In Vivo Biocompatibility Analysis of a Novel Barrier Membrane Based on Bovine Dermis-Derived Collagen for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)

被引:12
|
作者
Lindner, Carolin [1 ]
Alkildani, Said [1 ]
Stojanovic, Sanja [2 ,3 ]
Najman, Stevo [2 ,3 ]
Jung, Ole [4 ]
Barbeck, Mike [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] BerlinAnalytix GmbH, D-12109 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Nis, Fac Med, Dept Cell & Tissue Engn, Nish 18000, Serbia
[3] Univ Nis, Fac Med, Dept Biol & Human Genet, Nish 18000, Serbia
[4] Univ Med Ctr Rostock, Clin & Policlin Dermatol & Venereol, D-18057 Rostock, Germany
关键词
bovine collagen; resorbable barrier membrane; Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR); biodegradation; biomaterial scoring; DIN EN ISO 10993; immune response; macrophages; transmembraneous vascularization; MULTINUCLEATED GIANT-CELLS; IMPLANTATION BED; PORCINE DERMIS; WOUND REPAIR; CROSS-LINK; AUGMENTATION; INTEGRATION; VASCULARIZATION; BIODEGRADATION; PROLIFERATION;
D O I
10.3390/membranes12040378
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Collagen-based barrier membranes are nowadays the prevalent option for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) procedures. Xenogeneic collagen is highly biocompatible as it shares a similar structure to native human collagen, which prevents it from eliciting an exaggerated host immune response. Most commercially available collagen barrier membranes are porcine-derived, while bovine-derived alternatives are still rarely available. The aim of the present study was to investigate the tissue responses and the barrier functionality of a novel GBR membrane composed of bovine collagen type I (BM). Therefore, the subcutaneous implantation model in Wistar rats was performed to compare the novel medical device with two already clinically used native porcine-based barrier membranes, i.e., Jason (R) membrane (JM) and Bio-Gide (R) (BG), at 10-, 30-, 60-, and 90-days post implantationem. Histochemical and immunohistochemical stains were used for histopathological evaluation including a biocompatibility scoring according to the DIN EN ISO 10993-6 norm as well as histomorphometrical analyses of the occurrence of M1 and M2 macrophages and the transmembraneous vascularization. The bovine membrane exhibited a host tissue reaction that was comparable to both control materials, which was verified by the scoring results and the histomorphometrical macrophage measurements. Moreover, the novel membrane exhibited an integration pattern without material fragmentation up to day 60. At day 90, material fragmentation was observable that allowed for "secondary porosity" including transmembrane vascularization. The results of this study suggest that the novel bovine barrier membrane is fully biocompatible and suitable for indications that require GBR as a suitable alternative to porcine-sourced barrier membranes.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] In Vitro Physico-Chemical Characterization and Standardized In Vivo Evaluation of Biocompatibility of a New Synthetic Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration
    Pereira, Livia da Costa
    de Almeida Barros Mourao, Carlos Fernando
    Neves Novellino Alves, Adriana Terezinha
    de Brito Resende, Rodrigo Figueiredo
    Pinheiro Guedes de Uzeda, Marcelo Jose
    Granjeiro, Jose Mauro
    Louro, Rafael Seabra
    Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana
    MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (07)
  • [42] Horizontal and Vertical Defect Management with a Novel Degradable Pure Magnesium Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) Membrane-A Clinical Case
    Frosecchi, Massimo
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (11):
  • [43] Atelo-collagen type I bovine bone substitute and membrane in guided bone regeneration: a series of clinical cases and histopathological assessments
    Lucaciu, Ondine
    Apostu, Dragos
    Mester, Alexandru
    Campian, Radu Septimiu
    Gheban, Dan
    Miron, Richard J.
    HISTOLOGY AND HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2019, 34 (09) : 1061 - 1071
  • [44] Analysis of bone formation and membrane resorption in guided bone regeneration using deproteinized bovine bone mineral versus calcium sulfate
    Alessandro Gavazzoni
    Liogi Iwaki Filho
    Luzmarina Hernandes
    Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2018, 29
  • [45] Analysis of bone formation and membrane resorption in guided bone regeneration using deproteinized bovine bone mineral versus calcium sulfate
    Gavazzoni, Alessandro
    Iwaki Filho, Liogi
    Hernandes, Luzmarina
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2018, 29 (11)
  • [46] Zinc nanoparticles induced eggshell collagen membrane used for guided bone regeneration: A novel approach in rabbit models
    Nelogi, Santosh
    Puranik, Nisha
    Chindak, Shreya
    Chowdhary, Ramesh
    Naik, Veena
    ODONTOLOGY, 2024,
  • [47] Physical and biological performances of a semi-resorbable barrier membrane based on silk fibroin-glycerol-fish collagen material for guided bone regeneration
    Pripatnanont, Prisana
    Chankum, Chanokpim
    Meesane, Jirut
    Thonglam, Jutakan
    JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS APPLICATIONS, 2021, 36 (05) : 930 - 942
  • [48] Enhancing guided bone regeneration with cross-linked collagen-conjugated xenogeneic bone blocks and membrane fixation: A preclinical in vivo study
    An, Yin-Zhe
    Song, Young Woo
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Strauss, Franz J.
    Lee, Jung-Seok
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2024, 35 (10) : 1226 - 1239
  • [49] A novel strontium-loaded silk fibroin nanofibrous membrane for guided bone regeneration: in vitro and in vivo studies
    Lu, Shijun
    Shen, Ming
    Zhang, Feng
    Wang, Peng
    Zuo, Baoqi
    Zhou, Xichao
    You, Xinran
    Wang, Zhendong
    Liu, Hongchen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (04): : 7046 - 7059
  • [50] Histologic Analysis of a Novel Extracellullar Matrix Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration: An Experimental Study in Rabbits
    Al-Asfour, Adel
    Tengvall, Pentti
    Andersson, Lars
    Dahlin, Christer
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2013, 33 (02) : 177 - U97