, Keith W.
    Fang, Liping
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2021, 51 (01): : 131 - 141
  • [35] ROBUSTNESS OF EQUILIBRIA IN THE GRAPH MODEL FOR CONFLICT RESOLUTION
    Matbouli, Yasser T.
    Kilgour, D. Marc
    Hipel, Keith W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2015, 24 (04) : 450 - 465
  • [36] Interactive Unawareness in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution
    Rego, Leandro Chaves
    Alves Vieira, Giannini Italino
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2020, 50 (03): : 829 - 839
  • [37] Coalition Analysis in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution
    Inohara, Takehiro
    Hipel, Keith W.
    [J]. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2008, 11 (04) : 343 - 359
  • [38] Fuzzy Preferences in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution
    Abul Bashar, M.
    Kilgour, D. Marc
    Hipel, Keith W.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2012, 20 (04) : 760 - 770
  • [39] Dominating attitudes in the graph model for conflict resolution
    Sean Bernath Walker
    Keith W. Hipel
    Takehiro Inohara
    [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2012, 21 : 316 - 336
  • [40] Consensus building and the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution
    Inohara, Takehiro
    [J]. IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2010), 2010,