In Vivo Biocompatibility Analysis of a Novel Barrier Membrane Based on Bovine Dermis-Derived Collagen for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)

被引:12
|
作者
Lindner, Carolin [1 ]
Alkildani, Said [1 ]
Stojanovic, Sanja [2 ,3 ]
Najman, Stevo [2 ,3 ]
Jung, Ole [4 ]
Barbeck, Mike [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] BerlinAnalytix GmbH, D-12109 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Nis, Fac Med, Dept Cell & Tissue Engn, Nish 18000, Serbia
[3] Univ Nis, Fac Med, Dept Biol & Human Genet, Nish 18000, Serbia
[4] Univ Med Ctr Rostock, Clin & Policlin Dermatol & Venereol, D-18057 Rostock, Germany
关键词
bovine collagen; resorbable barrier membrane; Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR); biodegradation; biomaterial scoring; DIN EN ISO 10993; immune response; macrophages; transmembraneous vascularization; MULTINUCLEATED GIANT-CELLS; IMPLANTATION BED; PORCINE DERMIS; WOUND REPAIR; CROSS-LINK; AUGMENTATION; INTEGRATION; VASCULARIZATION; BIODEGRADATION; PROLIFERATION;
D O I
10.3390/membranes12040378
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Collagen-based barrier membranes are nowadays the prevalent option for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) procedures. Xenogeneic collagen is highly biocompatible as it shares a similar structure to native human collagen, which prevents it from eliciting an exaggerated host immune response. Most commercially available collagen barrier membranes are porcine-derived, while bovine-derived alternatives are still rarely available. The aim of the present study was to investigate the tissue responses and the barrier functionality of a novel GBR membrane composed of bovine collagen type I (BM). Therefore, the subcutaneous implantation model in Wistar rats was performed to compare the novel medical device with two already clinically used native porcine-based barrier membranes, i.e., Jason (R) membrane (JM) and Bio-Gide (R) (BG), at 10-, 30-, 60-, and 90-days post implantationem. Histochemical and immunohistochemical stains were used for histopathological evaluation including a biocompatibility scoring according to the DIN EN ISO 10993-6 norm as well as histomorphometrical analyses of the occurrence of M1 and M2 macrophages and the transmembraneous vascularization. The bovine membrane exhibited a host tissue reaction that was comparable to both control materials, which was verified by the scoring results and the histomorphometrical macrophage measurements. Moreover, the novel membrane exhibited an integration pattern without material fragmentation up to day 60. At day 90, material fragmentation was observable that allowed for "secondary porosity" including transmembrane vascularization. The results of this study suggest that the novel bovine barrier membrane is fully biocompatible and suitable for indications that require GBR as a suitable alternative to porcine-sourced barrier membranes.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analysis of bone formation and membrane resorption in guided bone regeneration using deproteinized bovine bone mineral versus calcium sulfate
    Alessandro Gavazzoni
    Liogi Iwaki Filho
    Luzmarina Hernandes
    [J]. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2018, 29
  • [42] Analysis of bone formation and membrane resorption in guided bone regeneration using deproteinized bovine bone mineral versus calcium sulfate
    Gavazzoni, Alessandro
    Iwaki Filho, Liogi
    Hernandes, Luzmarina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2018, 29 (11)
  • [43] Physical and biological performances of a semi-resorbable barrier membrane based on silk fibroin-glycerol-fish collagen material for guided bone regeneration
    Pripatnanont, Prisana
    Chankum, Chanokpim
    Meesane, Jirut
    Thonglam, Jutakan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS APPLICATIONS, 2021, 36 (05) : 930 - 942
  • [44] Enhancing guided bone regeneration with cross-linked collagen-conjugated xenogeneic bone blocks and membrane fixation: A preclinical in vivo study
    An, Yin-Zhe
    Song, Young Woo
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Strauss, Franz J.
    Lee, Jung-Seok
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [45] Histologic Analysis of a Novel Extracellullar Matrix Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration: An Experimental Study in Rabbits
    Al-Asfour, Adel
    Tengvall, Pentti
    Andersson, Lars
    Dahlin, Christer
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2013, 33 (02) : 177 - U97
  • [46] A novel strontium-loaded silk fibroin nanofibrous membrane for guided bone regeneration: in vitro and in vivo studies
    Lu, Shijun
    Shen, Ming
    Zhang, Feng
    Wang, Peng
    Zuo, Baoqi
    Zhou, Xichao
    You, Xinran
    Wang, Zhendong
    Liu, Hongchen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (04): : 7046 - 7059
  • [47] Enhanced effects of levan hydrogels and bovine grafts on guided bone regeneration: In-vitro and in-vivo analysis
    Akkulah, Celalettin Yigit
    Erginer, Merve
    Cumbul, Alev
    Kirtel, Onur
    Bayram, Ferit
    Toksoy Öner, Ebru
    [J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2025, 292
  • [48] Guided Bone Regeneration With or Without a Collagen Membrane in Rats with Induced Diabetes Mellitus: Histomorphometric and Immunolocalization Analysis of Angiogenesis and Bone Turnover Markers
    Neves Jardini, Maria Aparecida
    Tera, Tabata de Mello
    de Andrade Meyer, Augusto Cesar
    Moretto, Camilla Magnoni
    do Prado, Renata Falchete
    Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2016, 31 (04) : 918 - 927
  • [49] The osteoimmunomodulatory property of a barrier collagen membrane and its manipulation via coating nanometer-sized bioactive glass to improve guided bone regeneration
    Chen, Zetao
    Chen, Lingling
    Liu, Runheng
    Lin, Yixiong
    Chen, Shoucheng
    Lu, Shifeier
    Lin, Zhengmei
    Chen, Zhuofan
    Wu, Chengtie
    Xiao, Yin
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE, 2018, 6 (05) : 1007 - 1019
  • [50] Microscopic analysis of rat subcutaneous implant of membrane barrier derived from demineralized cortical bovine bone.
    Granjeiro, JM
    Oliveira, RC
    Cestari, TM
    Ceolin, DS
    Taga, EM
    Taga, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A292 - A292