Fuzzy option prioritization for the graph model for conflict resolution

被引:49
|
作者
Bashar, M. Abul [1 ]
Kilgour, D. Marc [1 ,2 ]
Hipel, Keith W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Syst Design Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Dept Math, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada
关键词
Graph model; Preference statement; Fuzzy truth value; Fuzzy score interval; Fuzzy option prioritization; Fuzzy preference; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; PREFERENCE RELATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.fss.2014.02.011
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
A fuzzy option prioritization technique is developed to efficiently model uncertain preferences of DMs in strategic conflicts as fuzzy preferences by using the decision makers' (DMs') fuzzy truth values of preference statements at feasible states within the framework of the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. The preference statements of a DM express desirable combinations of options or courses of action, and are listed in order of importance. A fuzzy truth value is a truth degree, expressed as a number between 0 and 1, capturing uncertainty in the truth of a preference statement at a feasible state. A fuzzy preference formula is introduced based on the fuzzy truth values of preference statements, and it is established that the output of this formula is a fuzzy preference relation. It is shown that fuzzy option prioritization can also be used when the truth values of preference statements at feasible states are completely based on Boolean logic, thereby generating a crisp preference over feasible states that is the same as would be found by employing the existing crisp option prioritization, making the crisp option prioritization technique a special case of the fuzzy option prioritization methodology. To demonstrate how this methodology can be employed to represent fuzzy preferences in real-world decision problems, fuzzy option prioritization is applied to an actual dispute over groundwater contamination that took place in Elmira, Ontario, Canada. (c) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 48
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The fuzzy graph model for conflict resolution considering power asymmetry based on social trust network
    Liu, Peide
    Wang, Xueke
    Wang, Xue
    Wang, Peng
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2025, 689
  • [42] The graph model for conflict resolution with consensus fuzzy preferences and its application to environmental sustainable development
    Wu, Nannan
    Xu, Yejun
    Xu, Lizhong
    Wang, Huimin
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 39 (05) : 6721 - 6731
  • [43] A strategic conflict analysis in IT outsourcing using the graph model for conflict resolution
    Silva, Maisa Mendonca
    Poleto, Thiago
    de Gusmao, Ana Paula Henriques
    Costa, Ana Paula Cabral Seixas
    JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2020, 33 (06) : 1581 - 1598
  • [44] Option Effectiveness in Conflict Resolution
    Alhindi, Taha J.
    Kilgour, D. Marc
    Hipel, Keith W.
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS (SMC), 2018, : 445 - 450
  • [45] The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution and Credible Maximin Stability
    Rego, Leandro Chaves
    Vieira, Giannini Italino Alves
    Kilgour, D. Marc
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2023, 53 (02): : 947 - 956
  • [46] The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: Past, Present, and Future
    D. Marc Kilgour
    Keith W. Hipel
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2005, 14 : 441 - 460
  • [47] Berge Solution Concepts in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution
    Giannini Italino Alves Vieira
    Leandro Chaves Rêgo
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2020, 29 : 103 - 125
  • [48] Status quo analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution
    Li, KW
    Kilgour, DM
    Hipel, KW
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2005, 56 (06) : 699 - 707
  • [49] Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Grey Information and Application
    Liu, Yong
    JOURNAL OF GREY SYSTEM, 2016, 28 (01): : 52 - 64
  • [50] Berge Solution Concepts in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution
    Alves Vieira, Giannini Italino
    Rego, Leandro Chaves
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2020, 29 (01) : 103 - 125