Comparison of two commercially available ELISAs for circulating sclerostin

被引:30
|
作者
Costa, A. G. [1 ,2 ]
Cremers, S. [1 ,3 ]
Dworakowski, E. [1 ]
Lazaretti-Castro, M. [2 ]
Bilezikian, J. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Coll Physicians & Surg, Dept Med, Dept Endocrinol,Metab Bone Dis Unit, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Med, Div Endocrinol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Columbia Univ, Coll Physicians & Surg, Dept Pathol & Cell Biol, Div Clin Pathol, New York, NY 10032 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ELISA; Metabolic bone diseases; Osteoporosis; Sclerostin; Validation; SERUM SCLEROSTIN; BONE TURNOVER; WOMEN; OSTEOPOROSIS; REGULATOR; MARKERS; DENSITY; MEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-014-2635-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study investigates the performance and correlation of sclerostin measurements by two commercially available sclerostin ELISAs from TECOmedical and Biomedica. We found that the correlation between the results of two sclerostin assays is strong. Circulating sclerostin levels may provide insight into the pathophysiology of metabolic bone diseases such as osteoporosis. However, recent studies suggest that commercially available assays give different results. We compare the analytical performance of the two most used commercially available sclerostin ELISAs from TECOmedical and Biomedica. Sclerostin levels were assessed in 20 paired serum, EDTA, and heparin plasma convenience samples from hospitalized patients. In addition, sclerostin was measured in serum samples from 34 patients with metabolic bone diseases and from 10 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Samples from three healthy donors were used to determine stability and intra- and inter- assay precision. The average serum sclerostin concentration of all patients (n = 64) was 0.713 +/- 0.58 ng/mL with the Biomedica assay and 0.734 +/- 0.43 ng/mL with the TECO assay (p < 0.05). The results correlated strongly (r = 0.9; p < 0.0001), with Passing-Bablok regression showing a linear relationship but with a slight systematic and proportional difference between both assays. Sclerostin levels were about 30 % higher in plasma than in serum for both assays, while no significant difference was seen between EDTA and heparin plasma. Intra- and inter- precision were < 10 % for TECO and < 20 % for Biomedica. Samples were stable for up to three freeze-thaw cycles with both assays. The two commercially available ELISAs for measuring circulating levels of sclerostin are comparable. However, given the small but statistically significant systematic and proportional differences between both assays, results and reference ranges will be assay-specific. Results will also be specific to serum or plasma.
引用
收藏
页码:1547 / 1554
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of two commercially available T cell receptor repertoire sequencing assays
    Mason, Jennifer
    Buchkovich, Martin
    Sims, Jennifer
    Hurban, Patrick
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (16)
  • [32] Comparison of two commercially available gamma interferon blood tests for immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis
    Dominguez, Jose
    Ruiz-Manzano, Juan
    De Souza-Galvao, Malu
    Latorre, Irene
    Mila, Celia
    Blanco, Silvia
    Angeles Jimenez, M.
    Prat, Cristina
    Lacoma, Alicia
    Altet, Neus
    Ausina, Vicente
    CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY, 2008, 15 (01) : 168 - 171
  • [33] Comparison of the interfraction repositioning accuracy of two commercially available thermoplastic mask systems
    Cuijpers, J.
    Bronkhorstz, Y.
    van Werkhoven, A.
    Seniorz, P.
    Doornert, P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 84 : S260 - S260
  • [34] A Comparison Of Two Commercially Available Practical Cooling Interventions On Cycling Capacity In The Heat
    Tyler, Christopher J.
    Kiri, Victor
    Cuttell, Saul
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2012, 44 : 479 - 479
  • [35] Comparison of pulmonary vein isolation between two commercially available cryoballoon systems
    Karlo Filipovic
    Arian Sultan
    Jakob Lüker
    Jan-Hendrik van den Bruck
    Jonas Wörmann
    Cornelia Scheurlen
    Jan-Hendrik Schipper
    Sebastian Dittrich
    Daniel Steven
    International Journal of Arrhythmia, 25 (1)
  • [36] A comparison of a Bayesian population method with two methods as implemented in commercially available software
    Bennett, JE
    Wakefield, JC
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND BIOPHARMACEUTICS, 1996, 24 (04): : 403 - 432
  • [37] Use of pooled serum samples to assess herd disease status using commercially available ELISAs
    Juan Heberth Hernandez-Medrano
    Luis Fernando Espinosa-Castillo
    Ana D. Rodriguez
    Carlos G. Gutierrez
    Wendela Wapenaar
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2021, 53
  • [38] Comparison of Two Commercially Available EPID QA Systems Tested On Two Different EPID Systems
    Alexandrian, A.
    McConnell, K.
    Stathakis, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2934 - 2934
  • [39] Comparison of commercially available 125I-based RIA methods for the determination of circulating hydroxyvitamin D
    Hollis, BW
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 46 (10) : 1657 - 1661
  • [40] Sandwich Immunoassay for the Specific Detection of Circulating Bioactive Sclerostin in comparison with other Sclerostin ELISA
    Wallwitz, Jacqueline
    Gadermaier, Elisabeth
    Berg, Gabriela
    Himmler, Gottfried
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2018, 33 : 385 - 385