Comparison of two commercially available ELISAs for circulating sclerostin

被引:30
|
作者
Costa, A. G. [1 ,2 ]
Cremers, S. [1 ,3 ]
Dworakowski, E. [1 ]
Lazaretti-Castro, M. [2 ]
Bilezikian, J. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Coll Physicians & Surg, Dept Med, Dept Endocrinol,Metab Bone Dis Unit, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Med, Div Endocrinol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Columbia Univ, Coll Physicians & Surg, Dept Pathol & Cell Biol, Div Clin Pathol, New York, NY 10032 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ELISA; Metabolic bone diseases; Osteoporosis; Sclerostin; Validation; SERUM SCLEROSTIN; BONE TURNOVER; WOMEN; OSTEOPOROSIS; REGULATOR; MARKERS; DENSITY; MEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-014-2635-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This study investigates the performance and correlation of sclerostin measurements by two commercially available sclerostin ELISAs from TECOmedical and Biomedica. We found that the correlation between the results of two sclerostin assays is strong. Circulating sclerostin levels may provide insight into the pathophysiology of metabolic bone diseases such as osteoporosis. However, recent studies suggest that commercially available assays give different results. We compare the analytical performance of the two most used commercially available sclerostin ELISAs from TECOmedical and Biomedica. Sclerostin levels were assessed in 20 paired serum, EDTA, and heparin plasma convenience samples from hospitalized patients. In addition, sclerostin was measured in serum samples from 34 patients with metabolic bone diseases and from 10 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Samples from three healthy donors were used to determine stability and intra- and inter- assay precision. The average serum sclerostin concentration of all patients (n = 64) was 0.713 +/- 0.58 ng/mL with the Biomedica assay and 0.734 +/- 0.43 ng/mL with the TECO assay (p < 0.05). The results correlated strongly (r = 0.9; p < 0.0001), with Passing-Bablok regression showing a linear relationship but with a slight systematic and proportional difference between both assays. Sclerostin levels were about 30 % higher in plasma than in serum for both assays, while no significant difference was seen between EDTA and heparin plasma. Intra- and inter- precision were < 10 % for TECO and < 20 % for Biomedica. Samples were stable for up to three freeze-thaw cycles with both assays. The two commercially available ELISAs for measuring circulating levels of sclerostin are comparable. However, given the small but statistically significant systematic and proportional differences between both assays, results and reference ranges will be assay-specific. Results will also be specific to serum or plasma.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1547 / 1554
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] In vitro comparison of two commercially available Holmium:YAG laser fibers
    Marguet, CG
    Springhart, WP
    Tan, YH
    L'Esperance, JO
    Sung, JC
    Maloney, ME
    Zhong, P
    Albala, DM
    Preminger, GM
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 444 - 444
  • [22] Clinical comparison of two commercially available lyme screening ELISA assays
    Dudley, T. A.
    Erwin, D.
    Ewell, A.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 53 (06) : A141 - A141
  • [23] A Comparison and Evaluation of Two Commercially Available Metal Artifact Reduction Applications
    Osawa, Mitsuharu
    Fujita, Naotoshi
    Koyama, Shuji
    Kaneda, Naoki
    Miyachi, Shigeru
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2024, 18 (08) : 213 - 218
  • [24] Comparison of Two Commercially Available Software Platforms for Deformable Image Registration
    Tuohy, R.
    Stathakis, S.
    Mavroidis, P.
    Bosse, C.
    Papanikolaou, N.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06) : 218 - 218
  • [25] Comparison of Aqueous Flow Rates With Two Commercially Available Vitrectomy Systems
    Chu, T. G.
    Buboltz, D. C.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [26] Seed production in watermelon: A comparison between two commercially available pollinators
    Stanghellini, MS
    Ambrose, JT
    Schultheis, JR
    HORTSCIENCE, 1998, 33 (01) : 28 - 30
  • [27] COMPARISON OF THROMBOGENICITY OF COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE CATHETERS
    DURST, S
    LESLIE, J
    MOORE, R
    AMPLATZ, K
    RADIOLOGY, 1974, 113 (03) : 599 - 600
  • [28] Use of pooled serum samples to assess herd disease status using commercially available ELISAs
    Heberth Hernandez-Medrano, Juan
    Espinosa-Castillo, Luis Fernando
    Rodriguez, Ana D.
    Gutierrez, Carlos G.
    Wapenaar, Wendela
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2021, 53 (05)
  • [29] Assessment of heparin anticoagulation: Comparison of two commercially available methods - Invited commentary
    Bidstrup, BP
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1999, 67 (04): : 1016 - 1017
  • [30] Comparison of two commercially available systems proposed for oral administration of capsules in rats
    Chevalier, G.
    Papineau, D.
    Cirio, A.
    Lambert, Y.
    Reperant, G.
    Singh, P.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 314 : S259 - S259