In Vivo Biocompatibility Analysis of a Novel Barrier Membrane Based on Bovine Dermis-Derived Collagen for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR)

被引:12
|
作者
Lindner, Carolin [1 ]
Alkildani, Said [1 ]
Stojanovic, Sanja [2 ,3 ]
Najman, Stevo [2 ,3 ]
Jung, Ole [4 ]
Barbeck, Mike [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] BerlinAnalytix GmbH, D-12109 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Nis, Fac Med, Dept Cell & Tissue Engn, Nish 18000, Serbia
[3] Univ Nis, Fac Med, Dept Biol & Human Genet, Nish 18000, Serbia
[4] Univ Med Ctr Rostock, Clin & Policlin Dermatol & Venereol, D-18057 Rostock, Germany
关键词
bovine collagen; resorbable barrier membrane; Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR); biodegradation; biomaterial scoring; DIN EN ISO 10993; immune response; macrophages; transmembraneous vascularization; MULTINUCLEATED GIANT-CELLS; IMPLANTATION BED; PORCINE DERMIS; WOUND REPAIR; CROSS-LINK; AUGMENTATION; INTEGRATION; VASCULARIZATION; BIODEGRADATION; PROLIFERATION;
D O I
10.3390/membranes12040378
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Collagen-based barrier membranes are nowadays the prevalent option for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) procedures. Xenogeneic collagen is highly biocompatible as it shares a similar structure to native human collagen, which prevents it from eliciting an exaggerated host immune response. Most commercially available collagen barrier membranes are porcine-derived, while bovine-derived alternatives are still rarely available. The aim of the present study was to investigate the tissue responses and the barrier functionality of a novel GBR membrane composed of bovine collagen type I (BM). Therefore, the subcutaneous implantation model in Wistar rats was performed to compare the novel medical device with two already clinically used native porcine-based barrier membranes, i.e., Jason (R) membrane (JM) and Bio-Gide (R) (BG), at 10-, 30-, 60-, and 90-days post implantationem. Histochemical and immunohistochemical stains were used for histopathological evaluation including a biocompatibility scoring according to the DIN EN ISO 10993-6 norm as well as histomorphometrical analyses of the occurrence of M1 and M2 macrophages and the transmembraneous vascularization. The bovine membrane exhibited a host tissue reaction that was comparable to both control materials, which was verified by the scoring results and the histomorphometrical macrophage measurements. Moreover, the novel membrane exhibited an integration pattern without material fragmentation up to day 60. At day 90, material fragmentation was observable that allowed for "secondary porosity" including transmembrane vascularization. The results of this study suggest that the novel bovine barrier membrane is fully biocompatible and suitable for indications that require GBR as a suitable alternative to porcine-sourced barrier membranes.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Recent Advances in the Development of Magnesium-Based Alloy Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) Membrane
    Chen, Kai
    Zhao, Li
    Huang, Chenyang
    Yin, Xiaofei
    Zhang, Xiaobo
    Li, Ping
    Gu, Xuenan
    Fan, Yubo
    METALS, 2022, 12 (12)
  • [22] A novel functionally graded bilayer membrane with excellent barrier function and in vivo osteogenesis promotion for guided bone regeneration
    Li, Junxuan
    Ding, Jiaxin
    Zhou, Tao
    Li, Bolun
    Wang, Jingjing
    Wang, Hanchi
    Fu, Li
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [23] Comparison of the physical properties and in vivo bioactivities of silkworm-cocoon-derived silk membrane, collagen membrane, and polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for guided bone regeneration
    Yong-Yun Ha
    Young-Wook Park
    HaeYong Kweon
    You-Young Jo
    Seong-Gon Kim
    Macromolecular Research, 2014, 22 : 1018 - 1023
  • [24] Comparison of the physical properties and in vivo bioactivities of silkworm-cocoon-derived silk membrane, collagen membrane, and polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for guided bone regeneration
    Ha, Yong-Yun
    Park, Young-Wook
    Kweon, HaeYong
    Jo, You-Young
    Kim, Seong-Gon
    MACROMOLECULAR RESEARCH, 2014, 22 (09) : 1018 - 1023
  • [25] Development, Characterisation and Biocompatibility Analysis of a Collagen-Gelatin-Hydroxyapatite Scaffold for Guided Bone Regeneration
    Shankar, Preethi
    Arumugam, Parkavi
    Kannan, Saranya
    ODOVTOS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2024, 26 (03) : 161 - 174
  • [26] Guided bone regeneration of non-contained mandibular buccal bone defects using deproteinized bovine bone mineral and a collagen membrane: an experimental in vivo investigation
    Sanz, Mariano
    Ferrantino, Luca
    Vignoletti, Fabio
    de Sanctis, Massimo
    Berglundh, Tord
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (11) : 1466 - 1476
  • [27] In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Immune Response of Jellyfish Collagen Scaffolds and its Suitability for Bone Regeneration
    Flaig, Iris
    Radenkovic, Milena
    Najman, Stevo
    Proehl, Annica
    Jung, Ole
    Barbeck, Mike
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2020, 21 (12) : 1 - 25
  • [28] Chitosan-based dental barrier membrane for periodontal guided tissue regeneration and guided bone regeneration: A review
    Bee, Soo-Ling
    Hamid, Zuratul Ain Abdul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES, 2025, 295
  • [29] Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) Using a Collagen Membrane Barrier Technique Along With Full Thickness Buccal Mucoperiosteal Flap For the Preservation of the Alveolar Ridge Following Tooth Extraction
    Rabha, P. K.
    Debnath, Subhas Chandra
    Chishi, Anovili N.
    Nath, Priyangana
    Dhanushya, A.
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2025,
  • [30] Ossification of a novel cross-linked porcine collagen barrier in guided bone regeneration in dogs
    Zubery, Yuval
    Goldlust, Arie
    Alves, Antoine
    Nir, Eran
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2007, 78 (01) : 112 - 121